Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The TKPOTD from five years ago today examined one of the claims Brett Kimberlin made in his second federal RICO LOLsuit against me.

* * * * *

Here’s an interesting bit of information from The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s opposition to the motions to dismiss his Kimberlin v. Team Themis, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit.ECF 74-p21A loss in his earnings? Hmmmmm. That loss must have been relatively recent. The IRS Form 990s for Justice Through Music show him making $19,500 a year in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. (2014’s form doesn’t appear to have been filed yet.) Of course, TDPK’s claim about lost earnings will be easily checked if the suit gets into discovery.

Stay tuned.

* * * * *

Indeed, Kimberlin was lying. The Justice Through Music Project Form 990s through 2018 all show his compensation as $19,500 per year.

They also show an interesting trend in the not-for-profit’s income.

2013 $380,287
2014 $595,230
2015 $373,508
2016 $618,790
2017 $394,740
2018 $561,794

Of course, it could be purely coincidental that JTMP’s income spiked upward during election years. After all, as a 501(c)(3) entity, it isn’t supposed to engage in partisan political activity, and Kimberlin created the now defunct Velvet Revolution US as a 501(c)(4) which could engage in political advocacy.

Meanwhile, all to the Kimberlin-related websites, including jtmp dot org as of the time this post is being drafted, hosted in the U. S. have gone dark.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


I probably should have titled this post Brett Kimberlin and the Case of the Missing Websites. Seven years ago today, I had a couple of posts about Kimberlin-related websites. The TKPOTD was about a site that had disappeared.

* * * * *

The Gentle Readers who have been following The Saga of The Dread Pirate Kimberlin lo these many months may remember posts about a website called globalpharma dot biz. This was a site for a company that appeared to have a physical presence in Arizona but whose website was hosted in Holland on the same server as the Kimberlin-related off-shore sites. It’s name server was unmaskedhosting dot com, a domain apparently owned or controlled by Brett Kimberlin. globalpharma dot biz offered to sell me Schedule IV prescription drugs for sale with no prescriptions required.

When I checked yesterday afternoon, the website was missing.globalpharma_miaA bit of digging turned up this interesting information about the domain’s name server history.globalphama_nsChange of ownership?

Hmmmmm.

UPDATE—Here’s a couple of interesting thoughts that popped up while reviewing The Dread Pirate Kimberlin’s RICO suit against me. Neither it nor the state lawsuit he has filed mention any of my writing about globalpharma dot biz.

Also, there’s an interesting coincidence in the timing of globalpharma dot biz going dark. It happened around the time the RICO suit was being drafted and filed. I wonder if a review of 18 USC 1961 had anything to do with the site going down?

As used in this chapter—

(1) “racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; … (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States …

* * * * *

The second post, It’s Not Exactly Fraud … , was about a money raising site.

* * * * *

… but it looks kinda shady. The Dread Pirate Kimberlin’s “charity” Justice Through Music Project runs a website called pussyriotdefensefund dot org. Just looking at the name, it would not be unreasonable for someone to assume that the site was involved in raising funds to help with the legal defense for members of the Russian rock band that have been prosecuted.

Here’s the top of the site’s home page. (Click on the image to embiggen it.)pussyriotdefensefund_orgZooming in on the text show this:pussyriot_zoomSee, Gentle Reader, the site’s not really a fraud because it comes right out and tells you that the donations go to JTMP.

BTW, TDPK has filed a federal RICO accusing me of mail fraud and wire fraud because I asked you to donate to funds supporting other bloggers and because I am now one of the beneficiaries of a fund to defend against a frivolous and vexatious lawsuit from Kimberlin. If you believe that the BomberSuesBloggers fund is a scam, please don’t contribute. If you think that blogs such as Hogewash! should be able to publish about potential scams, even if they might be run by Brett Kimberlin, then please go over to the BomberSuesBloggers  [Dead link. We took the site down after we won the LOLsuit.] site and find out how you can help.

* * * * *

Kimberlin eventually pulled the plug on pussyriotdefensefund dot org. Perhaps it wasn’t generating enough cash flow to bother paying for its hosting. Or Kimberlin may have let lapse through inattention.

Whatever.

Meanwhile, the Justice Through Music Project website was still missing in action as of 9:30 pm ET, Saturday.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Alinsky’s Rule 5 says, “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon,” and pointage, laughery, and mockification has always been a part of this blog’s pushback against Team Kimberlin. One of the recurring themes has been to suggest that the Gentle Reader have a good supply of popcorn (or other entertainment treats) on hand while watching The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin flail away at his lawfare. That theme became enough of an annoyance to Kimberlin that he complained about it in various court filings. Eight years ago today, Hogewash! ran this post, Dread Pirate #BrettKimberlin and Four Food Groups.

* * * * *

For the Gentle Readers of Hogewash!:

For The Dread Pirate Kimberlin:

Bon appétit!

* * * * *

Mmmmmm. Popcorn.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the defining characteristics of Team Kimberlin has been their mouths writing checks that their asses couldn’t cash. This Bonus Prevarication Du Jour from seven years ago today offers an example.

* * * * *

@Mjanovic201310120129ZYes, my counsel of record in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit is pro bono. So are all the members of the team of lawyers from around the country backing him up. (The Popehat Signal is a marvelous thing. Thanks, Ken.) They are lawyers from across the political spectrum with a dedication to the First Amendment who see it as a civic and professional duty to defend it against such egregious attacks as Kimberlin’s.

Half-assed? I don’t think so, but a one-percent-assed effort by the assembled team would probably be sufficient to overcome Kimberlin’s pitiful suit.

Definitely lose? Badly? Well, we will see who winds up owing whom. Even a dismissal could leave Brett Kimberlin responsible for costs and my expenses and legal fees. Legal fees? Yes, legal fees. My lawyer is pro bono for me but not for Kimberlin. Legal fees.

