There has been some progress in the Hoge v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit. I now have the paperwork confirming service of process on two of the defendants. A third defendant has not only been served, he has responded by serving me with a motion to dismiss which I will, of course, oppose. That opposition and some other matters will be dealt with this week.
I wonder if the deputy discovered [REDACTED] illegal grow while effecting service?
Are there any proctologists who moonlight as process servers?
http://kimberlinunmask.com/files/mst3ku162.jpg
Since there are twelve named defendants in the suit, has anyone yet called them The Dirty Dozen?
What’s Latin for “make the rubble bounce”? 🙂