Here’s an interesting exchange from the 3 September hearing on motions to dismiss in the Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. RICO Retread LOLsuit.
THE COURT: And the article you just read to me is an article where they post a picture of you and they said State Department introduces Arab diplomats, Arab somebody to convicted bomber. Well you are a convicted bomber so none of that would be true, I’m sorry none of that would be untrue.
MR. KIMBERLIN: The context here is to destroy my ability to have a contract with the State Department. And then they go again go after my funders. Of course these things you know they can say that I’m a bomber. They can do all that kind of stuff all day long.
THE COURT: You agree they can say it?
MR. KIMBERLIN: I can say that, yeah. I don’t have any problem with that.
There also was this exchange later in the hearing.
THE COURT: Okay, so not just blogging about Brett Kimberlin you’ve said to me a couple times they can blog about me all they want, those are your words.
MR. KIMBERLIN: Right.
THE COURT: So it’s not just this blogging, it’s making specific accusations.
So The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin was given a chance to amend his complaint and properly specify what had been done to defame him. My codefendants and I have filed motions to dismiss that amended complaint because TDPK is still failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We may learn how the court will rule on one of those motions today.