AFTERWORD—Bill Schmalfeldt seems to think that there is some significance to the fact that my lawyer is not a member of the Maryland State Bar Association, a voluntary organization. Membership in that organization should not be confused with being admitted to practice law in Maryland. I wonder if the Cabin Boy is aware that the two Maryland lawyers who are on the board of Velvet Revolution US, Jeffery R. Cohen and Kevin Zeese, also chose not to belong to the Maryland State Bar Association? The Cabin Boy has also noticed that my lawyer is also a CPA. Trust me, Gentle Reader; that’s going to be a plus.

* * * * *

Speaking of uncashed, or more accurately, unwritten, checks, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin still owes the sanctions and court costs taxed against him in several of his LOLsuits.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


I’ve made a point of posting as much as possible of The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s legal filings. His first lawfare attack on me occurred in July, 2013, when he filed a false Application for Statement of Charges against me alleging that I has stalked and harassed him. Because the State’s Attorney’s Office dropped the charges and sought to have them expunged, I wasn’t able to see exactly what Kimberlin had claimed until I was able to get the case unsealed. (I needed it unsealed so that I could sue for malicious prosecution.)  I finally got around to publishing his bogus allegations four years ago today.

* * * * *

While I’ve been preparing discovery requests for the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit, I noticed that I’ve never published the Application for Statement of Charges that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin filed against me in 2013. Last November, I petitioned the District Court to be allowed to inspect and have a copy of the case file. Now that the expungement has been vacated and anyone can get a copy, I might as well post it. Here’s the case docket as I received it last November.

TDPK has said that he asked for the expungement. As the Gentle Reader can see, it was the State’s Attorney’s Office who asked for the expungement, not Kimberlin.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

* * * * *

The Application for Statement of Charges was signed under penalty of perjury. The Gentle Reader should not be shocked that a convicted perjurer would perjure himself again.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


I’m so old, I remember when journalists were still generally called reporters and the good ones at least pretended to take a “just the facts” approach to the news. OTOH, I’m older than any of the alleged journalists associated with Team Kimberlin, so it may be they never really were exposed to good reporting. That may explain the situation discussed in the Prevarication Du Jour from seven years ago today.

* * * * *

Bill Schmalfeldt tweeted this in the context of comments about his using a threat to cause a woman to lose her children unless she gave him him information.ffr201310021523Z

Here’s what Schmalfeldt actually wrote to the woman.BSthreatOBNSchmalfeldt maintains that he was behaving in an ethical manner as a journalist when he sent that message. The Cabin Boy also touts the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists. Let’s examine how the tactic he used with this potential source fits within that Code. This item seem applicable.

Journalists should:

— Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.

As near as I can tell, nothing in the story he was “investigating” had anything to do with the woman’s children or whether or not they should be taken from her. It seems that he was simply using the threat as a bludgeon to get her to “play smart” and give him the information he wanted. It’s unclear that she was even a direct part of the story. IANAL, but that message seems very close to blackmail or extortion, and since it was sent via interstate communications, a violation of federal law.

And what compassion was he showing the children who would have been affected by his threats?

But the Cabin Boy says he’s ethical … because JOURNALIST!

UPDATE—Stacy McCain appears to question Schmalfeldt’s journalistic ethics also.

* * * * *

The alleged desire of Cabin Boy™ (Schmalfeldt) and Bunny Boy (aka Matt Osborne) to have access to sealed documents was the reason that Brett Kimberlin cited to a court filing seeking to unseal discovery in the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit. The court didn’t relax its protective order, so Kimberlin’s fishing expedition failed.

BTW, when Brett Kimberlin tried to use sealed discovery from Frey during the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. trial, Judge Hecker said that the federal court’s order wasn’t his to enforce and that Kimberlin could try to introduce the documents. Then, the judge also noted Kimberlin should consider the possible consequences of disobeying the federal court. Kimberlin chickened out.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Brett Kimberlin never should have gone after bloggers who were writing truthful things about him. He never should have sued blogger, especially me, for defamation. The TKPOTD for six years ago today outlines what he lost when the court threw out the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. nuisance LOLsuit.

* * * * *

Most of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s vexatious Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit died before the trial stated when Judge McGann threw out five of the seven counts in his complaint on summary judgment. During the trial, Judge Johnson found that TDPK hadn’t presented a “scintilla” of evidence to support the remaining defamation and false light counts and granted a directed verdict in favor of us defendants.

As a matter of law, we defendants now have findings on the merits that we did not engage in malicious prosecution against Brett Kimberlin, that we did not conspire to abuse process against Brett Kimberlin, that we did not defame Brett Kimberlin, that we did not engage in false light invasion of Brett Kimberlin’s privacy, that we did not harass Brett Kimberlin, that we did not intentional inflict emotional distress on Brett Kimberlin, and that that we did not stalk Brett Kimberlin. The claims made by Brett Kimberlin were found to have no basis in fact. That includes the following allegations specifically made in his second amended complaint:

• There is no evidence for his claim that he was assaulted by Aaron Walker.
• There is no evidence for his claim that Aaron Walker or I suborned perjury from Tetyana Kimberlin.
• There is no evidence for his claim that Tetyana Kimberlin’s accusation against him of third degree sexual offense was false.

Furthermore, the court ruled that we did not defame TDPK or place him in a false light when we said or wrote the following things about which he complained in his suit:

• That he caused Aaron Walker to be fired from his job.
• That any of us believe he is a pedophile.
• That he has used mentally abusive tactics against his wife.
• That he is evil.
• That he is a misogynist.
• And all the other things he cited in his second amended complaint.

TDPK’s very own false narrative has been gutted. It’s now roadkill, lying open for all to see. It isn’t pretty. But lies never are when you see them for what they are.

