Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

This appeared on the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. docket yesterday—398855v-di71_1Hmmmm. Is this an answer to the Complaint? Just last Monday, the Cabin Boy™ was saying that he believed that his two pending motions to dismiss had stopped the clock on his having to file an answer. It will be interesting to read this once I get served with a copy.

Curiouser and curiouser.

27 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

    • I thought the babbling buffoon was having the case moved to WI, you know, because of its magic button, or its dementia, or something. hahahahaha

  1. Wait, are you saying that after the clock resumes counting down after a denied motion to dismiss, that subsequent MTDs don’t stop the clock again?

    That’s just crazy talk. I mean, if that were the case, why, then BS would be completely off his Acme Legal rocker. And we know that couldn’t possibly be true. He’s said so over and over again.

  2. I’m going to go out on a limb here, and say that the Answer will be an incoherent mess that never addresses what the complaint puts at issue.

    Bold prediction, I know.

      • That would actually be a good thing for Bill, since he nearly always in his motions admits to stuff against his own interests. He trumps the definition of dumb!

        • There is a large chance that in the midst of his Answer that he basically admits the key allegations and sets himself up for summary judgment.

          • More specifically, he’ll admit that he did it all, and then explain at excruciating length about how Hoge was asking for it. Also, cuts will be mentioned.

          • i know a guy who screamed at being called a child pornographer, that their stuff was just cutting edge comedy, but then helpfully provided the pornographic text.

            good times, good times

          • The one case where this guy put the actual text to his “edgy comedy” into the filing as attachments was helpful. Nauseating, but helpful.

            But wasn’t there a state case a couple years back where the same guy didn’t include the helpful “transcript” but he did write, in loving detail, exactly what was being described and why it wasn’t* porn by Maryland law. That was one of the funniest things that man has ever written.

            * for a given value of “wasn’t.”

  3. IANAL but, doesn’t there have to be a question for there to be an answer? I think everyone knows The Johnnie Walker Red Baron’s average is Oh-for-this-century, so any Question or Answer is self-evident and well established.

  4. I’ll be polite, and perhaps state the obvious. it confused me at first as well, because why would 4 be ‘answering’ there. Then I realized that it was just misfiled and should be item 70/2.

    That noted, the date of item 71/0 was intriguing…

    • Fear pee running down his leg is a daily occurrence.

      Fear pee dribbling down the scooter (it’s red, vroom, VROOM) is a biweekly occurrence.

  5. Well, it’s a refreshing change from The Sawed-Off Pedo Bomber’s document titles, which usually include scurrilous and slanderous insults…

Leave a Reply