Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

One of the claims that The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin made in his Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (I) RICO Madness LOLsuit was that writing truthfully about him created “false narratives” which caused harm to his “relationship as an educator” with the State Department. The TKPOTD from four years ago today had some details about that claim.

* * * * *

The following is from The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s proposed Second Amended Complaint in his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. ECF 100-1-152He goes on to complain that he lost his contract when the State Department became aware that his background was becoming publicly known.

Well, let’s think about the situation from the State Department’s point of view. Would they want the governments of those countries to be able to claim that our government was bringing “activist” to the U. S. for training by the Speedway Bomber?

Bad optics.

* * * * *

The Gentle Reader should not be surprised to learn that I investigated TDPK’s claim. My investigation included a Freedom of Information Act request to the State Department concerning in contracts awarded to Kimberlin or his not-for-profits.

The most charitable interpretation of the response to my FIOA request was that the State Department doesn’t want to admit to having had anything to do with Brett Kimberlin. My interpretation is that Kimberlin was lying in his complaint. The Gentle Reader may make up his own mind.

4 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. Where does Brett Kimberlin get his money? What is it he does? Who are Brett Kimberlins’ associates? Other than Neal and DumbF5ck? Beyond self-enrichment, what is his goal? Has Brett Kimberlin paid appropriate taxes over the years? Does his lifestyle, and expenses, match what he’s declared to the IRS? Are Brett Kimberlins’ non-profit orgs square with the law? Are they square with gov’t reporting requirements? You’re a Democrat, right, Brett? You’re therefore good with ‘more government’ rather than ‘less’- Right?

    All of that is IMHO. Speculation. And wonderment (as in, “I wonder-“). Don’t sue me Brett.

  2. “…teach activists from around the world how to use social media and the art to effectuate change in their respective countries.”

    Is bombing an art?

  3. “The most charitable interpretation of the response to my FIOA request was that the State Department doesn’t want to admit to having had anything to do with Brett Kimberlin.”

    That would imply there’s someone in government that thinks Brett Kimberlin is important enough to lie about.

    While my trust in general for bureaucrats is tenuous at best, it’s doubtful that those responding to that FOIA request were convicted perjurers, like our good friend Brett Kimberlin.

    Personally, I don’t think the art of effectuating change via social media really needs to include Tovex.

    Just sayin’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s