Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Whenever the facts are not in his favor, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin starts whining about being victimized by false narratives as he spins his own bogus tales. The TKPOTD from three years ago today gives an example.

* * * * *

One of the problems that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin should be considering in the drafting of his omnibus opposition to the stack of motions to dismiss his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(3) which requires that

the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery …

For example, consider this from paragraph 249 of his second amended complaint.

ECF 135-249There is not only no evidence to support that contention, the evidence refutes it. With only one exception, I have never been in the same place as Brett Kimberlin other than in a courthouse (or its near environs such surrounding sidewalks or parking lots) for an open hearing where I was either a party or covering the open hearing for this blog. Obviously, when I was a party at a hearing, I had every right to be present. Similarly—as the judge told TDPK when he tried to have me thrown out of a courtroom during a hearing—members of the public have the right to attend open court hearings, and I have a First Amendment right to cover open hearings as a blogger. There’s no stalking there.

The exception occurred at the Carroll County Senior Center on 27 January, 2014, during the mediation session between Bill Schmalfeldt and me concerning the disposition of peace order violation charges against Schmalfeldt. Kimberlin was in the building. He had driven Schmalfeldt to the meeting. Of course, he had the right to give Schmalfeldt a ride, but the meeting was not open. He had no right to be hanging around the Senior Center during the meeting.

TDPK has provided transportation for Schmalfeldt for hearings in District Court in Howard County and District and Circuit Courts in Carroll County. He attended those hearings. He also attended a Hoge v. Schmalfeldt hearing in U. S. District Court in Baltimore. If the theory of hearing attendance that he wishes to apply to me is valid, then he has been stalking me. Fortunately for TDPK, that bit advice he’s had from Acme is wrong.

popcorn4bkOn the one hand, I suspect it will be somewhat exasperating to have to deal with yet another bogus court filing from TDPK. On the other, I do have a certain curiosity to see what sort of nonsense he throws out. He has until close of business next Monday to get his opposition to the court.

Tick, tock.

* * * * *

TDPK did file his omnibus opposition to our motions to dismiss. Judge Hazel evaluated it along with our motions and replies and wrote an order dismissing the LOLsuit. That order used one form or another of the word fail over thirty times in describing Kimberlin’s complaint and opposition to our motion.

Everything proceeded as I had foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin seems to project his own behavior onto others.ECF 135-124That’s from his second amended complaint for his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. It doesn’t pass the giggle test, especially with respect to Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, The Franklin Center, or RedState. No one in his right mind would believe that their coverage of Brett Kimberlin has had any significant effect on their Internet presence.

Yes, my coverage of TDPK has probably generated a significant percentage of the interest in Hogewash!, but I’ve published a mix of documented facts and satire. What few errors I’ve published have been corrected when they were verified. That doesn’t qualify as creating false narratives.

OTOH, many of the fundraising websites with DONATE buttons that benefit Justice Through Music Project … well, let’s just say they are very selective in what truth they might contain. False narratives? That’s not for me to say, but they don’t strike me as trustworthy.

timer-blackMeanwhile, the timer is ticking down. TDPK’s omnibus opposition to all the motions to dismiss his RICO Madness are due at close of business two weeks from today. Perhaps he will find some creative way to explain to the court why his paragraph 124 supports a claim upon which relief can be granted. He might even surprise us with a truthful narrative to support him claims.

Don’t hold your breath.

And in other news … there’s still no winner in the contest.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the false narratives about Brett Kimberlin that has circulated around the Internet is a fantasy about his being “exonerated” of his bombing and dope smuggling convictions and about his having received a substantial settlement. Here’s an example from Democratic Underground.

The truth is that Kimberlin had his parole revoked for two years in 1997 and wound up staying in prison until 2001. He managed to keep the Parole Commission in the dark concerning any parole violations, so in 2006 he was released from supervision. That’s not exactly an exoneration.

Notice that I said he kept the Parole Commission in the dark about parole violation. One of the usual conditions of parole is to refrain from association with other felons. Here’s the true narrative: While he was still under supervision, Brett Kimberlin hired Craig Gillette, who has a child pornography conviction, to work at Justice Through Music Project. According to Mrs. Kimberlin, Gillette lived with the Kimberlins and their children in their one-room apartment in the basement of Kimberlin’s mother’s house for an extended period.

#Loser

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Harassment and False Narratives are two of the recurring themes in The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s pleadings he files in all his vexatious lawsuits. He’s now filed what he hopes will be his second amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness, and both Harass/Harassment and False Narrative(s) appear throughout the 80+ pages of the document.

Care to guess how many times each appears?

To see the answers click “Continue reading.”
Continue reading