Protective Order? What Protective Order?

The day after Judge Hazel denied The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s motion to amend his complaint in the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit, TDPK filed this response to LA County’s opposition to his motion to amend. It’s not only a day late, it also seems to violate the terms of the Protective Order issued by Judge Hazel. Indeed, because the judge has now included me under the terms of the order, I have redacted a series of what appear to be direct quotes from privileged documents provided by Patterico during discovery.

I also note that TDPK has made a number of allegations toward the end of this filing that relate to claims he has made in previous suits that he lost and, therefore, should be estopped from raising again. I don’t wish to make any further public comments about this filing.


19 thoughts on “Protective Order? What Protective Order?

  1. What the hell? Since when is Aaron Walker running the “most vile anti-Muslim hateblog” Since when is Barrett Brown even involved with this whole case, much less acting as a rep for Anonymous?

    Brett is making allegations out of his own paranoid fantasies.

  2. I take back what I said on the other thread… self screwing dimmer bulbs are not as rare as I’d imagined.

  3. Wow.

    He’s got balls, I’ll give him that. Between [Redacted – don’t educate the midget] and [Redacted – don’t educate the midget] and his summary of [Redacted – don’t educate the midget] it’s like reading when Bill said [Redacted – don’t educate the monkey, either].

  4. I USED to think that no one could be stupider then Bill “Stolen Valor” Schmalfeldt. I might have been wrong.

  5. I read BK’s “Response” above and kept saying to myself on each of his points: “So what?” Is any of the activity described illegal or criminal? It doesn’t seem so to me. Also, how does any of this injure BK? He doesn’t describe any.

Leave a Reply