Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Logins

2017 MAY 21 17:58:02 UTC tag/brett-kimberlin
2017 MAY 21 17:58:58 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 20:31:35 UTC tag/brett-kimberlin
2017 MAY 21 20:31:41 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:16:34 UTC tag/brett-kimberlin
2017 MAY 21 22:16:38 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:29:28 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:41:16 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:51:31 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:54:03 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 22:54:04 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 23:30:00 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 21 23:30:05 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 01:48:00 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 01:48:23 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 01:48:26 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 01:48:27 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 02:29:29 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 09:59:04 UTC Home Page
2017 MAY 22 10:56:28 UTC tag/brett-kimberlin
2017 MAY 22 11:26:13 UTC Home Page

Hmmmmm

Meanwhile, in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit—

T-minus 3 days and counting.

UPDATE—This may come as a shock to the Cabin Boy™, but the Team Kimberlin Post of the Day is not always about him. Hint: Those blog hits are from a Maryland IP address.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


One of the things we have been asking the courts to do is to enjoin Brett Kimberlin and Bill Schmalfeldt from filing any more pro se lawsuits without prior clearance by a judge. We haven’t been successful. Yet.

OTOH, the Cabin Boy™ has filed LOLsuit VIII: Avoiding Contact pro se in the U. S. District Court for the District of South Carolina—one of the few districts that require all pro se lawsuits to be reviewed by a Magistrate Judge before they are allowed to proceed and have summonses issued. I have a motion to dismiss on several grounds all tooled up ready to use, but I’ll hold on to it for now. The odds are that I won’t need it.

Meanwhile, in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit—

T-minus 5 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin managed to get some sort of memorandum filed before time ran out in the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit, and he actually wrote more than Judge Hazel asked for.

The memorandum was filed unde seal.

The ball is in Judge Hazels court now to deal with the pending motions for summary judgment.

Meanwhile, in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit—

T-minus 7 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s memorandum concerning Judge Hazel’s alternate potential reason for granting summary judgment in the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit is due today.

And in Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al.—

T-minus 8 days and counting.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


About two-and-a-half weeks ago, the Kimberlins filed this—

Last Friday, I filed this in reply to Tetyana Kimberlin’s opposition to my motion for summary judgment against her and in opposition to Brett Kimberlin’s motion for summary judgment.

The motions gibber or speak (in that order) for themselves, so I don’t plan to have any further substantive comment about this until the court has ruled on the motions.

T-minus zero.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s memorandum addressing Judge Hazel’s question concerning an additional reason to grant summary judgment in the Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit is due on the 18th.

T-minus 11 days and counting.

The Cabin Boy’s™ complete response to my request for production of documents in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit must be in my hands by close of business on the 15th.

T-minus 8 days and counting.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


A couple of weeks ago, Judge Hazel asked the parties in Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit to provide briefing relating to an alternate ground for granting summary judgment the case. Paterico’s lawyers filed their memorandum yesterday. It’s sealed just like everything else connected with the motions for summary judgment in that case.

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has until 18 May to file any response.

And in other Team Kimberlin legal news, The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt has a show cause hearing this afternoon in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit.

UPDATE—Corrected an error in the first paragraph. This filing relates to summary judgment rather than dismissal.