Prevarication Du Jour

The Cabin Boy™ is tweeting nonsense again.TheMerryWidower201511290435ZTheMerryWidower201511290436ZOf course, his error is probably excusable. After all, Paul Krendler’s post on 18 April, 2014, was a parody of one of the Cabin Boy’s™ from the day before called A Nice Visit From the Police. Here’s a link to the rss feed of the post which the Cabin Boy™ memory-holed in the middle of 2014. Scroll down to 04/17/14–16:06.

It could be that Schmalfeldt has made the quite natural assumption that no one bothered to read his blog post. However, anyone who might have read it would have immediately seen what Krendler was parodying. Who knows? Maybe Krendler actually read Schmalfeldt’s post the day before.

UPDATE—I have pdf and html backups of the Cabin Boy’s™ original post, but I can’t publish a copy of the post here because of the settlement agreement in the Hoge v. Schmalfeldt copyright lawsuit. However, I’m not the only person with such backups.

50 thoughts on “Prevarication Du Jour

      • Even filed a DMCA takedown notice:

        “I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

        I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

        I acknowledge that a copy of this infringement notice, including any contact information I provided above (address, telephone number, and email address), will be forwarded to the user who uploaded the content at issue.

        Digital signature: William Schmalfeldt

        Signed on: 2015-10-30 17:04:38”

        • So… if he files a suit based on his latest “theory”, doesn’t that mean he has to create a court document in which he swears someone else is Krendler? During the period he claims to have been Krendler?

          Or possibly he honestly believes he was Krendler, as a result of his dementia?

      • Yeah, but he was so sure he was Krendler that he registered copyright on a bunch of stuff Krendler wrote.

        So now he’s not Krendler? Where does that leave his copyright application, I wonder?

        I know where it leaves me: in need of more popcorn!

        • A reasonable person could conclude that a plaintiff, almost by definition, cannot find material defamatory if he fraudulently obtained the copyrights and engaged in a for-profit enterprise with it.

          Hey, aren’t American juries bound by the “reasonable person” standard?

  1. Can someone scan Fat Willies twitter output for the number of times he ABSOLUTELY KNEW that Paul Krendler was Lynn Thomas? She popped up only weeks ago to Fat Willie’s harassment. It was just days ago that his fat a$$ was threatening Lynn, her husband and her parents. Now he has changed his mind and will ramp up the harassment on his new victim.

    His life has revolved around the identity of a complete stranger for the past 12-18 months. A stranger who he has never met in person, never spoken to over the phone and never received anything from. PK isn’t in any type of legitimate legal jeopardy from the Blob, neither criminal or civil. Remember Bill, butthurt is NOT a crime and the only way you know what and if Krendler says anything about you is to go searching the web. That’s right Folks, no one directly contacts Billy and harasses him, rather he must go seek what he believes is harassment on the interwebs.

    Once he lands “the white whale” Krendler, then what? The Blob will think he has finally landed his worst enemy, but most know this isn’t true. Because Bill Schmalfeldt is Bill Schmanfledt’s worst enemy, has been his entire life.

    • Well, William lies some. More exactly, he’s a lying machine, designed to execute that one function, repeatedly, until his parts wear out. The alcoholism and schizophrenia are a feature, not a bug, in the basic functionality.

      It really is too bad that he’s too much of a DUMBFUCK to get one of his lulzsuits to a jury. On the other hand, one of his defendants might someday.

    • May I suggest that Paul Krendler is a character in a movie, and it might be a little hard to nail down “his” identity using Schmalfeldtian logic. If you’ve conclusively proven more than one person to be Paul Krendler, you need to reassess your strategy.
      One more thing: If there are pictures all over the room with push pins and yards of string connecting them, you can stop now. You’re bonkers.

    • Lord, I hope so. I’ve missed the cognitive dissonance of the Feldtchart so. I long for the day when a judge decides to pretend that one is actual evidence and actually looks at it.

  2. Mr. Hoge, I give you express permission to print my post from the date in question. Unless you don’t actually have it and are lying — again. Feel free to post and publish, and mark on the post you were given express permission to do so by the author.

    [I don’t see the need to waste bandwidth republishing all of the Cabin Boy’s™ post, but here’s the first part of it.—wjjhoge]

    [The Cabin Boy™ can repost it if, as he claims, he still has the original files. If he doesn’t and if it becomes useful, I can post a pdf of the original along with the html code to Scribd.—wjjhoge]

    • Call me dense, but I fail to see what this proves, other than Bill can, at times, interact with local law enforcement without peeing himself.

      • I think BS has now decided that LS has to be PK; with only 7.8 billion people in the world he has to get it right eventually if only he just keeps trying.

        • No, Bill Schmalfeldt would not “get it right eventually if only he just [kept] trying.” To eventually get it, Bill Schmalfeldt would have to keep track of the people he has faildoxxed and never suspect anyone on that list every again. Otherwise, he would persist in his current pattern of rotating between a handful of suspects. Given an infinite number of Bill Schmalfeldts searching an infinite amount of time for “Paul Krendler,” such a search would only result the same set of wrong suspects being accused an infinite number of times.

          • Shorter Schmalfeldt: “If I keep doing the same thing over and over again, I just HAVE to get a different result!”

    • “Waah, I demand HOOOOOOOOOOGE post my words on his far more popular website, because my website is gathering cobwebs and tumbleweeds!”


    • Heh. Here again is the dichotomy of giving a thumbs up to a CBBS comment ; if only for WJJH’s addenda.

Leave a Reply