A while back, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin filed for alternate service on several of my codefendants in the Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. RICO Retread LOLsuit. He included copies of the returned envelopes allegedly contain his service of process. Those envelopes showed insufficient postage to cover Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested/Restricted Delivery, and the USPS.com tracking information on the mail does not show that Restricted Delivery was paid for.
Because Restricted Delivery is required for service of process by mail under the Maryland Rules, I filed a motion informing the court of Kimberlin’s misrepresentation of the facts and asking that he be found in contempt. It’s no surprise that he has filed an opposition to my motion.So TDPK, thinks it’s depraved and outrageous to point out that there’s insufficient postage shown for Restricted Delivery on the envelopes he submitted as evidence and that USPs tracking data verifies that Restricted Delivery was not paid for, does he? We’ll see about that.