Meanwhile, TDPK has his omnibus answer to all the motions to dismiss in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness due on 15 October.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

* * * * *

Kimberlin is a slow learner. He kept suing bloggers, including me. I argued in subsequent suits that his reputation was so poor because of his history as a serial bomber that it was impossible to defame him, so he had no grounds to sue for defamation. Eventually, one of the courts agreed with me. It granted defendants dismissal for Kimberlin’ failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because his reputation made him defamation proof.

It appears that Kimberlin has refrained from further litigation since his Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, et al. RIOC 3 LOLsuit was dismissed, but he’s found other project to fail at. He failed in his election protection activities in 2016. He got scammed out of $9,000 when the dirt he thought he was buying on the Trump administration turned out to be bogus. And it’s been over a week since his @itstime_2020 account had a fresh tweet or picked up a follower. It still only has 2.

Failing failures gotta fail.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the claims that the Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin made in his LOLsuits is that people had made money off of writing about him and his activities. Of course, people make money writing about other people all the time. Folks are willing to pay for interesting, informative, or entertain writing that tells stories about other people. Kimberlin was never able to connect a defendant’s writing about him to any injury he suffered. More important, he was never able to show that anyone’s reporting about him was false. The TKPOTD from six years ago today deals with one of his futile attempts to follow the money.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin seemed especially interested in this blog’s ability to raise money. Here’s part of his direct examination of me during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit trial.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Right, so and every day you have a post called Team Kimberlin Post of the Day?

MR. HOGE: That’s one of the features of my blog.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Right, uh-huh. And you also have a donate button on your blog where you can raise money and ask people to donate to you, right?

MR. HOGE: Actually it’s called a tip jar, but yes.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Yeah, tip jar, uh-huh. Okay, and you started this campaign called Everybody Blog about the Howard County Prosecutors. Can you tell just why that was started?

MR. HOGE: Yes, the —

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.

THE COURT: Overruled.

MR. HOGE: Yes, Mr. Walker and his wife showed me credible evidence that you had, in fact, stalked them in the parking lot of the Howard County District Courthouse in Ellicott City. And when Mr. Walker and his wife went to talk with the State’s Attorney’s Office they were told by Assistant State’s Attorney Brewer that if they didn’t want to be harassed they should stay out of Maryland. And that didn’t strike me as responsible way for a State’s Attorney’s Office whether they’re going to nolle pross the, and not follow-up on charge or not, that just struck me as a very unfortunate attitude for a State’s Attorney’s Office. And so I thought they should be held accountable for it.

MR. KIMBERLIN: So you started this campaign and had people calling. How did it work?

MR. HOGE: Well basically the idea was that people should ask the State’s Attorney himself if that was, in fact, his policy.

MR. KIMBERLIN: So that’s where all this Maryland is for Stalkers kind of —

MR. HOGE: I have no idea where exactly that came from. I have seen that there was a blogger who for a short time had on Zazzle which is one of these internet sales companies a bumper sticker that said that. I think it was probably a parody on Virginia being for Lovers.

He brought up the Maryland is for Stalkers bumper sticker while Aaron Walker was on the stand as well. I don’t believe that it has been a very big seller, but it sure got under his skin. Of course, it’s entirely possible that it generated more sales than any of the Team Kimberlin merchandise that was offered by Brietbart Unmasked.

I wonder … is fundraising so precarious at JTMP and VRUS that TDPK is now jealous of my minor league blog?

Oh … one more thing … it seems to annoy Brett Kimberlin for folks to hit my Tip Jar.

* * * * *

I suspect that Kimberlin’s failure to generate traffic to online DONATE button may have made it more difficult to provide a smoke screen for funding from other sources.

For example, he seems to have vanishingly small traffic at the itstime2020 dot org site.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Brett Kimberlin’s LOLsuits have failed because he has never been able to put together a logical argument that he has suffered any injury from truthful report about hime, his associates, and their activities. He’s had particular difficulty understanding what is admissible under the Rules of Evidence. The TKPOTD from six years ago today deals with one of the many times he was stopped by the judge enforcing those rules during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial.

* * * * *

It was pretty obvious from the load of … ah … junk he gave us in discovery for the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin didn’t understand the rules of evidence or how to properly structure his case. He proved both during the trial. For example, consider this question he was never able to ask of Stacy McCain because it dealt with hearsay.

MR. KIMBERLIN: So do you know what the Southern Poverty Law Center is?

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection Your Honor.

THE COURT: What does the Southern Poverty Law Center have to do with this case?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well Mr. McCain has —

THE COURT: The Southern Poverty Law Center, what does that have to do with this case?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Mr. McCain is considered a neo-confederate — is one —

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Well —

MR. KIMBERLIN: And the Southern Poverty Law Center

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Hold on a second. Counsel I appreciate you objecting to my question but I’m not going to overrule myself. That’s not something I do. So what does the Southern Poverty Law Center have to do with this case? I’m not asking you about Mr. McCain, I’m asking you about why are you asking him about the Southern Poverty Law Center?

MR. KIMBERLIN: I’m asking him the Southern Poverty Law Center is the leading, one of the leading civil rights organizations in the —

THE COURT: I understand all of that but what does it have to do with this case?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because —

THE COURT: And the claim that you are making against these gentlemen?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because Southern Poverty Law Center regularly outs racists —

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.

THE COURT: So what if they do. What does that have to do with this case? This case isn’t about racists or racism.

MR. KIMBERLIN: It’s about hate. It’s about hate. These people hate me and they do anything to destroy me.

THE COURT: Well but why are you asking this witness about the Southern Poverty Law Center? First of all he couldn’t testify as to anything they said or did because it wouldn’t be an exception to any hearsay rule. So you would never be able to get that in evidence anyway.

