Prevarication Du Jour


David Edgren has a post over at the Artisan Craft Blog dealing with a recent blog post by the Cabin Boy™ which quotes Schmalfeldt as saying that the emails he sent back in 2015 which had a now-infamous picture of his late wife attached contained “instructions” that the picture not be published.

One of those emails was sent to the Carroll County Sheriff Jim DeWees and several of his deputies. I was cced. The email to Sheriff DeWees contains no instructions regarding publication of the picture. The Gentle Reader can read that email (with the images redacted) here. The other email was sent to a law enforcement agency in Massachusetts. I haven’t seen it, but I’d bet folding money that it also lacks any prohibition on publication of the image.

Of course, I have never put that image in a blog post here at Hogewash!—it’s not in the blog’s media files to be posted—and if I found it in a comment, I would immediately delete it.

UPDATE—This just appeared in my Twitter Notifications as part of what appears to be a Feldtdown.There are quite a few other possible explanations about how that picture of Mrs. Schmalfeldt made it into the wild on the Interwebz. One obvious possibility is that the Cabin Boy™ published it himself. I’m unaware of any evidence that would prove he did, but it’s still possible. Certainly, there is no evidence that Scott Hinckley or I ever published the photo.

Legal LULZ Du Jour


The Cabin Boy™ connected to Hogewash! at 12:20 ET this morning, and this string of tweets began at 12:24.He seems to be making safe predictions that I will be receiving legal paperwork (we are adverse parties in two lawsuits) and that the paperwork will be faulty (very likely if he is the source). Those tweets were his quick response to this morning’s TKPOTD. IIRC, the Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Billy Boy Unread article in question was published after the Cabin Boy™ was fired as editor in 2013, so it interesting that today’s TKPOTD would produce such a reaction. After all, Matt Osborne wrote the article, and The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin included it in his discovery.

BTW. if the Gentle Reader would like to know why the article is helpful to me, he can look here.

I published a blog post, and the Cabin Boy™ immediately reacted stupidly. Yep. Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The Cabin Boy™ is having a snit because someone called him a sociopath. He imagines that he has been defamed because he hasn’t been formally “diagnosed” as a sociopath.Where to begin? I suppose by pointing out the DSM (the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) is now up to revision 5, and DSM-5 contains no such diagnosis. The DSM-III was superseded in 1987. (I am not a shrink, but looking at the DSM-5 criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder and the Cabin Boy’s™ behavior, …)

So what does the word sociopath mean?

so·cio·path n. \ˈsō-sē-ə-ˌpath, ˈsō-sh(ē-)ə-\ 1. a person who is completely unable or unwilling to behave in a way that is acceptable to society. 2. a person with a psychopathic personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

Although I wouldn’t describe Bill Schmalfeldt as a sociopath, I can understand why someone else might. I prefer Ken White’s description for Schmalfeldt—”demented freak.”

UPDATE—After I originally drafted this post, the Cabin Boy™ put up another blog post demonstrating his poor understanding of both psychology and law. I’m not a professional in either of those disciplines, but I do know that the facts of the case he wants to rely on are inapposite to LOLsuit VIII, that the Texas case law Schmalfeldt cites is not binding on a court in South Carolina, and that the case law relating to defamation has evolved quite a bit over the past 40 years. For example, Brett Kimberlin lost his Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. LOLsuit because he could not prove that we defendants had made any false statements about him. We did not have to prove that we had told the truth. We had been truthful, but the burden of proof was on Kimberlin as a plaintiff rather than us as defendants.

Nothing is proceeding as the Cabin Boy™ has hallucinated.

Legal LULZ Du Jour


Hogewatch?

The hogewatch dot com domain hosted on the 198.15.113.115 server with jtmp dot org and other Team Kimberlin websites is empty. Maybe the Cabin Boy™ means the Hogewatch tab at Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Billy Boy Unread. Or maybe he’s referring to the now defunct (at)hogewatch Twitter account.

Whatever.

