Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Yesterday’s TKPOTD dealt with one the more amusing incidents during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance LOLsuit. I noted in that post that the trial judge bent over backwards to treat Kimberlin fairly. However, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin finally pushed too far when he put his wife’s elder daughter on the stand. The TKPOTD from five years ago reports what happened. I was not amused.

* * * * *

Brett Kimberlin is not a good listener. This exchange is from one of the bench conferences during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. Judge Johnson was trying to explain to The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin about hearsay testimony from the Kimberlin daughter about things she did not witness.

THE COURT: — assume all of that is true, what does this 15-year old have to do with that?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because she was harmed. She’s been harmed. She’s been run out of two schools and —

THE COURT: She’s not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: And they have defamed her. They have —

THE COURT: She’s not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: I know, but they have gone on her, she’s a very accomplished musician. They have gone on her websites. They have attacked reporters —

THE COURT: I don’t disagree with any of that, but she is not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: It’s not that she’s a party. They are using the pedophilia against me, against her and they’re doing it to harm me.

THE COURT: Sir, but you’ve got to understand something. We have rules here. You can’t just bring people in to just testify when they A, they didn’t witness anything that they’re competent to testify about and B, she is not a party to this lawsuit.

Judge Johnson seemed to care more for Miss Kimberlin that TDPK did.

THE COURT: But see what I’m trying to avoid is having this little girl come up here, objection sustained, objection sustained, objection sustained. And then having, putting her through that and having nothing really come of it. She can testify to —

TDPK put her on the stand any way, resulting in the following objections to questions or testimony that were not allowed by the rules of evidence.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: To him leading the witness, sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE WITNESS: And I know —
THE COURT: Objection is sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Overruled.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained. Counsel, sir, stop leading the witness.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Come up here.
[Bench Conference]
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Has your mom ever done anything hurtful to you? Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: By these defendants?
MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: I will sustain the objection in that this young lady is not a party to this case. She did not sue these men. Or you didn’t sue them in her name which would have to be the case. If a minor child is bringing the case it would have to be brought by her Next Best Friend who is generally the parent. She is not a party in this case.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — to have sleepovers —
MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — or come to the house or be around you —
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — because of —
THE COURT: Absolutely hearsay.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: She can answer, overruled.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Hold on, anything else? No, you don’t just get to keep going. You have to ask another question.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained. Sir, you’re going way off base.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: You need to do whatever you need to do with admissible evidence pursuant to the rules of evidence and to the law. And I’ve allowed you some, I’ve given you a long leash.
MR. KIMBERLIN: You have and I appreciate it.
THE COURT: And let you run pretty far out there. But I’m now pulling you back in.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: Is it affecting —
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: No further questions.

I cannot find the words to adequately express my disgust with someone who would needlessly inflict that on a child.

* * * * *

It’s been over five years since that trial, and my disgust and anger over what Brett Kimberlin did to that young girl has not abated one bit.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Only one of the failed LOLsuits that Brett Kimberlin filed against me made it to trial. While it was a pain in the neck (or a couple of feet lower) to have to take the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance suit to court, there were some lighter moments in the process. The TKPOTD for five years ago today dealt with one amusing moment during that trial.

* * * * *

judge_johnsonDuring the preliminary matters of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial, there was an extended discussion of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s criminal past that might have bearing on the case. Near the end of the first day’s session, Judge Johnson brought up the topic of jury instructions.

THE COURT: Now, there are no non-pattern jury instructions, are there?

MR. OSTRONIC: Not from the defense side, Your Honor.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Not that I know of.

THE COURT: They’re normal Maryland civil pattern jury instructions.

MR. KIMBERLIN: And we listed those I believe in our pre-trial.

THE COURT: You did list them in your pre-trial statements. Is there any other ticking time bomb — well, that’s a wrong metaphor. Are there any issues laying out there that are going to come up that you can envision?

MR. KIMBERLIN: I don’t think so.

THE COURT: Sometimes we have to be very careful in our selection of metaphors. I always call counsel to task when they tell me about black sheep in the family. I like black sheep. All right.

I hate to disagree with a judge who ruled in my favor, but I thought his metaphor was quite appropriate.

* * * * *

I was sitting next to my codefendant Stacy McCain just behind the defense table. (There were too many defendants for all of us to sit there.) We both had trouble keeping ourselves from laughing. It was at that moment that I figured out that Judge Johnson, who had previous experience with The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin, understood who he was dealing with. Reading the transcripts of the bench conferences that occurred during the trial (I wasn’t able to hear them as they happened), it’s clear that the judge bent over backwards to treat Kimberlin fairly, but Kimberlin’s pigheadedness about how he wanted to present his case led to his loss and our win.

The trial was more of a fizzle than an earth-shattering kaboom.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Six years ago today, I ran this post, In Re Kimberlin v. Walker, et al.

* * * * *

Convicted perjurer, drug smuggler, and bomber Brett Kimberlin has filed a Maryland lawsuit naming bloggers Aaron Walker, W. J. J. Hoge, and Robert Stacy McCain; National Bloggers Club President Ali A. Akbar; and the anonymous blogger Kimberlin Unmasked as defendants.

The defendants believe that the suit is without merit and is part of Kimberlin’s continued effort to use lawfare to silence journalists and bloggers who have written truthfully about Kimberlin’s criminal past and recent conduct. The defendants will not make any further comments until they have finished initial consultations their respective legal counsel.

UPDATE—Stacy McCain’s statement is here.