MR. KIMBERLIN: All right.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Mr.—

THE COURT: Your objection’s sustained.

Of course, TDPK was trying to paint Stacy McCain as a racist, and that’s nonsense. Furthermore, given some of the racial epithets that TDPK is on record as have said and written, it was particularly unseemly for him to be trying to tar anyone else with that brush.

Even if Stacy or I or any of our codefendants were racist, that had no bearing on whether or not what we said and wrote was true, and TDPK had to prove that our words were false. Stupid is as stupid does, and TDPK tried to bring up racism a second time.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Have you ever been identified as a member of the hate group League of the South?

THE COURT: I’m sorry, what was that, what group?

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.

MR. KIMBERLIN: League of the South.

THE COURT: League of the South?

MR. KIMBERLIN: It’s like an offshoot of the KKK.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.

MR. KIMBERLIN: It believes in —

THE COURT: What’s that relevant to, sir?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well he brought it up.

THE COURT: He didn’t bring up the League of the South.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Huh?

THE COURT: He didn’t bring up the League of the South.

MR. KIMBERLIN: He talked about he’s not a racist.

THE COURT: Well the fact that he brought it up without objection doesn’t make it relevant. I mean what is the jury going to do with this? We’re not here about whether anybody is a racist or not, are we?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well no, but he’s tried —

MR. MCCAIN: You’re white by the way.

Never try to outcrazy Stacy McCain.

* * * * *

It was almost worth all the hassle of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. LOLsuit to be able to watch Kimberlin destroy his own case by calling Aaron Walker, Ali Alexander, Stacy McCain, and Me at his witnesses. All we had to do to discredit his imagined narrative was to tell the truth. I suppose he was so unfamiliar with the truth that it caught him off guard.

BTW, the foreman of the jury (who was black) had been rolling his eyes as he listened to Kimberlin’s line of questioning, and he chuckled at Stacy’s “You’re white by the way” comment.

Meanwhile back in 2020, it looks as if no one is buying into Kimberlin’s latest false narratives. The @itstime_2020 Twitter account hasn’t seen any new tweets for over a week, and itstie2020 dot org’s global popularity ranking is still below 14,000,000. Also, while other English language Ukrainian news sites (e.g., Unian)  have been covering the Senate report on Hunter Biden’s foreign deals, empr dot media has ignored the story.

The Truth is out there. It’s just not often found on one of Kimberlin’s websites.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The TKPOTD for four years ago today gave an accounting of Team Kimberlin’s LOLsiuits as of that date.

* * * * *

All of these cases have some things in common:

Kimberlin v. Walker, et al.; Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (I) (aka RICO Madness); Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (II) (aka RICO Retread); Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams LLP, et al. (I) (aka RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo); Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams LLP, et al. (II) (aka RICO 2 Retread); Schmalfeldt v. Hoge, et al. (I) (aka LOLsuit I); Hoge v. Schmalfeldt counterclaims (aka LOLsuit II); Schmalfeldt v. Johnson, et al. (aka LOLsuit III); Schmalfeldt v. Hoge, et al. (II) (aka LOLsuit IV); Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al. (I) (aka LOLsuit V); Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al. (II) (aka LOLsuit VI); and Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al. (III) (aka LOLsuit VII).

Each was accompanied by great forecasts of doom for the defendants. Every time any motion or ruling went in the favor of the plaintiff, there were expansive claims made concerning the expected victory by the plaintiff. And the defendants won every single one of ’em.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

* * * * *

We can add Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, et al. (aka RICO 2), Kimberlin v. McConnell, et al. (aka Supreme Nonsense), and Schmalfeldt v. Grady, et al. (IV) (aka LOLsuit VIII: Avoiding Contact) to the win column for defendants.

Q’pala!

Meanwhile, no one over at the It’s Time 2020 operation seems to have noticed any significant news relating to the November election. As of 8 pm Sunday evening, there have been no new tweet from the @itstime_2020 account since 15 September, and there doesn’t seem to be anything posted on the itstime2020 dot org website after 28 August.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The following is from the TKPOTD published six years ago today.

* * * * *

res_judicata_mugsOf course, one of TDPK’s claims is that I’ve been using my reporting on his activities to raise money by defrauding the Gentle Readers who hit my Tip Jar. He has yet to explain how that injures him. In any event, I’m always thankful for reader support.

You can also support the blog by shopping at The Hogewash Store or shopping via the Amazon link on the Home page.

Whichever means you chose, your support helps keep this blog on the air.

* * * * *

And your support is greatly appreciated!

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the most easily falsifiable claims made by Brett Kimberlin in the Kimberlin v. Most of the Rest of the Universe, et al. RICO Remnant LOLsuit was … oh, here’s the TKPOTD from five years ago today.

* * * * *

One of the the things The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin whines about in his Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. LOLsuit is how he feels defamed because he’s been called a terrorist. He would have the court believe that being called a terrorist after 15 October, 2010, portrayed him in a false light.

If the Gentle Reader does a Google search on >”brett kimberlin” + terrorist< that is time limited to before 2010, the top results will look something like this—Pre2010

That first result is the Wikipedia “Kimberlin” page which contains a link to the article about Brett Kimberlin. While the “Kimberlin” page was created in 2008, the article about TDPK wasn’t created until 2012. Gasp! Wikipedia refers to Kimberlin as a terrorist! <sarc>It must be part of the conspiracy!</sarc>

The next hit is a Baltimore Sun article from 1996 reviewing Mark Singer’s book Citizen K. It refers to Kimberlin as a terrorist. The third hit is a piece from Daily Kos that refers to Kimberlin as a bomber “who terrorized the city of Speedway, Indiana …” Neither the BS nor Daily Kos qualify as rightwing nut job publications.

And there are plenty more references to Kimberlin’s history as a bomber/terrorist/criminal. His reputation was out there on the Internet well before 2010 and, certainly, well before I began blogging in 2011.

