Six years ago, my codefendants and I were in the midst of the first of Brett Kimberlin’s LOLsuits against us, the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance suit. Ali Alexander and Aaron Walker were both codefendants with me in two more cases (Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club et al . (I) RICO Madness and Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (II) RICO Retread). Stacy McCain and Kimberlin Unmasked were only included in the next one. I got a completely fresh set of codefendants for the Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit.
Discovery was due in that first case during May, 2014. Kimberlin’s responses to our interrogatories, requests for admissions, and requests for documents were generally unsatisfactory. The TKPOTD from six years ago today dealt with one of those inadequate responses.
* * * * *
The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin seems to believe that he’s a super special snowflake who shouldn’t have to answer those pesky and impertinent discovery interrogatories I’ve sent his way as part of discovery in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. This is from his motion for a protective order to allow him to dodge answering.Here’s paragraph 86—
Now, let me get this straight. TDPK is suing me for a million bucks, and information that would tend to either verify or refute his allegations is irrelevant to the case.
Stock market tip: Conagra owns the Orville Redenbacher’s brand.
* * * * *
Although Kimberlin probably still doesn’t understand the irony, his response to that interrogatory was truthful in one sense. Kimberlin lost his case because he never presented any evidence to the court that we had said or written anything false about him. Because there were no facts for the jury to try, the judge granted a judgment in our favor as a matter of law.. So, yes, the facts related to paragraph 86 of Kimberlin’s complaint were “irrelevant to [his] case.”