Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Team Kimberlin lost control of the narrative long ago, and nothing they have tried has enabled them to regain an ability to effectively peddle their false stories. Indeed, their web presence is now a joke. They can’t even generate comment on their web sites.

This is from jtmp dot org, the Justice Through Music Project site—None of the featured posts have generated a comment. The same is true of the Velvet Revolution.US site—And the Cabin Boy™ has managed to drive the credibility of Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Billy Boy Unread even lower that the dismal level achieved under Matt Osborne—No comments. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Bupkis.

The Cabin Boy™ may believe that he can now post anything he pleases without consequence because with no one reading his stuff there will be no one to hold him accountable. That may not be a safe bet.

21 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. You settled the first one, DUMBF*CK. I’d tell you to stop lying, but I’m convinced you’re not capable of that.

    • The Lyin’ of Lebanon, doing what he does best. Just like his excellent friend, they both lie when it’s so easy to prove they’re lying.

    • Dearest Bill,
      Please explain why your own court appointed attorney dismissed your case. What technicality forced that decision? Generally JUDGES will dismiss based on a technicality. Maybe your lawyer was making really stupid mistakes. Are you saying your lawyer was incompetent?
      Wait, the lawyer didn’t file something that was tossed, HE dismissed it. Was he that incompetent Bill? Pray tell why would your own lawyer dismiss a case on a technicality? That is……QUEER.

      • Yeah, lawyers don’t dismiss cases that they are assigned based on a technicality. They dismiss them because they are going to LOSE, LOSE, LOSE from the get-go. And he doesn’t want to risk *his* license bringing a frivolous complaint to the court. Tells you a whole awful lot, doesn’t it? lol

        • Lawyers Can’t dismiss appointed cases unless there are serious illlegalities, such as child pornographers peddling butthurt, or for pure harassment or other malicious intent. I’m sure someone reached out to them or on their own saw the volumes of filth, risked sanctions from a federal judge, who then agreed to end the representation and probably warned him to drop the suit or face imprisonment.

    • Settled the first, dismissed another, everything else dismissed because he is incompetent at crafting something that has an actual chance of beating jurisdiction. if he manages to beat jurisdiction (OH, MY SIDES!) there are ever so other many bars he has to make it over. And frankly, he doesn’t have what it takes.

      Story of his life.

  2. A lawsuit dismissed with prejudice is considered to be a lawsuit decided on the merits. So Bill Schmalfeldt’s lawsuit against myself and several others was NOT dismissed on technicalities – it was dismissed with prejudice. So he lost that lawsuit, no matter what lies he tells.

    • Is that the lawsuit where Bill was suing Roy because Roy called him a rappist? So if I understand you correctly then by dismissing with prejudice Bill ADMITTED the rape accusation was true.

  3. From Media Bias / Fact Check http://bit.ly/2ycLR8p
    “Articles and headlines contain numerous loaded emotional words that favor the left and criticize the right. Breitbart Unmasked typically takes quotes from other left biased articles and then applies commentary to it.”

    ”Supplementary material should read as, “Breitbart Unmasked biases stem from it being overtly malevolent, racist, anti-Semitic, etc., which frequently plagiarizes other far-left sites to to disseminate propaganda of convicted serial bomber Brett Kimberlin. The extreme radical left publication is widely known for putting out malicious, defamatory hit pieces on those who would expose the stupidity, crimes and evil nature of Brett Kimberlin. Disagreeable comments are not allowed. Only comments that are favorable to Brett Kimberlin and Kimberlin associates and agree with Breitbart content are allowed. If disagreeable comments are allowed through, the editorial staff at Breitbart Unmasked are known to publish IP address and email address to threaten and intimidate current and potential commenters with opposing views not to post at Bretibart Unmasked.Bill Schmalfledt has a proven history plagiarism and is guilty of altering the commenters name and content to malign enemies of Brett Kimberlin in order to threaten, discredit or cause them harm. “

    So yes, there is a high probability that serious consequences are headed Bill Schmalfeldt’s way. Not to mention, websites that specifically focus on media bias are illustrating t, but may also prove to be a valuable resource documenting the extreme one-sided radical bigotry at Breitbart Unmasked along with Bill Schmalfeldt’s more than obvious forgery and plagiarism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s