Throughout his campaign of lawfare, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has made stunningly foolish claims. This is from his opposition that he filed to my motion to dismiss his first amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness LOLsuit. The “they” it refers to are Aaron Walker and me.Let’s take a look at what TDPK is alleging and how those exhibits relate to it.
Taking Exhibit E first, we see that it is from Aaron Walker’s Allergic to Bull website.The only thing in the post that is remotely similar to the alleged contents might be the link to the video showing that TDPK was lying about being assaulted. I supposed that could be stretched to being an intimidating graphic if someone were afraid of being caught filing a false complaint. Additionally, the two DONATE buttons led to legal defense funds and not to Aaron’s pockets.
Exhibit D goes even further astray. It is a repost of a TKPOTD at Paul Lemmen’s old Dead Citizen’s Rights Society site. Paul had faithfully reposted my text, and he included something that Hogewash! did not have and has never has had—a DONATE button for Bomber Sues Bloggers. There’s nothing in the except of the post that is presented in the exhibit that is threatening or intimidating—unless one is afraid that an error in a claim could be traced to perjury.
So the evidence TDPK submitted to the court with his opposition did not support his allegations against either Aaron or me.
At the risk of educating the midget, it seems obvious that one should present evidence is on point and that supports one’s claims. TDPK has yet to learn that lesson.
It’s utterly AMAZING how he thinks the judges are supposed to be wowed by his legal brilliance when he submits exhibits like these that do nothing to support his allegations. “Conclusory,” anyone? Beuhler? Beuhler?
I don’t think it’s your fault if the truth intimidates him.
He has some strange idea that it’s unlawful discrimination to point up a felon’s felonies, and harassment to publicize his crimes.
That is because he wants to hide his criminal past (his ‘secret exoneration’ lie is part of this) so as to be able to operate his ‘non-profit’ scam without donors becoming aware of his past. He still denies his past, has not even attempted to pay the judgement against him, instead suing the victim and survivor of his actions.
I am a former criminal, the main difference seems to be that I admit my crimes and have completed my sentence. I have also reformed my life. I wish Brett would do the same.
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
Brett’s “donate” button on his Levy Jeans was the start of his problems in the 70’s