Here’s some more pointage, laughery, and mockification of The Dread Deadbeat Pro-Se Kimberlin’s informal opening brief in his appeal of the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit.
<plm>Let’s fisk his penultimate paragraph—
This case is important, not only because it involves allegations about a corrupt prosecutor who uses the power of his office to target his enemies, but also because Frey is a member of the “alt-right” and confidant of Andrew Breitbart and Steve Bannon, the latter who served in the Trump White House before being recently ousted fro his extremist conduct.
OK, a case about a corrupt prosecutor could be important. However, Judge Hazel examined the uncontested evidence (as opposed to TDPK’s spin on the meaning of that evidence) and found that Patrick Frey acted within his rights as a crime victim when he sought to have Kimberlin investigated in connection with that crime. It isn’t corrupt for a crime victim to complain to the authorities, even if he’s one of the authorities himself.
However, TDPK does nothing to demonstrate that Patterico is a member of the “alt-right” or why that would have any significance in the case. Similarly, Kimberlin has never shown that any connection between Andrew Breitbart and/or Steve Bannon on the one hand and Patrick Frey on the other increases the “importance” of his LOLsuit.
The exhibits attached to the summary judgment motions filed in the lower court, which include dozens of Breitbart emails to and from Frey, provide a very important template of how the alt-right smears people with false narratives that they amplify through their networks. It is important for the public to know that Breitbart even employs law enforcement officials such as Frey who will use the power of their office to destroy its enemies.
What’s truly important about the past five or so years of lawfare is not any imaginary alt-right smearing of Brett Kimberlin. In fact, as far as I know, neither Patrick Frey nor any other of my codefendants in the various TDPK’s LOLsuits (nor I) are aligned with the so-called alt-right. Moreover, I’d be wiling to bet folding money that, to the extent any members of the alt-right are aware of Brett Kimberlin, they regarded him as a failed leftwing scam artist.
Setting aside the lack of agreement between the pronouns and antecedent nouns in the last sentence, its underlying message seems to be a cri du coeur of frustration that Kimberlin’s use of false narratives has failed to smear his enemies. (I’ve been the victim of four such attempts, two sets of false criminal charges and a bogus peace order petition.) Kimberlin has tried to project his template on to us, but Patrick Frey, my other codefendants, and I have been successful in defending ourselves by simply telling the truth.</plm>
In the end, the Kimberlin v. Frey case is important, but not for the reasons TDPK suggests. It’s important because shutting down Kimberlin’s use of lawfare to unconstitutionally muzzle people who talk about him reinforces the protection of everyone’s First Amendment rights.
He was certainly friends with Andrew Breitbart, but he’s written about Steve Bannon, and he is most certainly not friends with him.
Yet another example of Kimberlin mixing only minimal truth with his blatant lies.
http://kimberlinunmask.com/files/adventures101.jpg
The ravings of a criminal lunatic.
Is it just me, or is he sounding even more desperate than usual?
Meanwhile in the Roach
MotelCondo, the Inflate-A-Boy is having a stompy footed meltdown because the “RESISTANCE” won’t follow his orders. Seems he’s a bit peeved that people are posting screenshots of guys in the resistance being creepy to the woman. I wonder why Inflate-A-Boy would defend creepy men. It’s almost like having a roof over his head depended on turning a blind eye to rapists, child molesters, creepy dudes with multiple restraining orders, etc. Queer innit?Rapists?
Child molesters?
Creepy dudes with multiple restraining orders?
How many people are we talking about here?
Just downtwinkle this comment if it’s more than one.
It can’t be considered important that he was a member of a particular group even if he were such a member. Even NAZIs, people in the KKK, or anarchists would be within their rights to want a crime committed against them investigated, to have crimes against them investigated, and for the offenders to be punished by the law if caught.
Manafort indictment: https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download
Nothing about Trump, collusion with Russia, etc., and a lot about tax evasion, failure to register as a foreign agent for Ukraine, money laundering and lying to the feds.
Ukraine…..
Hmm. Doesn’t a member of Team K have dealings with Ukraine?
Besides mail order brides?
All crimes supposedly committed while working for Hillary’s close friend, the Podesta brothers. lol
“…failed leftwing scam artist.” That’s high praise in leftwing gibberish. How about serial bomber or creepy songwriter or habitual litigant? The list goes on.
Pingback: In The Mailbox: 10.30.17 : The Other McCain
I’m alt-right and a confidant of Steve Bannon’s? LOL. That must be why Bannon told people to tell me to go f**k myself (after I called out Breitbart.com for surreptitiously correcting a mistake without acknowledging error). And why I write screeds against the alt-right on a regular basis. This guy will say literally anything.
Kimberlin is a nut as well as a fraudster. He always has been. Since childhood he’s been trying to pave over his worthlessness with fantasies and importance-by-association.
His biggest con is trying to get people to think he is something other than the pathetic little man he has been all his life.