Whiner.

* * * * *

If The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin had never sued me, I would never have argued that he was failing to state a claim for defamation because his reputation as a serial bomber was so bad that there was no way to lower the public’s opinion of him; other defendants wouldn’t have echoed that argument in their motions to dismiss; and no court would have dismissed one of Kimberlin’s LOLsuits on that basis. Now, a court has found that his reputation is so bad that he’s defamation proof.

His worst mistake in all of his litigation was to sue me.

Meanwhile, his latest attempt at relevance seems to be foundering. itstime2020 dot org has essentially no traffic, and the@ itstime_2020 Twitter account still only has two followers.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The reason why Brett Kimberlin hasn’t won any of the lawsuits he filed as part of his attempt to use lawfare to silence truth reporting about him seems to be that he doesn’t understand how to structure a rational argument based on evidence. It has often seemed that he could not differentiate between the Real World and the fantasy realm of his wishes. The TKPOD from six years ago today contained an excerpt of a Judge Johnson’s frustrated attempt to explain to Kimberlin why he had to place actual testimony and documents into evidence in order to have a case for the jury to consider in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al.LOLsuit.

* * * * *

After The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin rested his case during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial, we defendants moved for a directed verdict in our favor because he had not presented evidence establishing the element of defamation or false light. Here is a small part of Judge Johnson’s extended colloquy with TDPK on whether he had shown that what we said and wrote about him was false.

THE COURT: I’m not asking you to prove anything. I’m asking you who in this courtroom yesterday or today said that those statements were false?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Your honor, in a defamation case —

THE COURT: You hate answering questions —

MR. KIMBERLIN: No, no, I’m just trying to —

THE COURT: Who said it was false?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Who said it was false? They —

THE COURT: Did you want to read this? I mean —

MR. KIMBERLIN: I know what it says —

THE COURT: I didn’t make this up. This is Maryland law.

MR. KIMBERLIN: I think that the jury has to make that call, whether it’s false. And whether —

THE COURT: But there has to be some evidence. They just can’t pull things out of the air. A jury, they just can’t go back there and decide what they want to decide. I have to give them instructions on the law. And the instructions on defamation — Maryland pattern jury instruction 12.1 “a defamatory statement is a false statement about another person that exposes that person to public scorn, hatred” — so nobody in here, in this case said that they hated you, you haven’t put any evidence up that they hated you — “contempt or ridicule” — there’s no evidence of that — “thereby discouraging others in the community from having a good opinion of or from associating or dealing with the person. Defamation may result from a statement communicated to a third person either orally or in writing.” And here you have — I’ll call them, well, bloggers, I guess they’re reporters — reporting stories and bantering back and forth regarding stories that, I think it originated, the whole thing started back in Indiana many, many, many years ago. And so what is the jury going to — how are they going to consider whether there was public scorn?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Your honor —

THE COURT: This’ll go lot faster if you try to answer my question. If you don’t have an answer, say you don’t have an answer.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Being called a pedophile is automatically public scorn, I mean —

THE COURT: Look, I’m getting — you’ve said that, I understand it. But I’m focusing on the Maryland law that I have to tell the jury. Now what I’m asking you — let’s take it one by one. The statement has to — you have get to to contempt. Any evidence of that?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Well, I put my daughter on the stand and she testified that we had suffered —

THE COURT: That she had suffered?

MR. KIMBERLIN: No, that our family had suffered. That I had suffered.

THE COURT: Look, you’re the only party in this case.

Narratives are not false just because TDPK doesn’t like them. There were very few possible witnesses that Kimberlin could have produced who could have testified of their firsthand knowledge that he had not engaged in any of the behavior that led folks to be suspicious of him. There were the women who were the girls he was allegedly involved with in Indiana (as reported by Mark Singer). There was his estranged wife who did not come to court to support him. There was the possibility of his own testimony, given that the judge seemed willing to bend the Maryland Rule on perjurers and let him testify. No one else would have been a competent witness.

I suspect that TDPK stayed off the stand because he was afraid of cross examination and being caught in perjury.

popcorn4bkJudge Johnson ruled in our favor. TDPK is making noises about an appeal and a second federal lawsuit. It seems that he’s beginning to understand that the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is doomed. It will be interesting to see what federal issue he might use in a second federal suit.

I’m sure Acme is working overtime.

* * * * *

Kimberlin has never let the Truth get in the way of his false narratives, which may explain why he no longer appears to have credibility with many of the people who used to find him useful.

While I was checking on the status of the itstime2020 dot org website on Thursday evening, I found that Kimberlin has moved the old velvetrevolution dot us domain from hosting on a Fintel Associates server to the xeonhosting dot org server in Holland that hosts breitbartunmasked dot com, empr dot media, greencasamaryland dot org, itstime202 dot org, and kelsiekimberlin dot com. However, I was unable to connect to velvetrevolution dot org at its new IP address.The old VRUS website seems to have suffered a glitch while being moved between servers. I suppose Kimberlin can get one of the expert hackers who helped him protect the 2016 election to fix the problem.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


This TKPOTD from five years ago today disassembles one of the more obviously false narratives Brett Kimberlin tried to spin about me in order to keep his RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit alive. He added me to the suit just before he filed it when he discovered that the statue of limitations had run out on the Team Themis defendants. He thought he could keep the suit viable by adding me to his imagined conspiracy hoping that some I might have done could be tied to Team Themis.

* * * * *

This is from The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s opposition to the U. S. Chamber of Commerce’s motion to dismiss the Kimberlin v. Team Themis, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit.

ECF 67-p8

So now, in addition to being Paul Krendler, I’m a member of the “intelligence community.”

