Tag Archives: Domestic Terrorism

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
Reply

Speaking of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Brett Kimberlin tried and, of course, failed, to cite them as an authority during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance LOLsuit. As noted in the TKPOTD from six years ago today, Judge Johnson (photo at left) wasn’t buying what The Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimber was selling.

* * * * *

For the last couple of days, I’ve been posting examples of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s incompetence structuring his arguments in court. TDPK was foolish enough to call Stacy McCain as a plaintiff’s witness in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. LOLsuit. During his direct examination of Stacy, TDPK tried to introduce evidence from the Southern Poverty Law Center. That resulted in the following exchange among Judge Johnson, Patrick Ostronic (the lawyer representing Aaron Walker, Stacy, and me), and Kimberlin—

THE COURT: So what does the Southern Poverty Law Center have to do with this case? I’m not asking you about Mr. McCain, I’m asking you about why are you asking him about the Southern Poverty Law Center?

MR. KIMBERLIN: I’m asking him the Southern Poverty Law Center is the leading, one of the leading civil rights organizations in the —

THE COURT: I understand all of that but what does it have to do with this case?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because —

THE COURT: And the claim that you are making against these gentlemen?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because Southern Poverty Law Center regularly outs racists –

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.

THE COURT: So what if they do. What does that have to do with this case? This case isn’t about racists or racism.

MR. KIMBERLIN: It’s about hate. It’s about hate. These people hate me and they do anything to destroy me.

THE COURT: Well but why are you asking this witness about the Southern Poverty Law Center? First of all he couldn’t testify as to anything they said or did because it wouldn’t be an exception to any hearsay rule. So you would never be able to get that in evidence anyway.

MR. KIMBERLIN: All right.

THE COURT: Your objection’s sustained.

The Rules of Evidence are not about virtue signaling.

* * * * *

There are interesting intersections among domestic terrorists.

A Letter and a Memorandum

Posted on by
1

AG Garland has testified it was the NSBA’s letter suggesting that parents protesting at school board meetings should be investigate as domestic terrorists that provided the basis for his memorandum directing the FBI and US Attorneys to investigate and prosecute parents for protesting against school boards and teachers who insist on indoctrinating children with critical race theory. Now, that the NSBA has apologized for their letter (see below), it would make sense for the Attorney General to withdraw his memorandum. Given that he has also testified that he sees no ethical problem with ordering such an investigation even though his son-in-law is founder of a business selling critical race theory teach materials, I doubt that he will do the right thing.

Nothing to See Here. Move Along.

Posted on by
Reply

Attorney General Merrick Garland has directed the FBI to investigate parents who are opposing the teaching of Critical Race Theory in their children’s schools. It is reported that Garland’s son-in-law is the co-founder of a company which sells CRT instructional materials to school districts.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Posted on by
1

As the TKPOTD from five years ago today says, most of this stuff about The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin and his minions is so weird that I could have made it up myself.

* * * * *

Chutzpah is often defined as  the sort of shameless arrogance that leads a man who has murdered his parents to plead for mercy because he’s an orphan. How about a convicted terrorist bomber running this organization?stopdomesticterror

I’m not making this up. Convicted Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin co-founded and runs Velvet Revolution US, and one of VRUS’s subsidiaries is Stop Domestic Terror.

* * * * *

Brett Kimberlin has sued me multiple times alleging defamation because I’ve called him a terrorist. Every time, he has lost and I have won. The first time was on the basis of truth. The remaining times were on the basis of res judicata