Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Well, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin definitely had a severe Monday yesterday.

First, Judge Mason issued a Rule 2-507 letter which will probably result in the dismissal of the unserved defendants in the Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (II) RICO Retread LOLsuit. Then, Judge Hazel denied another couple of motions in the Kimberlin v. Team Themis, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit.

And last, but not least, I filed this in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. case yesterday.

The new summonses are Docket Items 25, 26, and 27.

UPDATE—This popped up on PACER after I had finished writing this post—

Yep. The Dread Performer Kimberlin’s band Op-Critical needs to do a cover of Monday, Monday.

27 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

    • Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(3) and District of Maryland Local Rule 102.3 require court approval before pro se parties can serve subpoenas on third parties. It does not appear either on the face of the subpoena or the docket that the court has authorized the issuance of this subpoena. When we requested a copy of the authorization, you did not provide one.
      BK needs to have his probation revoked, just think as an admitted FBI informant–also a suspected “short eyes”– how much fun he would have back in lockup.

        • A show cause! Good thinking, because Hazel will hear that BK forged a summons from his court and be really, really mad about it and do something then!

          Oh, wait….

          • If Hazel shrugged at the poor pro se then, he might not anymore. He specifically refused Kimberlin’s demand to have the same subpoena power as a member of the bar. Hazel told him specifically he had to get the court’s approval. I’d like to hear Kimberlin’s shuffling excuses about his not knowing any better.

  1. I suppose the whole point of this Kimberlin fellow is to establish once and for all exactly how many people need to be vexed before one is legally declared vexatious. As an added bonus, it helps to show that the legal system truly is blind, in that it is incapable of seeing bad behavior in liberals. Kafka was a prophet.

    • Kafka was a prophet.

      This is true … but let’s be honest here. His world view had some bugs in it.

        • I agree, and since this blog is my castle (so to speak), perhaps I should exercise some judgment and ask that we hold the puns in check. That shouldn’t be too much of a trial.

          • Leave it to a quantum physicist to talk about Kafka pun matters without describing the charges. 😀

          • Someone,

            That’s just one of John’s quarks. It has a certain charm.

Leave a Reply