Only the first of The
Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s LOLsuits against me made past a motion to dismiss. The trial in that suit was stopped by the judge when TDPK rested his case because Kimberlin had failed to show that any of the allegedly defamatory statements made by my codefendants and me were false. As the TKPOTD from four years ago today notes, Kimberlin focused his case on the fact that we had referred to him as a pedophile.
* * * * *
The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin doesn’t want to answer the interrogatories that I sent him as part of discovery in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance suit. For example—Irrelevant to the case? Really? I thought TDPK was suing me because he says I have called him a pedophile. This is from his complaint—
This is found on page 78 of Citizen K:
His [Kimberlin’s] attachment to Jessica was quite a different matter. Their weekly after-school outings, Kimberlin said, were “very special days” for her. … For three consecutive summers, 1974 through 1976, they took vacations for a week or longer in Disney World, Mexico, and Hawaii. Sandi [“Jessica’s” mother] couldn’t get time off from work, so on these summer trips it was just the two of them—Brett and Jessica.
Eyebrows levitated. A drug-dealing colleague had memories of conversations with Kimberlin that struck him as odd: “We’d see a girl who was pubescent or prepubescent, and Brett would get this smile and say, ‘Hey, what do you think? Isn’t she great?’ It made me very uncomfortable.” Another recalled Kimberlin introducing Jessica as “my girlfriend,” and if irony was intended, it was too subtile to register.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
* * * * *
The Gentle Reader may draw his own conclusions.