Tag Archives: Tetyana Kimberlin

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

The TKPOTD for six years ago today dealt with the fact that Brett Kimberlin will throw anyone under the bus. Anyone.

* * * * *

In the false Applications for Statement of Charges that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin filed against Aaron Walker and me in 2013, he stated that Tetyana Kimberlin has “a long history of mental illness,” and it appears from the transcript of one of the bench conferences during the the 2014 Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial that he intended to have Tetyana’s daughter testify to her mother’s alleged mental problems.

THE COURT: … but you’ve got to understand something, you are the party in this case, not your daughter. She’s not a party here.

MR. KIMBERLIN: I understand, but I need to put on, I need tho put this information on and I ask you to let me put this information on. She was listed as a witness.

THE COURT: The problem is what did she witness?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well she witnessed the bipolar and present activity of my wife.

THE COURT: A 15-year old is not competent to testify about any bipolar —

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well she can testify —

THE COURT: That’s subject to an expert witness.

Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., Case No. 380966V, Transcript (Md. Cir.Ct Mont. Co. Aug. 12, 2104) at 48.

Of course, he wasn’t able to get away with that sort of claim when he and his wife were codefendants in the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. trial.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Oh, the July 30th charges against you? I don’t believe that made any false statements. You know, in retrospect, I regret using the term mental illness. I’m not a doctor.

MR. WALKER: With regards to who, sir?

MR. KIMBERLIN: I’m not a doctor.

MR. WALKER: With regards to who? Who were you calling mentally ill?

MR. KIMBERLIN: My wife.

Walker v. Kimberlin, et al., Case No. 398855V, Transcript (Md. Cir.Ct. Mont. Co. Oct. 13, 2016) at 78.

[redacted]

* * * * *

I wound up redacting my closing remarks for that post because I was too close to revealing private information that isn’t the public’s business.

The cockroach also had a [redacted] comment.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

Brett Kimberlin originally got tagged here at Hogewash! as Lord Voldemort (He Who Must Not Be Named) because of his futile attempt to use peace orders to punish Aaron Walker from writing about him. After Kimberlin put up a pirate-themed Bloggers Offense Team website, I began referring to him as The Dread Pirate Kimberlin. That evolved into The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin, The Dread Perjurer Kimberlin, and more. After Kimberlin began defaulting on payment of sanctions and court costs, Dread became Deadbeat.

Brett isn’t the only member of the Kimberlin family to be sanctioned for misbehavior in a lawsuit. This TKPOTD first ran five years ago today.

* * * * *

Aaron Walker sought discovery sanctions against Tetyana Kimberlin because of her failure to be deposed during discovery in the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit. Sanctions have been granted.398855v-di_376The Kimberlins sought to recover their expenses defending the suit. Their motion was denied.398855v-di_378Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

* * * * *

Neither of the Kimberlin’s has paid a dime of the sanctions and court cost they owe.

It would be wise for them to rectify that failure.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

Brett Kimberlin has made almost all of his false statements about me in court filings because statements made in that context are privileged and can’t form the basis of a claim for defamation. The TKPOTD for eight years ago today was a fishing of one set of claims he made in the first RICO LOLsuit that include me as a defendant.

* * * * *

In the Second Amended Complaint of his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has accused me of the following:

From paragraph 76: Virtually every time Plaintiff appears in Court, Defendants Walker and Hoge have stalked him, and Plaintiff fears that Defendant Walker will assault him again. Both Defendants Walker and Hoge constantly write blog posts, some with photos of their shots at the shooting range, stating how they are armed and dangerous and will not hesitate to use their weapons against Plaintiff. Plaintiff has witnessed Defendants Walker, Akbar, McCain, Frey and Hoge attack anyone online who questions their conduct, and at least one reporter has received many death threats after writing about the Defendants.

<fisking>In July, 2013, TDPK tried to have Aaron Walker and me ejected from a courtroom where a set of peace order and protective order hearings to which he was a party were about to begin. Judge Mitchell informed him that we were entitled to be at an open court session.

I’ve never threatened violence to anyone on this blog. I don’t intend to.