Uh, huh. I’ve been working as a government contractor since 2000, but it was for NASA not the NSA.nasa_nsa

NASA. NSA. Perhaps TDPK needs to buy another vowel.

* * * * *

Failing failures gotta fail, so the Gentle Reader should not be surprised to learn that as of 10 pm ET Wednesday evening, the status of the @Itstime_2020 Twitter account was as follows:

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Three years ago today, I reached an important milestone in the LOLsuits Brett Kimberlin had filed against me. Here’s that day’s TKPOTD.

* * * * *

For the first time in over four years, I don’t have a lawsuit or the appeal of a lawsuit from Brett Kimberlin pending against me. Kimberlin’s attempts to use lawfare to suppress the First Amendment rights of people who have written and spoken truthful things about him have been abject failures against those of us who stood up to him. Some of the victims of his lawfare settled for various reasons of their own, but taken as a whole, the phrase “Kimberlin has failed” is a good summation of his LOLsuits.

I beat him in four vexatious civil suits, three frivolous appeals, two sets of false criminal charges, and a bogus peace order petition. I was awarded sanctions in two of the lawsuits and one of the appeals, and I have instructed an attorney to begin the collection process.

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin still has two LOLsuits on appeal. The Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams LLP, et al. RICO 2 Retread Appeal is at the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. (He didn’t include me in that case, perhaps having finally figured out how res judicata works in Maryland.) The Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant Appeal has gone to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. I’m not going very far out on a limb to predict that Kimberlin will lose both.

He also has one other LOLsuit in limbo in the U. S. District Court for the District of Maryland. It’s styled Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, et al. The complaint is sealed, so I don’t know what TDPK’s claims are, but it’s almost a year old, and the court has still not allowed summonses to be issued to the defendants. I’m going to speculate that the case will be dismissed with prejudice sua sponte as soon as the Fourth Circuit dismisses the Frey appeal. Patrick Frey is a codefendant in the Breitbart Holdings case. If TDPK has alleged a conspiracy (as he usually does), then Patterico’s res judicata defense should also apply to his “co-conspirators.” That will mean that “Kimberlin has failed” to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

* * * * *

The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin managed to maintain his perfect 0.000 batting average by losing both the Breitbart Holdings RICO 3 case and the Frey appeal.

Speaking of losing, …There were still no follower for this account as of 11:15 pm ET Tuesday evening.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the basic rules of examining a witness in a trial is to never ask a question unless you already know the answer. One of the reasons that Brett Kimberlin failed to make his case during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial was that he assumed that he could put the defendants on the stand and that we would provide answers that fit his false narrative rather than the truth. The TKPOTD from six years ago today recounts a couple of his failures to get defendants to support his case.

* * * * *

A significant feature of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s own false narrative that he spins in his second amended complaint for his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is a story about how my codefendants and I have sought to have him arrested.ECF 135-123

Here’s part of TDPK’s direct examination of Aaron Walker during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit that shows him trying to sell his tale during that trial.

MR. KIMBERLIN: I mean, you filed charges to have me arrested? You asked —

MR. WALKER: No. I don’t believe the charges would cause you to be arrested.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Have you —

MR. WALKER: At most, most, maybe if we’re lucky, convicted.

MR. KIMBERLIN: But you wanted me to get arrested. You asked that I be arrested.

MR. WALKER: You went to court and —

MR. KIMBERLIN: I’m asking you a simple question. Yes or no?

MR. WALKER: You committed multiple crimes against me —

MR. KIMBERLIN: I’m asking —

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, your honor. Badgering his own witness, here.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Yes or no. Have you asked that I be arrested.

THE COURT: Well, the witness is doing fine.

MR. WALKER: You have committed multiple crimes against myself —

MR. KIMBERLIN: I asked a simple question. Yes, or no.

MR. WALKER: — and my wife. And so I have sought justice against you. That is correct

He also tried get me to admit to writing blog posts saying that he should be arrested.

MR. KIMBERLIN: So, you have — have you ever — have you wanted to get me arrested? Have you asked that I be arrested?

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.

MR. KIMBERLIN: Have you ever stated —

THE COURT: Overruled.

MR. KIMBERLIN: — on your blog that you want me arrested?

MR. HOGE: Not to my knowledge. I have no recollection of ever saying that on my blog.

Now it is true that both Aaron Walker and I have filed Applications for Statement of Charges against TDPK, and various District Court Commissioners charged him with various misdemeanors. Those charges resulted in summonses not arrest warrants. AFAIK, the only person who filed any charge that might have resulted in his arrest was Mrs. Kimberlin.

For the record, let me state again that my goal is to see Brett Kimberlin brought to justice. Whether that requires his arrest is not up to me.

* * * * *

Speaking of failures, this was the status of the @itstime_2020 Twitter account at 11 pm ET Saturday—

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Ah, the Third of September, a dual anniversary. It was on 3 September, 2012, that a person I then referred to as “Some bozo calling himself the Liberal Grouch” came to my attention by threatening. to sue Aaron Walker for defamation. And on this date in 2015, the first defendants were dismissed from Brett Kimberlin’s RICO Retread LOLsuit. I reported on the 2015 hearing in this post titled A Mixed Bag.

* * * * *

Here’s a brief summary of this morning’s hearing in the Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. RICO Retread LOLsuit.

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberln was sanctioned for $760 in attorney’s fees because he was a no-show at the previous hearing.

The case was dismissed against Michelle Malkin, Twitchy, Breitbart, Glenn Beck, The Blaze, and Mercury Radio Arts for lack of person jurisdiction.

Aaron Walker was told to refile his motion to dismiss for technical reasons.

TDPK has been given 15 days to try to figure out how to properly amend his complaint to get around my motion to dismiss for improper venue.

More details later.

