Yes, I Have 582 Documents on Scribd

So what? I share a lot of stuff, but that seems to bother the Cabin Boy™,Cheddar201603052115Z

The blog post linked to in that tweet falsely implies that it was not possible for me to have downloaded the Cabin Boy’s™ motion to disqualify Aaron Walker as defense counsel in his LOLsuit VI: The Undiscovered Krendler. Based on that false claim, he spins up a story that tries to show that I was engaged in improper activity in publishing the documents.

He’s lying.

1. The Cabin Boy sent this tweet.Cheddar201603042251ZSince it includes what appears to be the image of a motion in his LOLsuit, I clicked on the link and found a pdf file of his Motion to Disqualify. The tweet was sent at 5:51 pm ET while I was on the road commuting from work. I saw it after I arrived home. I spoke with Aaron Walker to verify that he had been served with the motion and then I published it at 7:39 pm ET.

2. Coincidentally, Schmalfeldt logged in to Hogewash! just after I posted his motion.

3. At around 10 pm the following links were live on Scribd and were not private:

4. The exhibits were available for download, and those links remained public until the middle of the morning today, just after Schmalfeldt again visited this site.

As I said, Schmalfeldt is a liar and not a very good one at that. After concocting his tale of private posting, he forgot to memory hole his earlier tweets pointing to his public Scribd post.

Bill Schmalfeldt has dug himself a rather deep hole, and he is ignoring the First Rule of Holes—to stop digging. Publishing yet another defamatory blog post about me will not help him. Indeed, he may find that it will cost him dearly. A wiser man might consider a retraction and an apology, but we’re dealing with the Cabin Boy™.

UPDATE—I’m told that the Cabin Boy™ has tweeted that I’m not fat. Really? Then I guess I must be undertall because the chart at the doctor’s office says I’m six inches too short for my weight.

UPDATE 2—The Cabin Boy™ has made a career recently of coming up with a half-baked/assed scheme to put something over on one of his enemies and of getting caught every time. The Gentle Reader may remember how he forged a Society of Professional Journalists membership record for me. That was a couple of years ago. Since he’s moved to Wisconsin, he’s been caught engaging in copyright fraud by claiming the work of Paul Krendler. If that was a plan to force Krendler to sue him, it didn’t work. I got the book taken down because he had infringed one of my blog posts as well. Krendler didn’t have to do a thing. Schmalfeldt got caught forging emails that he claimed were sent by Lynn Thomas. He got nailed two different ways. One related to message content and the other related to sloppy pixel editing.

I could go on with other examples, but a recurring theme seems to be that Bill Schmalfeldt grabs at an idea before he fully understands it. He cooks up what he believes is a brilliant scheme which quickly blows up in his face when confronted by people who know how things really work. This theme keeps recurring in his lawfare, and his loco motion du jour is just the latest example of his special way of failing.

60 thoughts on “Yes, I Have 582 Documents on Scribd

  1. What I find very interesting is this bit of typically debunked Schmalfeldt dissembling:

    He now says he never published the exhibits, and to prove it he offers a screen cap of his Scribd page…

    where the exhibits have been published! Clearly someone in St. Francis started the day with a nice hot cup of DERP laced with Johnnie Walker (it’s red! Vroom! VROOM!!).

    But that’s not even the best part.

    He never published them (except he did), so why have the four exhibits in that screen cap been read, respectively, 32, 33, 28, and 33 times?


      • Someone remind him to breath; I’d hate for the lulz to end early due to technical errors.

        On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:33 PM, hogewash wrote:

        > SPQR commented: “He gets stupider by the day.” >

    • Wait a minute here, he published an exhibit that he claims proves that BK is not a terrorist, but from reading the headline it says brett kimberlin convicted of being the “Speedway Bomber”.

    • He was having them proof read by the Association of Christmas Eve clerks that have an African tinge.

  2. And Scribd, based on what I’ve heard, keeps pretty good track of accesses to the documents in its user accounts. Hey, Mr. Schmalfeldt, I accessed one or more of your “private” documents last night directly from your Scribd account. Want to place a little wager on whether Scribd’s records will back me up? My browser also keeps a record. Hmmmmm…

    • “One would think that if someone were PROUD of his statements on a Facebook page, he wouldn’t be threatening a libel suit against someone who merely reported on those statements.

      See, in order to be libel (which Roy incorrectly calls “slander), it has to be defamatory. It has to be untrue. It has to cast a person in a bad light. And if your own words are defamatory, then pal, I don’t know what to tell you!”

      Hmmm…Sarah might find this interesting.

    • The Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt wrote:

      “Then, some gibbering fool identified only as “Operation Burn Notice” (which WOULD be a libelous statement if I were to IDENTIFY OBN, but since he or she hides behind an alias, there is no libel)… ”


  3. To summarize Brett …. Err, Cabin Boy’s brilliant argument: Even though Brett is a violent felon, perjuror, forger and drug dealer that was convicted of a bombing campaign intended to distract from a homicide investigation, he isn’t a terrorist and it’s a lie to call him one.


    • Serious side effects of Ambien(Zolpidem) are:

      Getting out of bed while not being fully awake and performing an activity that you are not aware you are doing, such driving a vehicle, sleep-walking, preparing and eating food, making phone calls, or having sex
      Abnormal thoughts or behaviors, such as aggressiveness, abnormal extroversion, confusion, agitation, hallucinations, worsening of depression, or suicidal thoughts or actions
      Memory loss
      Sleepiness during the day

  4. Everybody relax. Nothing to burst a blood vessel over. It’s just a motion to disqualify a lawyer for violations of his professional ethics. Let me suggest a topic. The Sundance Film Festival. Favorite movies. Go.

    • I’d suggest what you could go do with yourself but lack the perversion needed to come up with anything you haven’t already tried.

    • I suggest NUTS!

      Or perhaps you’d be interested in The Intervention.

      All These Sleepless Nights must surely be in the running…


      Thus ends my first comment here.

    • You are a delusional buffoon. It’s a joke motion that will be passed around the court clerks for laughs. It’s a sign of your mental incompetence and Brett psychopathology.

    • Oh great Pro-Se genius (who the bar should admit without ever attending law school), could you pray tell me how a Wisconsin judge is responsible for upholding the D.C. bar and their professional ethics? Is the judge a member of the D.C. bar and a voting member for disciplinary actions there? Kudos though for defending Kimberlin and the Speedway bombings, you terrorist sympathizer, and please note I use the term terrorist not statutorily defined but in the common language usage of the word … and also note that’s not defamatory but an opinion.

        • You are the incompetent perverted clown slavishly copying the delusions and brazen lies of a violent criminal into legal pleadings in service to his campaign to make the world shut up.

          Not us.

      • It’s also true. He terrorized speedway, blew up a police car. He caused maiming of more than one person, and responsible for the death of one. Not to mention his other serious crimes, both suspected an proved. He’s a terrorist bomber. He should be in prison.

    • At this point, you would be a fool to file this motion.

      The Zombies and Lickspiddles have shown you all the holes in the motion and exhibits.

      Did your best bomber friend (bbf) write all or part of it for you? We won’t tell anyone he is practicing law without a license.

      Did your bbf ever tell you whether he was a top guy or bottom guy? A journalist like you should find and report the facts. Inquiring minds want to know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s