Logins

2016 AUG 20 01:29:43 UTC Home Page
2016 AUG 20 01:30:03 UTC 2013/02
2016 AUG 20 01:44:43 UTC Home Page
2016 AUG 20 01:45:05 UTC 2013/02
2016 AUG 20 01:48:35 UTC 2013/03

UPDATE—2016 AUG 20 04:09:47 UTC Home Page
2016 AUG 20 04:16:59 UTC Home Page

UPDATE 2—2016 AUG 20 15:32:59 UTC Home Page

UPDATE 3—2016 AuG 20 21:13:24 UTC Home Page

UPDATE 4—2016 AUG 20 23:35:30 UTC Home Page

21 thoughts on “Logins


  1. World Stupidest Client Just IN BAD FAITH published inside correspondence between himself and they guy he defamed.

    SO BE SURE TO STOP WRITING ABOUT ALL YOUR COURT CASES

    DON’T FORGET YOUR CRIMINAL TRIAL IN MARYLAND WHERE THE JUDGE FOUND YOU GUILTY BUT LET YOU OFF BECUASE OF YOUR IMAGINARY ROLODEX


    • CALL YOUR LAWYER

      BE SURE TO TELL HIM THREE TIMES YOU HAVE SAID “LET THE PROFESSIONALS HANDLE IT” AND THEN YOU WROTE I RAPED MY DAUGHTERS, CONFESSED THREE TIMES TO HARASSING SARAH, AND ADMITTING TO FELONY LEVEL SPOLIATION.

      GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.


      • Aren’t there laws about photoshopping members of the military onto degrading photos? Someone just asked me that recently.


        • I know that it is prosecuted relentlessly when the right circumstances occur and is taken to the proper authorities.


          • Well, the person is question has had her face photo shopped before and the army flew her out of her forward base in Afghanistan twice to testify in the trial and I just received word that his final appeal was denied.

            Then there was the I rape my daughter article….

            Not going to be able to explain that to a jury or a judge or a free lawyer


          • Now, now, BPO, to be fair he will be able to come up with an explanation, it’s just that no one will consider accepting it for even a femtosecond.

            His poor lawyer. /smh


  2. I hope he arrives at that meeting fully prepared to explain why he scrubbed his twitter and blogs right after getting his IFP and pro bono lawyer.

    I’m sure that Mr. Sorich will explain to him in no uncertain terms that spoliation is an issue for plaintiffs as well as defendants, especially since plaintiffs usually know about pending (or impending) litigation long before the defendants do, and defendants can (and do, all the time) use plaintiffs’ documents as part of their defense.

    I hope he can explain to his lawyer how is he not a public figure, or at least a limited public figure having
    a) been an XM Sirius radio host for over 2 years,
    b) having been a radio host in other markets for what, 10 years?
    c) having produced numerous NIH podcasts during his time there, most of which are still available on their website
    d) having written for Liberaland for several months
    e) having numerous books and cds/mp3s available on Amazon
    f) having run for public office

    I hope he can explain to his lawyer why it wasn’t his fault that he violated the Peace Order so egregiously that the State of Maryland charged him with nearly 400 violations.

    I hope he can explain to his lawyer why it’s not a copyright violation to use anything found online even if it has a copyright notice, because if it’s on the web, it’s really public domain, right?

    I hope he can convince his former State’s Attorney lawyer that mutliple judges in multiple jurisdictions were all wrong when they thought he deserved having peace/restraining orders granted against him, including Cook County, in who’s SA’s office Mr. Sorich used to work.

    I doubt that all the hunting through Mr. Hoge’s blog in the world will help with any of those issues.


  3. It strikes me as…. queer….. that for a man, and I use that term loosely here, who swears he has every word he’s ever written that Bill must depend on Team Free Speech websites to go back and harvest his Internet postings. You would think he’d be embarrassed and humiliated, but no, it’s just another day to one so used to being embarrassed and humiliated.


  4. It seems to me that he should be more concerned with presenting actual evidence of torts that are (a) actually torts (b) not covered by res judicata or collateral estoppel and (c) can be proven to be committed by the person he claims did it.

    That right there is quite a mountain to climb.


  5. Getting let go at Breitbartunamsked is like getting kicked of out the Kennedys for being a womanizer


  6. Can we get a DOOM!!11eleventy!1!! clock out of all this? I think Bill doesn’t care any longer. *sniff*
    Asking for a friend

Leave a Reply