UPDATE—The dismissals for Michelle Malkin and the others were also based on Kimberlin’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

* * * * *

IIRC, Bill Schmalfeldt never got around to suing Aaron Walker, but Aaron did successfully represent two of the defendants in one of the Cabin Boy’s™ LOLsuits.

Oh, and one of the grounds for dismissal of the RICO Retread LOLsuit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted was that the court found that Brett Kimberlin’s reputation was so bad that he was defamation proof, that is was not possible to defame him.

Meanwhile, the @ItsTime_2020 Twitter account still didn’t have any followers as of 10 pm ET Wednesday evening.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


OPSEC is a military acronym for Operation Security. Team Kimberlin’s OPSEC is very poor as the TKPOTD from three years ago today demonstrates.

* * * * *

The document below was filed by the Kimberlins as part of a cross appeal in the Walker v. Maryland, et al. case in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. it contains emails which I showed to Brett Kimberlin during the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. trial and which he identified as being his.

Here are blowups of the address blocks.

Note the BCC addressee: Fintel

When I asked The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin, “What is Fintel?”, he was stunned for a few seconds and finally responded that it was an address he sent email that he wanted to save. When I asked, “So you are Fintel?”, he stammered a bit of a non-response.

I think he had suddenly realized that he had screwed up big time. The emails did not wind up being admitted into evidence because the judge did not allow me to pursue the line of questioning I was trying to develop. However, the Gentle Reader may remember that the Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Billy Boy Unread About page used to say that BU is owned by Almighty Media. Almighty Media also has another website, the rather neglected almightmedia dot com. As part of my search for the address of Almighty Media for service of process in the recent lawsuit, I issued the following subpoena to its/their web hosting provider.

TDPK filed a motion to quash the subpoena. That motion was denied, but wouldn’t have made any difference. The service provider had promptly provided the billing information which was identical to the the current billing information for the server hosting breitbartunmasked dot com and jtmp dot org.

Fintel Associates?

Hmmmmm.

Stay tuned.

* * * * *

Delusions of competence is a phase that comes to mind.

Oh, and as of 11:51 pm ET Sunday evening—

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Past performance is no guarantee of future results, but it’s the way to bet—

Dope Smuggling—caught, pleaded guilty

Serial Bombing—caught, convicted, paroled, sentence expires in 2030

Pro-Se Lawfare—four state defamation LOLsuits, one fraudulent default judgment, one directed verdict for defendants, two dismissals

Pro-Se Lawfare—six peace order petitions, all denied

Pro-Se Lawfare—five false criminal complaints, all dropped for lack of evidence

Pro-Se Lawfare—five federal LOLsuits, all dismissed

Music Career—neither of the bands Epoxy nor Op-Critical was successful

Election Protection 2016—Trump won

Dirt Digging 2017—got scammed by fake financial records

Election Protection 2020—as of 10:05 pm ET yesterday @ItsTime_2020 still didn’t have a single follower.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


False narratives. That’s what Brett Kimberlin called truthful reporting about him and his activities. As the TKPOTD for five years ago today noted, he used that term quite a bit in the false claims he made in his various LOLsuits.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin sure does like the phrase “false narrative(s).” For example, …false narrativesNot once does he follow up on any claim that a “narrative” is “false” with specific facts proving his allegation.

* * * * *

The one time The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin managed to get a case to trial, he lost because he had no specific facts to place in evidence in support of his allegations.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Today is the sixth anniversary of the failure of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nusiance LOLsuit. The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin had already had five of the seven counts of his complaint thrown out at the summary judgment phase of the case. The remaining defamation and false light claims died when he failed to present any evidence that my codefendants and I has said or written anything thing about him that was false. The judge stopped the trial after Kimberlin rested his case and granted a verdict in our favor.

While the trail was being held, Bill Schmalfeldt was engaged in PR tweeting on Kimberlin’s behalf. I published this post titled The Cabin Boy™ Gets One Right For A Change early in the morning six years ago today before the second day of the trial had started.

* * * * *

He pontificates thusly:rnusa201408111139ZMr. & Mrs. Stranahan, a mother in Wisconsin, a dentist in Pennsylvania, Chris Heather, Ali Akbar, Mr. & Mrs. Causey, Mr. & Mrs. Walker, Mrs. Hoge, and several others were unavailable for comment.

My comment is unprintable.

* * * * *

It took several more losses before either The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin or the Cabin Boy™ began to learn they were punching beyond their reach and fighting in a class well above their intellectual weight. Indeed, I am not sure they have completely grasped the full nature of their folly yet.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Six years ago, my codefendants and I in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance LOLsuit were in the final stages of preparation for the trial. The In Re Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. post from six years ago today provided a short history of how I came the be sued by Brett Kimberlin.

* * * * *

We go to trial on Monday. Aaron Walker, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar and I are confident that we will be vindicated. After I return from work today, the weekend will be spent preparing for the trial. Blogging is likely to be very light for the next few days.

I got involved in all this when I became aware of Brett Kimberlin’s anti-First-Amendment activities, especially his attempt to use a peace order to unconstitutionally gag Aaron and his calls to Stacy’s wife’s employer that resulted in the McCain family moving to an undisclosed location. I stuck with the story and was able to cover the various trials and hearing in nearby courts during 2012.  By late 2012, I had become a target of Team Kimberlin as well. By 2013, I became enmeshed in the legal wrangling myself.

I’m looking forward to the trial, not because I enjoy being sued, but because it will bring closure to one part of that wrangling.

I’d like to thank all you folks who have been supportive of my codefendants and me this past year. The best way that you can support us now is with your prayers. The second best is by supporting the Bomber Sues Bloggers [Dead link. That site is no longer active. Thank you to everyone who donated.] fund. Our lawyer is pro bono, but there are other expenses incurred in our defense. The certified transcript for the 1 July hearing cost about $120. Another thing that you can all do is refrain from speculating on either side’s trial strategy. Brett Kimberlin is really quite a doofus in a courtroom. Please don’t give him any hints.

