Prevarication Du Jour

For the record, Aaron Walker has only represented me in court in The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s appeal of the RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. Aaron won that appeal for me and also an award of sanctions against Kimberlin for filing his frivolous appeal against me.

Aaron is not a member of the state bar in South Carolina or the bar of the U. S. District Court down there. Any counsel I have engaged or might engage already is a member of the bar of that District Court.

Aaron has never written any court paper for me that he did not sign as my counsel. Any statement to the contrary is false, has no evidentiary basis, and might be the basis of a counterclaim in LOLsuit VIII: Avoiding Contact.

Nothing is proceeding as the Cabin Boy™ has hallucinated.

85 thoughts on “Prevarication Du Jour


      I swear, the @ sign just fills itself out. All the time. And in (semi)correct grammatical locations.

    • Witness to what? Dumbfuck’s campaign of harassment against Hoge? Dumbfuck’s clumsy attempt to entrap Aaron?

  1. The man is more than obsessed with you. Mainly because you thwart him at every turn. Between you and Krendler, I would daresay 90% of his daily thoughts are consumed on HOW TO GET THEM!!!11!!1!

    • I would say “poor Inflataskank!” except she probably thinks that being allowed to join in his craziness is an expression of affection.

      • I wonder how many times he’s accidentally called her “Hoooooooooooooooooooooge!” while they were..

        Wait.. scratch that. I denounce myself in the strongest possible terms.

          • Well, father, forgetting may be the Christian ideal, but I greatly doubt that most mortals are capable of it in regard to severe wrongs. Worldly prudence strongly suggests remembering and learning from experience. In any case, as a devout pagan, I can admit that forgiving is a virtue under many circumstances, a point on which we at least partially agree, even though we disagree on the virtue of amnesia.

            I am fully aware that Christian theology does not even hold out hope that mortals can choose to lead a moral life, at least absent the flukiness of divine grace, but does hold that even sinners may receive divine forgiveness. A morality that is outside human capacity leaves me cold.

  2. Under the Schmaledt Twitter Legal Rules, isn’t claiming someone else wrote your filings and you signed them, being false and he has to know that, immediately “libel per se”?

    • Well I can pretty much tell when what’s-his-dent has written docs himself, copy and pasted, or relied on Bomby McShrimpington for legal counsel. His bad forging hints at a genuine inability to ape anything effectively but dance steps. Seems like a blind spot.

  3. Wait…are you suggesting that you may engage (or may already have engaged) a for-real, not disgraced, not humiliated, not unemployed, member in good standing of the South Carolina bar to oppose the Dreadful Pro Se Schmalfeldt?

    Shit, I guess I’ll post the new pool in the break room on Wednesday:


    It will be posted right next to the WHO’S KRENDLER? schedule. Reminder – ltl is next up, starting Saturday.

    Looking forward to a vacation.

      • Counterclaims would prevent Drunkenstein from doing that.

        It’s a wonderful world, isn’t it?

      • dont forget to put up the “give me info and I’ll cut you loose” pool.
        that usually happens shortly after threatening everyone with summonses.

        • Please clarify: is this pool a “when does he make the offer?” or “who takes the offer?”

          Because only the first one guarantees a payoff.

          • The second one always ends up as “no one”, so that pool was not opened this time.

    • Let’s see…
      “Hey, Popehat, do you know any South Carolina attorneys?”
      “Hey, Patterico, do you know any South Carolina attorneys?”
      “Hey, Other McCain, do you know any South Carolina attorneys?”
      “Hey, Ace, do you know any South Carolina attorneys?”
      “Hey, Twitchy, do you know any South Carolina attorneys?”

      I mean, if there aren’t any attorneys here who already knew some.

  4. Here’s a question Bill cannot, nor does he have the courage or intellectual honesty to answer.

    Why is it, after all your bloviating about your case and the applicable law, that you need help

    • what legal, legit reason would Dumbf5ck need to subpoena anything from WordPress??
      its not like he’s suing any John/Jane Doe’s in his currant Lulzsuit.
      and its not like he doesn’t already claim to know who/where the current defendants are.

      and he doesnt get another freebie amendment, no matter how retarded disabled he is.

      lying liars gotta lie
      Dumbf5cks gotta Dumbf5ck
      and losers are gonna lose.
      Shakey is the trifecta.

    • Since I’m in my last eight weeks of my third BA (so I can start my third Masters in September), I’m not F5ing the way a certain resident of SC does. What “advice” did John give him, other than a warning that he might be facing a real lawyer rather than a pro se?

      • Just the simple what everyone should know advice; that he has to send the defendants whatever he files with the court.

  5. I can see why Oliver Wendell Jones would believe that. John hasn’t misspelled “Hoge” in three different cases, so of course somebody else is writing the briefs.

    And isn’t South Carolina in the Fourth Circuit?

  6. Since there won’t be any witnesses, or any subpoenas for that matter, this was especially LULZy. As for not thinking about Hoge much, I think it’s more than evident Blob’s every waking moment is consumed with Hoge,
    how to “get Hoge”, how to silence the Lickspittles, how to get a case past dismissals due to dumbf*ckery, and generally anything Hoge related.

    I’m still laughing at the regular ramp-up of PD symptoms before every court appearance, the mandatory “they are trying to worsen my disability” rants prior to every court decision, and the frequent mention of Blob’s disability and frailness in every communication he sends to the court. Blob has shown amazing healing powers between court battles, has he not?

    His Twitter pal Willy the Cat Lady often refers to the Lickspittle as obsessed. When one is so mentally challenged, I can see how his limited capacity confuses mocking and sport with a life that has no other meaning. I do miss the days of Blob’s declarations to walk away from Twitter to live out his last days peacefully. The many failed radio excursions have left a trail ripe with failure and disappointment. What a legacy, Blob. What a legacy.

    • From what I heard, he showed amazing healing powers *during* court hearings. Wherever he says the word “parkinson’s” he suddenly goes from full throated bellow to croaking and week.

  7. Where is the cockroach? I was expecting to see a cartoon of the cowardly lion questioning AW in court, because that would be so funny, and against the coward’s best interests.

  8. Pretty bold horse manure from Cabin Boy, given that he has been caught him with perjurous certs that suggest The Dread Pedo is writing his pleadings.

  9. Bill, you are indigent and practically homeless. There is no earthly way to cast you in a more negative light than you already are, from your own actions.

    “Judgment proof”? Maybe. But by those same actions you have also become “libel proof”.

    Live with it.

    • I love how he’s dropped half the ACTUAL components of libel from his standard. If any case of his reaches that far, he’ll learn the court’s haven’t.

    • Of course his suit is never going to get this far, but imagine if he manages to surmount the procedural hurdles that he has never surmounted before, and to prevent himself as being riled a public person, at least for a limited purpose, and to prove that he was not evicted from any residence he ever inhabited (“evicted” in any sense of the word such as not having his lease renewed). He would then have to prove actual damages. No job, no audience, no fame, no anything. As you say, someone who must file as a pauper is pretty much sure to be defamation proof.

        • Depends on which Twitter court.

          Different circuits have different precedents, rules of procedure, and rules of evidence. Indeed they even have different crimes and different courts.

          Gotta be careful about Twitter court.

  10. This can be garnished

    presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,–
    (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;
    (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;
    (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
    (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

    • He just doesn’t know the power of the Dark Side.

      (Select your favorite: the original Imperial March, the Rage Remix from the Force Commander game, or Celldweller’s techno-themed remix)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s