Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

The Gentle Reader will likely remember that I usually tag posts about motions or oppositions or replies with a line about not saying anything substantive until after the court has ruled. This arrived in the mail on Saturday, …

… and since Judge Hecker denied the Kimberlin’s underlying motion last week, I’m gonna comment.

First of all: Bwahahahahahahahaha!

Now, let’s go through this filing paragraph by paragraph.

1. While I did argue that moving the case with discovery coming to a close would be a bad idea and disruptive, the reason that is so has nothing to do with the Kimberlins’ foot dragging per se. Rather the time to make such a move is in the earliest days of a case. It’s too late now. Notice that they expect more motions to compel, a tacit admission that they have been playing games with discovery.

2. It’s nice of them to admit that they were blowing smoke about calling Assistant State’s Attorney Grote and Judge Stansfield as witnesses.

3. While the Cabin Boy™ has been able to attend hearings via Skype, I have been advised that there is no provision in the Rules to allow for a remote appearance of a party during a trial unless he is represented by counsel who is present in the courtroom. Either he or his lawyer must stand before the judge during the trial. I haven’t heard anything about Schmalfeldt hiring a lawyer.

4. The Walker v. Kimberlin case has a final judgment at the Circuit Court level, and the case docket is at the Court of Special Appeals in Annapolis.

5. There are plenty of judges on the Circuit Court who are aware of what’s been going on with respect to Brett Kimberlin’s lawsuits against me. I’ll bet The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin is glad that Judge Eric Johnson has retiredt. Also, he probably doesn’t want to face Judges Mason, Rupp, Rubin, Ryon, or McGann again.

6. There are more than three defendants left.

7. Oh, poor babies. At least there’s plenty of free parking near the Carroll County Circuit Courthouse. I’ve probably spent several hundred bucks just on parking near the Rockville courthouses since 2013 when TDPK started filing bogus criminal charges, lawsuits, and a peace order against me. Don’t get me started on billable hours lost.

8. They’re lying.

9. They’re lying, and no one has believed Kimberlin since Judge Johnson ruled in 2012 that no assault occurred.

10. They’re lying.

11. If someone has been stalking or harassing the Kimberlins, I hope the cops catch whoever is doing it. However, I’ll bet it’s the same imaginary criminal who vandalized the Cabin Boy’s™ tires.

12. Uh, huh. Could it be that TDPK sees extra security not because Aaron Walker is in the courthouse but because the Speedway Bomber is there?

13. Oh, their concern trolling about my witness list is sooooo special. If they’d like something to keep themselves awake at night, the Kimberlins should ponder what I’ve been pondering over who saw what when. They might be shocked to learn what witnesses I’ve uncovered. They could have asked me in discovery.

Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

45 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. On a related note, Brett Coleman Kimberlin is still a lying sack of shit.

    But that’s none of my business…

  2. Para. 8… our gracious host obviously stalked the Kimberlins by having the sheer audacity! to remain in an unexploded condition. QED.

  3. Are you sure the Cabin Boy™ didn’t hire Harvey Firestone Birdman, Attorney-at-Law? I read somewhere that a combination retainer and tire change fee of some $684.00 was paid.

  4. Paragraph 5 is missing a word. BK forgot to tell us what item of his you were supposedly serially harassing.

    Or else he’s just proving that he’s almost as bad a writer as Bill Schmalfeldt.

    And he obviously didn’t get Biwwy’s memo about the planned whirlwind 48 state “I’m too ill to make it to a court hearing, but i can drive 14000 miles in 5 weeks” road trip.

    • Y’know, I think there might also be a “Chance” or “Community Chest” card in that game that reads “Go to Jail. Go directly to Jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect $200.”

      Sadly, there’s also a “get out of jail free” card.

  5. What a coincidence that the pedo brings up Mr. Fakinsons’/legal issues in Maryland right before a trial where Mr. Fakinsons will be forced to be present.

    Boy that bus he will he thrown under is coming up fast and he’s too stupid to see that the pedo is the one throwing him under.

    • Bill is so desperate for ANYONE to like and/or talk to him that he will do anything. Hence his years long harassment of Hoge at the tiny Pedos behest.

      • Witnesses are not allowed to watch the trial until their testimony is complete and they will not be recalled to the stand. The first day of the trial is all procedural. They don’t have to be there, and their attendance can be scheduled. Brett can stuff it. He drug them into this. He can deal with the consequences.

  6. The certificate of service is…dumb. He’s lashing out randomly, which can’t be a healthy sign.
    Given that he’s including more proven lies, is there an avenue to point that out or is there no upside anyway?

  7. Pingback: Team Knucklehead Forged Document of the Day | Dave Alexander & Company with David Edgren and Gus Bailey – The Artisan Craft Blog

    • Gee, it’s a good thing he just got new tires. Those old ones never would have made the trip. That ‘vandalism’ was so damn convenient.

    • Where I live most insurance has a $100 or $250 deductible against vandalism. Wanna bet the police report was so he could file a claim? Cheaper tires that way and he gets to play the HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGE!!! card at the same time.

      His pedo master would be proud if this was the case.

      • How many tires were purportedly vandalized and how many were replaced?

        What was the fair market value of even the best of them?

        Do insurance companies investigate all claims or only those over a certain threshold?

  8. I would be hysterical too if my perverted Ukraine child bride seeking Dad was asking me awful and nasty questions on the stand.

      • This sentence has severe problems with ambiguous referents: who is being referred to as “her” in this hypothetical about “my” mother? Is there any reliable evidence, or even gossip, that someone had pre-marital or post-marital sex with his mother-in-law when she was quite young?

        I am either out of the loop (again) or being a grammar Nazi (again).

        • The “her” refers to Redacted Kimberlin, daughter of the defendants.

          I’m sure others here are more thoroughly conversant with what’s been put forth over the years, but IIRC there was at least one document indicating the physical relationship began before the mother reached the age of consent.

          • Far from clear. It might have been referring to the perverted child bride. So far at least in these cases, I have seen no reference to perverted child brides, whether or not they had mislaid their fathers in the Ukraine or elsewhere, but, as I said, I may have been out of the loop and missed any number of interesting developments.

          • Jeff –

            You may just be poking fun at a poorly-worded (albeit accurate) statement… but in case you are truly confused, the following may help clear things up for you:

            “perverted Ukraine child bride seeking Dad”

            This is a reference to Tetyana Kimberlin’s (allegedly) estranged husband (the domestic terrorist Brett “The Speedway Bomber” Kimberlin) – the person Tetyana Kimberlin’s eldest daughter KK refers to as “Dad.”

            A “man” (DAD) who was in his forties at the time he was apparently SEEKING out young girls, met Tetyana Kimberlin in the UKRAINE, and brought her back to the United States where via forged documents he was able to make her his CHILD BRIDE – hence, PERVERTED.

            The information posted above was shared by Tetyana Kimberlin herself when she was attempting to acquire a Peace Order against her (allegedly) estranged husband Brett “The Speedway Bomber” Kimberlin because she feared for her safety, and the safety of her two daughters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s