The Kimberlins filed this in response to one of the paragraphs in the Scheduling Order for the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit—
The Gentle Reader may notice a discrepancy between the Certificate of Service and the postmark on the envelope I received containing service of my copy.
The list of objections to exhibits referenced in paragraph 1 was missing from my copy of the filing. I wouldn’t have been surprised to find that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin had purposely failed to include the attachment in my copy, but checking the docket at the Clerk’s Office showed that he didn’t send it to the court either—so I can’t complaint about incomplete service.
The Scheduling Order required that the addresses of all witnesses be listed. Also, I know that several of the witnesses won’t appear unless they are subpoenaed. According to the docket, the only subpoenas that have been issued are mine.
Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.