Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Yesterday was the deadline for The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin to cut bait or fish with respect to his proposed amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. Team Themis, et al. RICO 2: Electric Boogaloo LOLsuit. He cut bait. Sorta/kinda. This is what he filed—

He says he can’t file an amended complaint, so he will supplement his original complaint with additional allegations. Here’s what Judge Hazel told him last year:

It is well-established, however, that a plaintiff cannot amend his or her complaint through the use of opposition briefs.

Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al., Case No. 13-CV-03059-GJH, Memorandum Opinion (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2015), n, 3 at 12. We’ll see how far this motion gets.

Beyond noting that there is a certain magnificence to the scope of the hallucinatory nature of the plot TDPK tries to sell with this nonsense, I have no further comment on his filing.

15 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

    • None of his responses deal with the legal issues raised in any of the MTD’s, but rather an attempt to try and sway the judge on his hallucinations. Not sure how much more rope he’s going to get, but Hazel takes his time and ensures his opinions are thorough in dismissing the case. Seems to me that the longer this goes on MTD rulings, the worse it is for the midget pedo.

  1. IAAL (I am a lawyer) and the supplement is twice improper.

    Stick a fork in this case, I believe it is over.

    • IANAL but telling someone “you must treat this as true” might as well be admitting your lying in any other context.
      It’s like when we philosophers say “for the sake of argument stipulate XYZ” we’re really saying either “XYZ is totally indefensible but help me out here” (if we’re proposing XYZ) or “XYZ is bullshit and you know it but your argument sucks even if I grant you that horrible premise” (if the other party proposed it.)

  2. IANAL, but I suspect federal judges just love it when pro se plaintiffs plead fever dreams of gossamer and bullshit, interspersed with statements of “(insert random crazy here) and you must treat this as true at this stage of the trial.”

  3. Master Hoge and Aaron, please accept my sincerest of apologies that you get referred to as “Team Two”. It’s obvious that you two belong on a much higher plane. Perhaps in the next Lolsuit.

  4. Incredibly, he didn’t use all his standard buzzwords. But he added a new one: hooligans. Wonder when/where he first heard that word.

  5. Re: the hallucinatory nature — you think he may have partaken in a bit too much of what he was smuggling back in the day?

  6. A couple serious questions that can’t possible educate him at this time:
    He seems to be merely asserting that people “Conspired” to bring attention to his past to “discredit” him. That can’t possibly be a tort can it?. “Organization X is heavily affiliated with bad person Y, don’t trust them.” Fact and opinion supported by facts. Is he taking cues from Trump?

    2) Wouldn’t summarizing the Frey documents be akin to releasing them? Am I missing something? If not the law has a serious problem from a practical standpoint.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s