Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Brett Kimberlin’s campaign of brass knuckles reputation management began with a defamation lawsuit against a progressive blogger who wrote about the potential damage someone with Kimberlin’s reputation might have on the progressive cause. Pro free speech lawyers from all across the political spectrum provided support for that blogger, and Kimberlin made the mistake of trying to dox one to them. The resulting fallout from that doxing led to Everybody Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day and further legal wrangling.

Kimberlin didn’t have the good sense to cut his losses. He filed multiple defamation suits, and I was named as a defendant in four of them. One of my defenses was a claim that Kimberlin’s reputation was so bad because of his criminal record that he was defamation-proof, and I was not the only defendant to raise that claim. The TKPOTD from seven years ago today quoted from a motion to dismiss filed by other defendants.

* * * * *

RICOMadnessThe motion to dismiss filed by Michael Smith on behalf of Defendant Michelle Malkin and Non-Party Twitchy in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is a nice bit of legal writing. Here are a couple of excerpts.

In Cardillo v. Doubleday, Inc., 518 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1975), plaintiff sued for libel the authors and publisher of a book, My Life in the Mafia. Affirming the grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor, the Second Circuit recounted plaintiff’s extensive background of securities fraud, bail jumping, receiving stolen property, and other wrongdoing, and found as a matter of law that he was libel-proof, i.e. “so unlikely by virtue of his life as a habitual criminal to be able to recover anything other than nominal damages as to warrant dismissal of the case, involving as it does First Amendment considerations.” 518 F.3d at 639-640 (citations omitted). …

The libel-proof plaintiff doctrine warrants dismissal of the defamation count, since Mr. Kimberlin’s lengthy record renders him even less reputable than the plaintiffs in the above cases. As lengthy as Cardillo’s record was, he doesn’t appear ever to have conspired with intent to distribute 10,000 pounds of marijuana loaded onto a Colombian airplane, or illegally possessed and/or used the seal of the President of the United States or Department of Defense insignia, or impersonated a federal officer, or received explosives as a convicted felon. Kimberlin v. Dewalt, 12 F. Supp. 2d 487, 489-490 (D. Md. 1998). Cardillo was not a convicted perjurer. United States v. Kimberlin, 483 F. Supp. 350 (S.D. Ind. 1979). He never conducted a bombing spree in which an innocent couple leaving a high- school football game were permanently injured and maimed, and then, after one victim eventually committed suicide, sued the surviving widow. Kimberlin, 12 F. Supp. 2d at 490 (citation omitted). Simply put, even if Mr. Kimberlin’s complaint allegations were true, and even disregarding his failure to describe with particularity the defamatory statements he attributes to Mrs. Malkin, FAC [First Amended Complaint] ¶¶ 80-81, 99, nothing she (or any defendant) wrote could possibly lower his public standing further than the subterranean level to which his own depraved conduct has taken it.

Just so.

* * * * *

And eventually, one judge agreed. A court has now found that Kimberlin is defamation-proof.

3 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. Yo Hoggy, where’s Ali? Did he take up residence in the shithouse behind Robert Stacey’s abode?

      • Osborne’s squawking away, trying to make himself even close to relevant again. When you basically state that ‘the child porn wasn’t that bad’; you prove your point of view has no relevance at all.

Leave a Reply