Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


On Monday, I posted Michael Smith’s motion on behalf of Eugene Volokh seeking leave to file an amicus brief with the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in the Walker v. Maryland, et al. case. The Gentle Reader will probably not be surprised to find out that the Kimberlins have strongly opposed Prof. Volokh’s motion.

Lt. Kaffee was unavailable for comment.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Meanwhile, it’s T-minus 7 days and counting in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


This has been filed in the Walker v. State of Maryland, et al. appeal—

The amicus brief described in the motion that Prof. Volokh seeks to file appears to be identical to the one he filed in last year’s appeal of the case against the State of Maryland. That appeal was rejected because of a clerical error by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County who failed to obey the judge’s instructions to sever the case against the State from the case against the Kimberlins. The combined case is now on appeal following the trial with the Kimberlins.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Meanwhile, it’s T-minus 9 days and counting in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Yesterday, I wrote about the fact that the Kimberlins have filed a cross-appeal in the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit, a case they won. Most of us would be satisfied to leave well enough alone when we win in court. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, but …

I spent yesterday evening reviewing their cross-appeal brief again. I’m glad I did. I found information they included which will help me make my case when we get to trial in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit.

Everything is going better than I foresaw.

T-minus 14 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


I’ve been closely following Aaron Walker’s appeal in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals of the case he filed against the State of Maryland and Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin. (Some background: The case against the State seeks to have the laws Aaron was charged under found unconstitutional. The case against the Kimberlins is for malicious prosecution using those laws.) The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin believes Aaron’s case is so similar to mine that the results in that case affect my suit. Thus, I want to keep an eye on what he is saying about the Aaron’s appeal.

The Kimberlins have filed a cross-appeal.

Gentle Reader, think about what that means: they are appealing a lawsuit that they won.

The mind boggles.

I have to admit that I did not foreseen something this stupid.