If someone has received a death threat, TDPK should make sure that it has been reported to an appropriate law enforcement agency.</fisking>

From paragraph 77: Defendants Akbar, Hoge, Walker, Thomas aka KimberlinUnmasked and McCain have continued to defame and publicly attack Plaintiff after the filing of this Complaint with thousands of tweets and blog posts falsely calling Plaintiff a swatter and stating that he caused Defendant Walker’s termination.

<fisking>I have reviewed every reference to SWATing published here at Hogewash!, and I cannot find a single instance where I have called TDPK a SWATter. I have referred to his involvement in Aaron Walker’s losing his job. BTW, that came up as in the state case, and TDPK was not able to show that what Aaron’s claims is false. Collateral estoppel should apply to any RICO Madness claim relating to Aaron’s firing.</fisking>

From paragraph 80: Defendants Walker, Hoge, Frey and Stranahan condemned Judge Vaughey online which resulted in the judge being targeted by having his home phone number and address posted online, causing the head of courthouse security to provide special security for him. Defendants Walker and Hoge called on their followers to contact Montgomery County States Attorney John McCarthy and demand that he arrest and prosecute Plaintiff based on their false narratives. In March 2013, Defendants Hoge, Walker, McCain and Stranahan launched “Everyone Blog About Howard County (Maryland) State’s Attorney Day,” which resulted in threats by phone and email to the State’s Attorney over a period of several weeks.

<fisking>TDPK can show no causal relationship between my criticism of Judge Vaughey’s decision to ignore a Supreme Court precedent and grant an unconstitutional peace order and any alleged actions that might have been taken by third parties. I have never contacted State’s Attorney McCarthy demanding TDPK’s arrest. I have asked why the Montgomery County State’s Attorney’s Office has ignored Brett Kimberlin’s blatant perjury, but I have never received a reply. The Howard County State’s Attorney’s Office has never confirmed to me that they received any threats as a result of Everyone Blog About the Howard County State’s Attorney’s Office Day.</fisking>

From paragraph 138: On June 8, 2012, Defendant Hoge, who lives in Maryland, wrote a letter to a Congressman in Maryland and imputed that Plaintiff was involved with swattings, that he should be investigated by the FBI and sent to prison. Defendant Hoge published that letter along with a blog post.

<fisking>Yes, I wrote a letter to Congressman Van Hollen. It doesn’t say anything about the FBI, and it doesn’t accuse TDPK of SWATting. Even if the letter were defamatory, and it isn’t, the statute of limitations on defamation had run out by the time TDPK filed his lawsuit.</fisking>

From paragraph 139: Since the filing of the original complaint in this case, Defendant Hoge has published hundreds of blog posts and tweets defaming Plaintiff and accusing him of crime after crime. In fact, the majority of his Hogewash.com blog is dedicated to attacking, cyber stalking and harassing Plaintiff, his family and anyone who supports Plaintiff, including reporters, judges and prosecutors.

<fisking>This blog brings up Brett Kimberlin or one of his associates every day and will continue to do so until he has been brought to justice. Hogewash! has never attacked members of his family, legitimate reporters, judges, or prosecutors.</fisking>

From paragraph 143: Defendants McCain, Walker, Frey, Stranahan, Hoge, DB Capitol Strategies, and Akbar raised and continue to raise money on their websites based on their false narrative about the swattings.

<fisking>As mentioned above, Hogewash! has never accused TDPK of SWATting, but the Gentle Reader should feel free to hit the Tip Jar anyway.</fisking>

From paragraph 156: These Defendants, including Malkin, Hoge, Walker, Ace, Thomas, McCain, Akbar and Frey, egg on their commenters and ask them to get involved, post comments and tweets, demand that Plaintiff be investigated and incite their readers to engage in vigilante action directed at Plaintiff in Maryland.

