Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


During the run up to the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al, nuisance LOLsuit trial, Brett Kimberlin seem particularly bothered by the reporting that Aaron Walker and I were doing on that case and the larger Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness LOLsuit in federal court. He sent a letter the judge in the federal case seeking permission to file a motion for a preliminary restraining order as a gag order against us. That simply resulted in more reporting on The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberli’s shenanigans here at Hogewash! and at other blogs. Here’s the TKPOTD from six years ago today.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin haz sad. He says that Aaron Walker and I called him bad names. This is from his letter seeking to file a preliminary injunction in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.ECF 163 at 1

Terrorist? Here’s what the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals said.

Kimberlin was convicted as the so-called “Speedway Bomber,” who terrorized the city of Speedway, Indiana, by detonating a series of explosives in early September 1978. In the worst incident, Kimberlin placed one of his bombs in a gym bag, and left it in a parking lot outside Speedway High School. Carl Delong was leaving the high school football game with his wife when he attempted to pick up the bag and it exploded. The blast tore off his lower right leg and two fingers, and embedded bomb fragments in his wife’s leg.

Kimberlin v. White, 7 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 1993)

Forger? Here are his own word from the document docketed as ECF No. 102 in the RICO Madness.ECF 102-3That’s an admission that he forged the summons he sent to Twitchy. Also, he made this admission to Judge Ryon in a Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. hearing on 9 April, 2014, concerning a Certified Mail green card for a piece of mail sent to Ali Akbar.BK v AW 2013 0409 at 22

Perjurer? It’s a matter of public record that TDPK is a convicted perjurer, and he has admitted as much in open court multiple times since May, 2014. Furthermore, he’s been caught lying recently. For example, consider these responses to my requests for admissions in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit.BK v AW 2013 Admission 21Pedophile? I haven’t called Brett Kimberlin a pedophile. However, I have seen evidence that leads me to understand why someone might hold that opinion. I suppose that if he wants to push the issue, those who might have used that word will put that evidence before the court. Some of it has been sealed, but not all of it has. Also, court records can be unsealed.

RaisinetesIf popcorn or Jujubes aren’t your favorites, Hogewash! is also offering a deal on Raisinets through Amazon.

Stock up today, and stay tuned.

* * * * *

As it says on this site’s masthead: Never pick a fight with a man who buys pixels by the terabyte.

#BillSchmalfeldt and Pedophilia


I don’t think Bill Schmalfeldt is a pedophile. I think that he is a vile and disgusting thug who delights in crudely splicing other people’s faces into homoerotic porn and who has a sick fascination with scatological “humor,” but the Cabin Boy has his limits. He isn’t a pedophile, and I believe him when he says he finds pedophilia repugnant.

However, I do believe that Brett Kimberlin most likely is a pedophile. As another blogger has noted, there’s too much smoke for there to be no fire. Given the relationship with the Barton girl described in Citizen K and what Tetyana Kimberlin has been able to document to date, yes, I believe that Brett Kimberlin is probably a pedophile. My confidence level for that belief is approaching my confidence in Newton’s Laws of Motion.

Similarly, there’s very little doubt in my mind of the connection between Bill Schmalfeldt and Brett Kimberlin. Schmalfeldt is Brett Kimberlin’s pal, and that association has resulted in some folks referring to the Cabin Boy as an enabler of a pedophile or as a PedoPal. If the shoe fits, …

If Bill Schmalfeldt were capable of honestly reviewing the evidence, I believe that he would come to the same conclusion about Brett Kimberlin that I and many others have, and I believe that, given such an understanding, the Cabin Boy would jump ship.

So why does Schmalfledt stay on board?

Sexual Rights … and Wrongs


Stacy McCain has a thought provoking piece up entitled The Problem With Sexual “Rights”. He discusses how behaviors that were not too long ago universally viewed as perversions are now seen as protected “rights.” It’s provoked me to have several thoughts on the subject, and I’ll share one of them after you’ve read his essay. Go read it. Now. I’ll wait …

To begin, let me say that I have religious-based objections to the sorts of behaviors that Mr. McCain writes about, but, putting those objections aside, I have thoroughly secular objections as well. I’ll stick to one of them for this post.

There are four basic functions of biological organisms. These are replication (they have offspring), heritability (they pass on genetic material to their offspring), catalysis (they have a common set of chemical processes), and energy use or metabolism (they all burn carbon through similar processes).

It seems to me that, of all the perverse behaviors which sexual oddballs claim to be allowed by their “rights,” not one leads to replication of the species. Members of a species that don’t engage in reproductive activity remove themselves from the gene pool. If a sufficient percentage of the members of a species refuse to reproduce, the species will die out. To argue that one was “born that way” is to argue that one is genetically defective. If that’s the case, such a person should be treated with the same dignity and respect that we have for others who have a genetic disorder. OTOH, if the person is simply engaging in non-benefical behaviors for reasons of self-gratification, I don’t understand why such behavior should be socially acceptable. Perhaps a few of these behaviors shouldn’t be illegal, but not every thing that is legal is honorable.

The case of the convict in Massachusetts who wants a “sex-change” operation brings up the point that all the cosmetic surgery in the world will not eliminate the Y-chromosome in his genome. He won’t have ovaries. He won’t be a woman. Ever. He’ll be living a falsehood, a lie.

Popeye got it right. “I yam what I yam, and tha’s all what I yam.”

One of these days, the real world will tire of the liberal push for wrongheaded rights, and folks may start remembering some other words of Popeye’s. “That’s all I can stands, cuz I can’t stands n’more!”

UPDATE—It’s symbolic of his struggle against reality.