It would not be unreasonable for certain members of Team Kimberlin to be looking over their shoulders and wondering who’s next.

Logins


2017 JUL 23 04:16:24 UTC Home Page
2017 JUL 23 06:13:00 UTC tag=nuns
2017 JUL 23 06:14:10 UTC tag=mail-in-voting
2017 JUL 23 06:29:46 UTC 2016/04
2017 JUL 23 06:43:26 UTC tag=links
2017 JUL 23 06:45:38 UTC tag=parkinsons-dementia

UPDATE—2017 JUL 23 16:20:40 UTC Home Page
2017 JUL 23 20:45:51 UTC Home Page
2017 JUL 23 20:46:06 UTC search=spqr
2017 JUL 23 20:46:38 UTC 2016/08
2017 JUL 23 20:57:23 UTC tag=writing

Qapla’


Breaking: I am informed that a restraining order was granted in Palmer v. Schmalfeldt.

Stay tuned.

UPDATE—I’m informed that the Cabin Boy™ was present at the hearing.

More later.

UPDATE 2—Here is the Restraining Order:

UPDATE 3—Sarah Palmer talks about today’s events over at the Artisan Craft Blog.

The Cabin Boy’s™ Symptoms


Bill Schmalfeldt may have taken my suggestion that he thoroughly search this blog for references to him as a child pornographer or as someone faking Parkinson’s disease because he logged in to Hogewash! and conducted these searched this evening—

6:51:45 pm ET search=parkinson’s
6:56:27 pm ET search=child
6:58:39 pm ET search=pornography

So, how did that work out for him? I can’t say for sure, but at 7:08 pm this evening, I received a tweet from him with a dead link to one of his old websites and a copy of one of the pornographic images he created of me that was part of the evidence supporting Judge Stansfield’s finding that the Cabin Boy™ was likely to continue to harass me and that the first peace order should be extended.

The Gentle Reader should make up his own mind about what all that means.

UPDATE—So the Cabin Boy™ thinks I’ve lied?The Cabin Boy™ says I lied about his putting my face into pornographic images, specifically, an image involving anal intercourse. He may recognize the image on the left. It was stored on his Patriot-Ombudsman website as Screen-Shot-2013-03-24-at-5.07.52-PM_clipped_rev_1-2.33.37.png. (Since it was stolen from a video by Peter Ingemi, the Cabin Boy™ has no rights to the image.) It was this image that he photoshopped on the body of a man on the receiving in of anal sex. I have the original post as he published it in the vault, but I won’t post it here because I intend to keep my end of the 2014 Settlement Agreement. Also, this isn’t a porn site, so I do not choose to have such filth on this blog. However, if the Cabin Boy™ wants the image included in a court filing, I will do that if necessary. But he may want to remember Judge Kramer’s reaction to the other homoerotic image he posted with my face photoshopped in when it was entered into evidence in Schmalfeldt v. Hoge, et al.

Murum aries attigit.

UPDATE 2—The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt may also remember tweeting this just before he posted that homoerotic image—

UPDATE 3—I’ll take this tweet as permission to reproduce the Cabin Boy’s™ original blog post and/or the homoerotic image here at Hogewash!However, I stand by my decision not to reproduce Schmalfeldt’s filth on this blog. For now, the most I will do is show the small section of the original image at right. The area behind my face has been blurred to remove pornographic content.

If the Cabin Boy™ wants to press the issue in court, I’m willing to produce all the evidence I have.

UPDATE 4—I grabbed the tweet in UPDATE 3 out of my web browser immediately after seeing this tweet pop up in Tweet Deck—I normally save tweets as rendered by a browser because they tend to be more compact when included in a blog post. Note that the timestamp on the this tweet is 3:10 am, 9 July. My Tweet Deck program uses UTC which is +4 hours from ET. The tweet in UPDATE 3 is timestamped one minute later.

It appears that in the interval between when I noticed the new tweet in Tweet Deck and the time I opened my browser, the Cabin Boy™ deleted his original tweet and retweeted it without the words, “Post the image …”