<fisking>I do encourage the Gentle Readers to get involved. However, as I have said before, I am strictly opposed to any vigilante action directed toward Brett Kimberlin or any other member of Team Kimberlin.</fisking>

From paragraph 186: Other forms of retaliation were the battery of Plaintiff by Defendant Walker; the filing of false criminal charges, peace orders and frivolous civil suits against Plaintiff by Defendants Walker and Hoge; attempting to extort a settlement from Plaintiff in exchange for dismissing a malicious federal lawsuit by Defendants Walker, Backer and DBCapitol Strategies; publishing defamatory stories accusing Plaintiff of swatting; repeatedly threatening Plaintiff with imprisonment based on false narratives; and threatening Plaintiff’s family.

<fisking>TDPK’s allegation of battery was shown to be false over two years ago. He should give it a rest. His thing about false charges, peace orders, and civil suits was found to be meritless by Judge McGann during the 1 July hearing. Collateral estoppel strikes again.</fisking>

From paragraph 249: Defendants Walker, Hoge, McCain and Ali have stalked Plaintiff in public places. Defendants Walker, Hoge and DB Capitol Strategies have filed numerous false criminal and civil actions against Plaintiff over a two-year period, all which have been dismissed or denied. Defendants Hoge, Walker and some of the other Defendants publish daily taunts against Plaintiff and mock this suit with daily posts on their blogs, and continually assert that they are going to get Plaintiff imprisoned. They have attacked Plaintiffs employer and those who donate to that non-profit The Defendants have tried to get Plaintiff fired. They have attacked Plaintiffs wife and teenage daughter and even reporters who have written favorably about Plaintiff. They have even attacked prosecutors who have refused their frivolous charges, Defendant Walker has even imputed in a recent blog post that Plaintiffs teenage daughter is fair game for destruction because of “corruption of blood.”

<fisking>This blog has never attacked any member of Brett Kimberlin’s family. It does engage in mocking him.</fisking>FrenchTaunt

* * * * *

That post was from 2014. In 2015, Tetyana Kimberlin filed the false Application for Statement of Charges alleging that I had harassed her older daughter. With that, Tetyana Kimberlin became an active member of Team Kimberlin, and I have written about her participation in her husband’s schemes.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

Here’s the TKPOTD from three years ago today. It reports on one of odder moments during the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. case.

* * * * *

The Gentle Reader may wonder what part of the evidence and testimony offered during the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. trial caused Judge Hecker to find that the Kimberlins had made statements in their Applications for Statement of Charges that they could not have reasonably believed. One particular incident comes to mind.

During my direct examination of Tetyana Kimberlin, she began denying the contents of various documents she had filed against her husband, claiming that they had been written by Aaron Walker who had exerted some form of undue influence on her. Then I asked her about a protective order petition she filed several days before she met me and more than a week before she met Aaron. When she started to claim that parts of it were untrue, the Judge stopped her. He reminded her that the petition had be signed under penalty of perjury, and then he advised her of her right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment.

That was the end of that line of questioning.

UPDATE—A question has been raised in the comments about the propriety of the judge’s warning to Tetyana Kimberlin. I believe that is was proper because she was proceeding pro se, and it was obvious that she was unaware of the potential consequences of her testimony. In fact, his warning resulted in her petition for a protective order being admitted into evidence with the presumption that it was truthful—which contradicted Brett Kimberlin’s testimony. That helped my case.

* * * * *

Upon reflection, I don’t believe that the Kimberlins did any real planning of a joint defense in that case.

Meanwhile, as of 11:35 pm ET Wednesday—

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

One of the reasons that Brett Kimberlin has done so poorly with his pro se lawfare is that he’s screwed up the discovery process in all of cases he’s been involved in. The TKPOTD for four years ago today dealt with one of his failed motions seeking a protective order in one of his attempts to get out of providing evidence to an opposing party.

* * * * *

The Kimberlins have filed a motion for a protective order in the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit. They aren’t seeking protection of documents that are turned over as a part of discovery. They want to be completely excused from having to provide any discovery.

Their basic argument boil down to: We are special snowflakes and should not have to produce evidence of the allegations we make. The court should trust us, and we should be allowed to blindside the plaintiff with surprise evidence if this case ever makes it to trial.

popcorn4bkOf course, that’s legal rubbish, but I’ll leave it to Aaron Walker to demolish their motion when he files an opposition.

