The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin is whining about how long it takes to get paperwork processed in the Kimberlin v. Frey RICO Remnant LOLsuit.
Yes, as we’ve seen today, TDPK has trouble managing his legal schedule.
UPDATE—I guess this explains why I haven’t seen that subpoena he submitted yet.
UPDATE 2—I’m not making this up, you know—
Worlds smallest violin for worlds smallest pro se.
;D
He has filed for a dumb subpoena of PACER and an abusive subpoena of Intermarkets where he lied about their own website, and he wants less adult supervision?
Good luck with that.
The court doesn’t appear to approve of Kimberlin’s subpoenas.
Why, so you can commit more forgery?
He must be on judge Hazel’s last nerve.
Also on Judge Mason’s. He’s winning.
I am writing to ask that you ilssue an order to the Clerk to allow me get my subpoenas stamped at the Cierk’s office rather than submit each one to the Court for approval.
Face palm.
Oh, and pretty pretty please don’t read any of the ones I’ve already submitted. Just please don’t.
Why not just skip directly to the end and ask the court to issue a directed verdict?
Because he knows how that would turn out?
Why not just ask the Court to issue a blank, signed notice of final judgment?
I don’t see how he answered anything in the motion other than that the delay in delivering the material. I’m not a lawyer, but that looks like an original motion, not a response.
Wait wait wait…..
Let me get this straight.. he’s mad that Frey maintained his blog and talked about Democrats?
http://i.imgur.com/IFcKChf.png
Briefly, Brett is an ass.
Why would he even mention Mr. Frey had a 3 week murder trial? That’s beyond STUPID. The judge was a lawyer himself and would upon seeing a 3 week murder trial be somewhat sympathetic. Kimberlin even mentions and digs his “dismissal grave” even deeper that Frey’s lawyers were busy litigating another case and one he describes as a loss. Brett, if you’re reading this, that case you brought to the judge’s attention before Frey and his lawyers do; Judge Hazel will cite that case at least once in his dismissal of your case. Remember you brought it up first.
He mentioned the murder trial because Frey mentioned it; the same applies to the other case.
Other than anything to do with that, I suppose you’re spot on.
You’re right (I’ve only have been aware of this story for about three months) and I didn’t read Frey’s motion and must have missed it. But I do feel confidant like you, Judge Hazel will mention the loss Kimberlin described as a loss in his dismissal.
Unlike Team Kimberlin, I enjoy a good education and being corrected. That’s how we learn!
RULZ matter? When did that happen?
Limberger would pair nicely with that whine.