Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Yesterday’s TKPOTD looked back five years at The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt’s appeal of the extension of the first peace order issued against him. Today, we look back the following day’s TKPOTD.

* * * * *

It seems that the Cabin Boy™ is still getting his legal advice from Acme.@PatO201404292348ZWhere to begin? I guess I’ll just take it from the top.

1. Schmalfeldt did not file an “appeal brief;” all he filed was a Civil Appeal Information Report for the Court of Special Appeals. According to Md. Rule 3-803, one key item is missing from his petition. Since he’s pro se, the Court of Appeals may overlook the omission, but even if they do, he has raised no new legal arguments. Since he has given them no new reason to hear his appeal, I expect that they will deny his petition on the same grounds as they did last time.

2. Res judicata applies to the original peace order. That case is closed and not subject to relitigation. That matter is settled.

3. Schmalfeldt v. Hoge is on the Court’s Petition Docket. This only means is that the Clerk has received it and assigned it a tracking number. It does not mean that the judges have accepted the case for an appeal. If they do, it will be moved to the Regular Docket, and the case will proceed as the Court directs. In the unlikely event that the appeal is allowed, the next step is usually a round of briefing from the petitioner and respondent. We’ll see if it gets that far.

Stay tuned.

UPDATE—I’m told that the Cabin Boy™ is blabbering on teh Twitterz about how wrong I am.

Uh, huh

Like they say in the financial prospectuses, “past performance is not an indicator of future returns,” but it’s a safe way to bet. So consider how accurate Schmalfeldt’s predictions from 2013 of my crushing defeat in the appeal to the Circuit Court, my being clapped in irons (I found that one particularly amusing), or his quick victory in the Court of Appeals. You can believe Acme, or you can believe what real lawyers tell me. Either way, your belief will have no effect on what the Court does.

So chill.

And stay tuned.

* * * * *

Speaking of res judicata, The Hogewash Store has lots of mugs, t-shirts, and other tchotchkes available with the Res Judicata logo. There’s also junk branded Murum Aries Attigit, and Johnny Atsign. If you stop by, spend some money, and support this blog, I’ll be thankful.

2 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. There was one other fascinating, little data point that will be kept out of court – and I purposely saved this for last. That would be the details in negotiations between the Oberlin College and Gibson’s Bakery before their suit was filed in late 2017. Oberlin said it wanted to present as evidence the letters sent to the school to settle things up, and how much Gibson’s wanted from the school monetarily for such a settlement. Gibson’s objected to the negotiations being used as evidence. The judge agreed. “I am not going to permit any evidence of negotiation for a settlement,” he said, adding that “you can’t begin settlement [talks] without a demand.”

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/04/gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-trial-motions-judge-finds-gibsons-reputation-is-central-to-this-case/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s