The Gentle Reader should note that the Cabin Boy™ does not provide a citation for his “Federal decision.” IANAL, but I believe the reason that he can’t is because the controlling federal case law doesn’t support his theory.
The controlling Supreme Court decisions are Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) and Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003). Every blog post published here is well within the First Amendment protections outlined by those cases. It may be that some commenter has wandered outside of those limits. If he did, he alone is responsible under the provisions of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. § 230). The Supreme Court has never weighed in on that law, but the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has. (Maryland and South Carolina are both in the Fourth Circuit.) The controlling opinion is Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), and it upheld the safe harbor provisions of the law.
Here, Congress decided that free speech on the Internet and self-regulation of offensive speech were so important that § 230 should be given immediate, comprehensive effect.
Id. at 335.
The facts and the law are both against The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt in LOLsuit VIII: Avoiding Contact. He can pound on his keyboard all he wants, but the only result will be more pointage, laughery, and mockification.
Nothing is proceeding as the Cabin Boy™ has hallucinated.