UPDATE 2—Kimberlin Unmasked’s statement is here. [Broken link]

* * * * *

The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin made countless errors during his ill-fated attempts at pro se litigation. His worst mistake was suing me.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Five years ago, The Saga of Team Kimberlin had taken a decisive turn away from The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s version of the narrative after his loss in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial. That was the first of many LOLsuit he would lose over the next couple of years. The TKPOTD from five years ago today dealt with TDPK’s futile attempt to get a preliminary injunction against several of my codefendants and me in the RICO Madness LOLsuit.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin is so disturbed and so desperately injured by the terrible things that Aaron Walker, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar, Lynn Thomas, and I are publishing about him that he has gone on vacation to Hawaii when his motion for a preliminary injunction against us in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is due to Judge Hazel on the 28th.

The judge has imposed some specific limits on what TDPK can file.

First, Plaintiff’s motion must be limited to the specific defendants identified in his request i.e., defendants Walker, Hoge, McCain, Thomas, and Akbar. …

 

Second, Plaintiff’s motion must be limited to specific conduct that has occurred since the filing of his SAC on June 24, 2014 and must describe with sufficient detail the exact harm caused by each specific defendant and the irreparable harm sought to be prevented by way of immediate injunctive relief.

 

Third, Plaintiff’s motion and accompanying memorandum may not exceed fifteen (15) pages, double spaced. See ECF No. 97 at 3. Plaintiff must file his motion by August 28, 2014. …

 

Fourth, Plaintiff’s motion must strictly comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, including the requirements for signatures and other identifying information contained in Rule 11(a), as well as the requirements of 11(b). Failure to comply with Rule 11(b) could result in sanctions issued by the Court sua sponte. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(3).

Perhaps, TDPK has figured out that he can’t come up with anything that can be filed within those limitations. We’ll see. Meanwhile, Judge Hazel noted when TDPK asked for more time to file his motion that

[a] preliminary injunction is either needed or it is not. If a preliminary injunction is needed, as Plaintiff contends …, it ought to be pursued with the degree of diligence and urgency for which it was intended to serve i.e. the prevention of irreparable harm. Because Plaintiff’s proposed “wait-and-see” approach is antithetical to that purpose, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Request. Plaintiff must file his Motion for Preliminary Injunction no later than August 28, 2014 and in strict accordance with the requirements set forth in the Court’s July 28, 2014 Letter Order, or notify the Court that he is withdrawing his request for leave to file the motion.

Stay tuned.

* * * * *

I suppose that Kimberlin would have found a way to file his motion for a preliminary injunction if he had wanted it badly enough. I didn’t think he would file, and everything proceeded as I had foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


This TKPOTD was published five years ago today as part of the wrap-up coverage of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. LOLsuit. It fairly well demonstrates that one the real purpose of that LOLsuit was a fishing expedition seeking information related to a principal source of The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s butthurt.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin kept whining that he had provided my codefendants and me with “thousands of paged of documents” and that we had given a copy of just one email during discovery in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit.

That’s true. He did get only one email, and I’m the one who gave it to him as part of my answer to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory 3.

What I gave him was an email that I had sent to Kimberlin Unmasked that wasn’t covered by codefendant privilege. It was an answer to a question about a recently passed Maryland gun law. TDPK got everything that he asked for that he was entitled to receive. He was very foolish in his choice of questions.

popcorn4bkHe was clearly focused on finding KU’s identity and showed no real interest in developing any sort of case against me. If Brett Kimberlin is lucky, Judge Hazel will throw out the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness on the motions to dismiss. Otherwise, he’ll be facing discovery conducted by each of the two dozen defendants.

#StupidIsAsStupidDoes

* * * * *

Meanwhile, it’s been months since The Dread Deadbeat Publisher Kimberlin has posted anything new at Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Billy Boy Unread, but a certain cockroach still seems to be active on the web.

Failing failures gotta fail.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Yesterday’s TKPOTD dealt with how The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s initial losses in his LOLsuit set up later one for dismissal under the legal doctrine of res judicata. The TKPOTD from five years ago today celebrates Res Judicata.

* * * * *

While Stacy McCain is contemplating a Res Judicata tattoo [partially broken link caused by Twitter suspending the @rsmccain account], those of you looking for a less personal comment should stop by The Hogewash Store and check out the selection of Res Judicata, The Grand Hog, Johnny Atsign, and Team Lickspittle merchandise.res_judicata_stuffMy Res Judicata travel mug full of coffee helped keep me awake during the drives from Westminster to Rockville last Monday and Tuesday.

* * * * *

IMHO, the Cafe Press model looks so much nicer in a Res Judicata t-shirt than she does in a Team Kimberlin nightie.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Two years ago today, The TKPOTD was about some of the most stupid questions The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin ever asked a witness during a trial or hearing.

* * * * *

I’ve been reviewing transcripts from a wide range of hearings and trials in LOLsuits and peace order petitions filed by The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin. Yesterday afternoon, I was going over the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial. The second day contains a couple of my favorite moments of Brett Kimberlin as The World’s Worst Pro Se Litigant™. (That trademark belongs to Stacy McCain; I should hit his tip jar as a royalty payment.) My very favorite has to be TDPK’s attempt to examine Stacy, and the episode is real proof that one should never try to outcrazy Stacy McCain.

While it wasn’t as entertaining, Kimberlin’s biggest tactical blunder occurred while he was examining Aaron Walker.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Okay, now when you call me a pedophile repeatedly —

MR. WALKER: Un-huh

MR. KIMBERLIN: You must have some basis for that. Tell what you tell the jury why you know, why you think that’s true? And where is the truth, where is the evidence?

And Aaron spent the next several minutes explaining why.

Pro Se Tip—Never ask a question unless you know the answer and that it will help your case.

* * * * *

I was sitting next to Stacy McCain during this portion of the trial, and we were both having a difficult time trying not to burst out laughing at the defense table.