Meanwhile, it looks as if Aaron has asked some probing questions in the discovery he served on the Kimberlins. It will be interesting to see what might come out in a motion for summary judgment—if one is needed. If the court enforces the Kimberlins’ default, …

* * * * *

While the Kimberlins didn’t wind up in default, their antics would up result in the court sanctioning Tetyana Kimberlin for failure to be deposed during discovery.

BTW, every single discovery item that Kimberlin asserted was irrelevant related to an allegations in the false criminal charges that Brett or Tetyana Kimberlin had filed against Aaron Walker.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
10

Yesterday and the day before, I wrote about Aaron Walker’s appeal of the Walker v Maryland, et al. lawsuit that is before the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. Two days ago, I summarized the background of the case. Yesterday, I dealt with Aaron’s appeal of the constitutionality of the Maryland laws used by the Kimberlins to bring the false criminal charges underlying the civil suit. Today, I’ll take a look at the case as it relates to the Kimberlins.

I’m not going to go into much detail about Aaron’s appeal. It’s based on errors Aaron says were made by the Circuit Court during the trail; he’s seeking a new trial.

However, I am going to present an overview of the Kimberlins’ cross appeal. Yes, they are appealing their victory. Here are the main points they make in their cross appeal.

First, they argue that the Maryland statutes Aaron was charged under are constitutional. So what? Even if they had standing to argue on behalf to the State, the constitutionality of a law has nothing to do with whether it was used to maliciously prosecute someone.

Second, the Kimberlins argue that they should be immune from suit because of “victim’s litigation privilege.” As Judge Mason told them when they brought up that bogus defense during a hearing in the Circuit Court, if that if such a defense were proper, the tort of malicious prosecution could not exist. Even if it did, litigation privilege applies to the parties in a court action, and the Kimberlins were not parties in either of the State v. Walker cases.

Third, they argue that the Circuit court erred by not granting summary judgment in their favor. So what? They won at trial, so any such error is moot. Further, Judge Mason found that there were material facts in dispute which need to be presented to a jury, so summary judgment would have been improper.

Fourth, the Kimberlins argue that the Circuit Court erred when it sealed certain documents the they filed. Those documents made false and salacious claims about a third party who was not involved in the case. Sealing them was proper. Indeed, if the Court erred with respect to those documents, it was by failing to sanction the Kimberlins for filing them in violation of the Maryland Rules.

Fifth, they argue that the Circuit Court erred “by denying costs to the Kimberlins while granting costs to Walker.” That claim is, quite simply, a lie. The Circuit Court denied costs to both parties. Period. It did sanction Tetyana Kimberlin for failing to be deposed, and she has not yet paid that sanction.

Sixth, they argue that the Circuit Court erred by failing to correct the judgment to reflect the jury’s verdict sheet. The judgement states: “Specifically, Mr. Walker represented Tetyana Kimberlin as a lawyer on a pro bono basis and a legal defense fund was established originally with her consent.” The jury found that: “Kimberlin withheld that his wife was offered a defense fund and pro bono legal help.” So, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin wants the judgment to be amended to point out how he lied by omission on one of the Applications for Statement of Charges. OK, maybe he should get that one.

Seventh, they claim that the Circuit Court erred by prohibiting them “from introducing evidence during the trial to establish motive and present a robust defense.” So what? They won. Any such error, if it happened (and it didn’t), is moot.

I’ve noted that the outcomes of this appeal and Schmalfeldt’s LOLsuit VIII would affect the next steps in my response to Team Kimberlin’s lawfare. Now, that the Cabin Boy’s™ frivolous suit is dead, we have only to wait for to see how the Court of Special Appeals rules before …

Stay tuned.