For now, I won’t be writing about this case. There’s plenty of other Team Kimberlin stuff to publish. There’ll be plenty to write about concerning Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. after the verdict.

Stay tuned.

* * * * *

After losing that first LOLsuit, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin promise us defendants “lawsuits for the rest of their lives,” and he kept that promise for several years. He hasn’t sued me since he lost the Kimberlin v. Team Themis RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit, but there are still open matters from those cases he brought against me. Therefore, …

I’m not done with him yet.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The TKPOTD for six years ago today dealt with the meaning of words.

* * * * *

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin keeps using these words.BK v AW 2013-71That example is from his second amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit.

odi·ous adj. \ˈō-dē-əs\ : causing strong dislike; arousing or causing repugnance.

in·fa·mous adj. \ˈin-fə-məs\ : well known for being bad or evil.

frighten verb \ˈfrī-tən\ : to cause (someone) to become afraid.
frightened • fright·en·ing

I can understand how someone might have a strong dislike for a person who set a time bomb in the parking lot of a high school football game. Someone who was convicted of a series of high-profile bombings might be considered to have become infamous. And being frightened of such a person is a perfectly reasonable reaction.

#IfTheShoeFits

Red TwizzlersSo Thursday could be a very big day. The Gentle Reader should stock up on popcornJujubesRaisinetsJunior Mints, or  Milk Duds. And if none of those work for you, we also have Red Twizzlers available via Amazon.

Stock up. Stay Tuned.

* * * * *

The possible big day on Thursday mentioned in the post referred to the final pretrial hearing in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance LOLsuit scheduled for the day after the post. The results of the hearing were mixed, but generally in the defendants favor. While we wound up having to go to trial, the court denied The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s motion for a preliminary injunction that would have shutdown our blogging about him.

Of course, by going to trial and losing, TDPK created the opportunity for even greater pointage, laughery, and mockification. Nothing proceeded as he had imagined.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Even Gentle Readers who have closely followed The Saga of Team Kimberlin for the past 8+ years sometimes lose track of all the various LOLsuits and other legal shenanigans that Brett Kimberlin has tired to employ in his failed attempts at brass knuckles reputation management. Five years ago today, I ran the following post to help the Gentle Readers keep track of Who’s On First?.

* * * * *

I’ve had several requests to explain the various court cases that are referenced here on Hogewash!, so here’s a more or less complete list of the current cases relating to Brett Kimberlin.

Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. was filed by The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin on 30 August, 2013, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County against Aaron Walker, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar, Kimberlin Unmasked, and me. It alleged all sorts of frivolous claims. The two persons TDPK claimed were Kimberlin Unmasked settled the case with him. Five of the seven claims against the rest of us were dismissed on summary judgment. We went to trial on his claims of defamation and false light invasion of privacy. After TDPK rested his case, the judge entered a directed verdict in the favor of the defendants because not a “scintilla” of evidence had been produced that we had defamed him or invaded his privacy. He has appealed the case to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals.

Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (I) was filed in U. S. District Court on 15 October, 2013, initially against 21 defendants, including me. It is also known around here as the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. The second amended complaint added three more defendants. Four of the defendants settled with TDPK. On 17 March, 2015, all but one claim against one defendant were dismissed. The federal claims were dismissed with prejudice, meaning that they cannot be refiled. The state law claims were dismissed without prejudice, meaning that could be refiled in state court. The case is still alive and is now called Kimberlin v. Frey. I often refer to it as the RICO Remnant. Kimberlin tried to appeal the dismissal of the federal claims to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. He appeal was dismissed.

TDPK did refile the state law claims from the RICO Madness in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. It’s formally known as Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club (II), but around here it’s called Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. RICO Retread—Most of the Universe because TDPK dropped several of the RICO Madness defendants.

The day before almost all of the RICO Madness case was dismissed, TDPK filed Kimberlin v. Hutton & Williams LLC, et al. which names me among the 19 defendants. I’ve taken to calling it Kimberlin v. Team Themis, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo.

Earlier this year, Kimberlin also filed a peace order petition against me. The petition was denied by the District Court. He appealed, and it was denied again by the Circuit Court. Acting through his wife, a criminal charge was filed for alleged online harassment of a minor child. The charges were dropped for lack of evidence. This was the second time he had tried to bring a false criminal charge against me. He filed a harassment charge in 2013 that was dismiss and expunged before I could even be served.

The serious pushback against Kimberlin’s lawfare is beginning. Aaron Walker as filed a suit know as Walker v. Brett Kimberlin, et al. The et al. is Tetyana Kimberlin. More consequences are in the pipeline.

* * * * *

I can sum up the results of Kimberlin’s lawfare by simply saying he’s maintained a perfect record—of striking out.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


It was six years ago today that someone sent me the first of several Hoge-Wan cartoons, and I shared it as a TKPOTD.

* * * * *

All_is_ProceedingStay tuned.

* * * * *

And less than two weeks later, The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin lost the first of four LOLsuits he filed against me.

Apparently, the Hoge-Wan cartoons really got under Kimberlin skin, because he brought them up when he called me as a witness in the Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. case in 2016.

Q Do you ever post graphics or photos of you as a Star Wars Hero?

A I have, people have sent me graphics of my face to replace, who’s the guy that played Obi-Wan Kenobi, the older fellow? This is what happens when you’re old. Alec, Sir Alec Guinness with my face instead of Alec Guinness’ as Obi-Wan in, in various cartoons. I think they’re funny, and I’ve, I’ve posted a few that have sent me, and other people have, have picked up on that, as well, and sort of run with it. It’s a, it’s, it’s kind of a running gag now in certain corners of the internet.

He actually thought that line of questioning related to Aaron Walker.