Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Last Friday, the Court of Appeals (Maryland’s highest court) denied The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s petition for a writ of certiorari seeking an appeal of the affirmation by the Court of Special Appeals of the findings by the Montgomery County Circuit Court in favor of Aaron Walker, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar, and me in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance LOLsuit. This means that when we cite the case in the future, we can (and will) append cert. denied as a way of letting a court know that there is no question that we won and TDPK lost, and that the trial court did not err when it found in our favor on the basis of truth.

There was never any real prospect that the Court of Appeals would take Kimberlin’s appeal, so rather than clutter their docket, Aaron Walker was the only one of the respondents to file an opposition to the petition. That and the record from the courts below was sufficient.

It’s pleasant when a thing proceeds as I foresaw.

UPDATE—The Gentle Readers should note that the Scribd document above is Aaron Walker’s opposition to Kimberlin’s petition. It is not the Court’s order. That was only one sentence long.

17 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. There is a part of me that want’s to ask Matt Osborne and Neal Rauhauser, “hey is this thing on”.

    Or more to the point “hows this working out for you?” Good for you?

    Because this will literally never not be funny.

    (((Matt Osborne)))

    @BullyVille Well, in about 11 days I expect you’ll make good on all of Neal’s back child support. So there’s that.
    11:58 AM – 7 May 2014

  2. Relying on the legal expertise of Brett Kimberlin is not something that anyone wise or cautious would do. Of course some are neither wise nor cautious.

  3. But…..But…….But………Brett Kimberlin can now testify in Maryland Courts!!!!!! So there!!!!!! He is going destroy you guys in future cases!!

    Hummmm…….is this the same Brett Kimberlin who has multiple criminal convictions including perjury??!! Ha ha ha. This new law is an absolute gift to Team Free Speech, cause he will now be cross examined. Plus when a jury gets to hear from Brett they will know exactly what we know.

    • It’s also the same Kimberlin that demanded to be able to testify, was GRANTED the right to testify, then hid in the corner and refused to testify. And somehow the morons on Team Pedo think that’s a great victory. SMH.

      • And he sent a minor child to testify on his behalf, over the strong objections of the judge. He refused to take the stand because he had sued at least three experts on his background. He would have been open to all sorts of questions about his character and relationships.

  4. It doesn’t take weeks of preparation to say, “I am not a pedophile.” The judge practically begged the puny pedo to say it. But no, didn’t happen.

    In fact, I don’t recall the terrified tiny terrorist making a denial under oath at all. Does anyone remember an affidavit or even a pleading filed under oath where a specific denial is made?

  5. Pingback: Maryland Court of Appeals, You Perfectly Understand Team Kimberlin | Dave Alexander & Company with David Edgren and Gus Bailey – The Artisan Craft Blog

  6. I like the bit where the incestuous crowd at the stupid “news” article site (I can’t be bothered to go look what it’s name is… or link it) is crowing that no one ever, ever I say, has trotted out a certified ginyuuwine copy of the legal conviction of Mr. Kimby (the White Lyin) for perjury.
    I would think that is easily rectified and stuffed up his cakehole where he likes to store distasteful documents that he doesn’t want anyone else to se.
    MMMMm, court documents taste goo-oo–od!

  7. Back home we’d probably say something like “Looks like that boy’s catfish mouth done overloaded his tiny litigant ass.”

  8. Whoever wrote that REALLY has Kimberlin’s number. S/he destroys him.

    “It may seem harsh for this Respondent t conclude that the Petitioner is probably being dishonest, but this Court will see throughout the remainder of this Opposition that the Petitioner is in the habit of misstating the truth even after his misstatements are pointed out to him and even when they can be easily detected”

    I believe the term is “poleaxed”

Leave a Reply