UPDATE—2018 JAN 05 05:12:00 UTC tag/brett-kimberlin
2018 JAN 05 05:25:00 UTC tag/walker-v-kimberlin-et-aal-appeal

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
6

The appeal of the Walker v. Maryland, et al. lawsuit is before the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. I have not done much reporting on the course of that appeal because I have been working with Aaron Walker as his paralegal. I know too much about the case, and I did not want to divulge too much to the adverse parties with a slip of the keyboard. There will be no more briefing on the case after today, so I’m going to begin reporting what I know.

The appellees in the case are the State of Maryland and Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin. Originally, Aaron sued the State seeking to have the laws that he had been falsely charged under declared unconstitutional. The Kimberlins were added as defendants in devolved into a malicious prosecution claim. When Judge Mason found the laws constitutional and dismissed the case against the State, he ordered the case severed into two separate cases so that the claim against the Kimberlins could continue, but the Clerk of the Circuit Court has refused to obey that order. Thus, what should have been two separate appeals is one.

Today, we’ll take a look at the underlying facts of the case. Tomorrow and the next day, we’ll take a look at the cases against the two sets of appellees.

In July, 2013, Brett and Tetyana Kimberlin were estranged from each other. After Brett (I will refer to the Kimberlins by their first names for simplicity) sought a protective order against his wife and filed a bogus petition for an involuntary psych evaluation of her, Aaron Walker offered her pro bono legal assistance and, working with me, arranged for her to have representation by a Maryland lawyer. In an apparent attempt at revenge for Aaron’s helping Tetyana, Brett filed a false Application for Statement of Charges which resulted in Aaron being charged with harassment under Maryland Criminal Law § 3-803. The basis of the charge was that Aaron had written about Brett on Twitter and his blog. The charge was dropped.

As the Gentle Reader who has followed this blog for a while knows, Brett continued his lawfare against Aaron and others, including me. In March, 2015, he filed a bogus peace order petition against me which was denied by both the District and Circuit Courts. The basis of his petition was that I had allegedly harassed Tetyana’s elder daughter by writing about Brett on this blog. Rather than appeal that petition further, he drafted and Tetyana filed false Applications for Statement of Charges against Aaron and me which resulted in our being charged with online harassment of a minor under Maryland Criminal Law § 3-805(b)(2). Those charges were dropped.

Aaron sued the State of Maryland, claiming that the State was acting as Brett’s catspaw in the suppression of his First Amendment rights and that the laws being used were unconstitutional. The Circuit Court ruled that Aaron did not have standing his suit as it was originally drafted, but allowed him to amend his complaint. The Kimberlins were added as defendants. As noted above, Judge Mason found the laws constitutional and dismissed the case against the State. The case went to trial against the Kimberlins, and the Court found that they had probable cause to file their complaints. Aaron is appealing the finding that §§ 3-803 and 3-805 are constitutional and certain procedural errors during the trial.

Tomorrow, we’ll take a look at Aaron’s constitutional challenge to Maryland’s harassment statutes and how they can have the effect of chilling free speech on the Internet.

UPDATE—2018 JAN 03 05:03:33 UTC tag/walker-v-kimberlin-et-al
2018 JAN 03 05:03:48 UTC tag/graces-law
2018 JAN 03 05:13:39 UTC tag/tetyana-kimberlin

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
26

The Gentle Reader may wonder what part of the evidence and testimony offered during the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. trial caused Judge Hecker to find that the Kimberlins had made statements in their Applications for Statement of Charges that they could not have reasonably believed. One particular incident comes to mind.

During my direct examination of Tetyana Kimberlin, she began denying the contents of various documents she had filed against her husband, claiming that they had been written by Aaron Walker who had exerted some form of undue influence on her. Then I asked her about a protective order petition she filed several days before she met me and more than a week before she met Aaron. When she started to claim that parts of it were untrue, the Judge stopped her. He reminded her that the petition had be signed under penalty of perjury, and then he advised her of her right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment.

That was the end of that line of questioning.

UPDATE—A question has been raised in the comments about the propriety of the judge’s warning to Tetyana Kimberlin. I believe that is was proper because she was proceeding pro se, and it was obvious that she was unaware of the potential consequences of her testimony. In fact, his warning resulted in her petition for a protective order being admitted into evidence with the presumption that it was truthful—which contradicted Brett Kimberlin’s testimony. That helped my case.

What Happened in Court Today

Posted on by
124

Tetyana Kimber was found to be in contempt of court for her failures to appear. She will be allowed to purge her contempt by obeying all further order of the court.

Bill Schmalfeldt was found not to be in contempt for his recording of the court audio because of what the judge views as a hole in the law. He said that he has learned a lesson and will tighten up future orders allowing remote testimony.

The Kimberlins and I have finished our closing statements. Judge Hecker has taken the case under advisement and has said he will issue his ruling at 1:30 pm tomorrow.

UPDATE—Apparently, a copy of the “written testimony” the Cabin Boy™ published made its way to the Clerk’s Office, was docketed, and was forwarded to Judge Hecker. I asked that it be admitted into evidence as a statement against interest by Schmalfeldt.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
193

There are show cause hearings and a trial scheduled for today in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit beginning at 8:45 this morning in the Circuit Court for Carroll County. My ability to foresee how things will go ends at 8:45 am today. After that, the results depend on the findings made by Judge Hecker.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
34

The Scheduling Order for the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit required that the parties provide certain information to the court not later than close of business last Friday. I filed this last Thursday.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
30

I spent Thursday evening going over various online case dockets to make sure that I’ve kept up with all the open items in the various Team Kimberlin related cases and appeals. I believe I’m caught up, and I also believe that some of the other parties aren’t.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
16

Here’s the text of Judge Hecker’s recent order in Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. I believe this ties up all the loose ends other than the show cause hearings for Tetyana Kimberlin and The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt and matters directly related to the trial.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
51

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has filed an improper reply to one of Aaron Walker’s filings in his appeal of Walker v. Maryland, et al. in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. That’s the combined case against the State and the Kimberlins. The suit against the State seeks to have Maryland’s harassment laws declared unconstitutional as applied to the Internet on First Amendment and other grounds. The case against the Kimberlins seek damages for malicious prosecution using those laws.

Here’s the certificate of service filed with TDPK’s improper reply.(Alexis Rohde is the lawyer representing the State.)

The Gentle Reader may notice that a word appears to be missing from Kimberlin’s last sentence. Actually, there appears to be a great deal more missing than just one word. The most glaring omission is the signature for Tetyana Kimberlin’s attorney who should be filing the reply on her behalf.

Meanwhile, we’re at T-minus 14 days and counting in Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al.

A Non-Hearing

Posted on by
20

Tetyana Kimberlin failed to appear for her show cause hearing for failure to appear. However, she has also successfully dodged service of the court’s sua sponte show cause order, and the Maryland Rules do not permit the hearing to held until she is served. Therefore, Judge Hecker (who is pretty much running the case by the book) continued the hearing until after she is served. Because the writ of summons is still outstanding, no new paperwork was issued.

While this is not my preferred result, it is one of the two possible outcomes I expected.

The next hearings are scheduled immediately before the trial begins on 21 August.

T-minus 18 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
41

This came in yesterday’s mail—

My lawyer will handle it.

Note that I have not redacted the address shown for the Cabin Boy™ because it is no longer valid since he has skulked away from that location.

Nothing is proceeding as the Cabin Boy™ has hallucinated.

Tetyana Kimberlin’s show cause hearing for failure to appear at the pre-trial conference in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit is scheduled for 1:30 this afternoon.

Oh, and the count in Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. has now shifted to T-minus 18 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
35

Now that the Cabin Boy’s show cause hearing has been continued until the date of the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. trial, the next event is Tetyana Kimberlin’s show cause hearing on 14 July. She has been ordered to show cause why she should not be sanctioned for failure to appear at the pre-trial conference for the case.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

T-minus 15 days and counting.

UPDATE—There’s been some speculation in the comments below about the contents of the “notice” which The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin sent to the court concerning the show cause order for Mrs. Kimberlin. I was served with a copy, and the judge briefly discussed it’s contents during the hearing yesterday. For now, I don’t see any advantage in publicly commenting on the contents of that “notice” until after the hearing on 14 July.