The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin is scurrying about trying to put together a case against Patterico to keep the remnant of the RICO Madness LOLsuit alive. He’s asked the court to issue these subpoenas.
I may have more to say about this in a day or two.
hogewash
Never pick a fight with a man who buys pixels by the terabyte.
He has no evidence for anything and he’s just fishing. This will not go well for him.
Did I hear a corporate veil being pierced?
It sound more like a rip.
Because of the e-mail address or because of something else?
He just ask for privileged information. Duh.
Yup, among other problems with these.
What does Nadia Naffe have to do with the swatting of Patrick Frey?
If memory serves, Naffe once infiltrated Project Veritas (James O’Keefe) and sued both Keefe and Frey. In addition, she was/is a confederate of Rauhauser.
Here’s what Patterico had to say on that:
http://patterico.com/index.php?s=Naffe&submit=Search
Yes, but what does any of that have to do with Kimberlin’s suit with Frey?
OK, it’s gonna take a while to get through all that; I’ll see if I can answer my own question….
You will find that they are all connected.
It’s like it’s one big conspiracy or something.
Nadia Naffe’s lawsuits against Frey and O’Keefe are as thin and vexatious as you can get. She’s a close ally of the leftist scum Rauhauser. I read through her blog before she made it private. Her complaints about O’Keefe were the equivalent of a 14 year old girl having a snit fight. She was really trying hard to create an actionable complaint out of thin air. I hope Frey smacks her down hard in court.
There is no plausible connection. It’s just fishing.
Stogie said, “Her complaints about O’Keefe were the equivalent of a 14 year old girl having a snit fight.”
She sounds like a 14-year-old girl?
I think we found why Kimberlin’s interested.
Didn’t Patterico already win as similar suit brought by Naffe?
She appealed and the 9th circuit tossed one count back to the lower court to move forward.
Why on earth would he subpoena Hoge? This is really fishing and harassment.
Gaaa! Kimberlin has finally found out that Mr. Hoge, in addition to being a quantum mechanic and a rocket scientist, is the “Super-Secret Director of Nefarious Activity” for both the LA County DA’s office and the LA County Sheriff’s department. All is lost.
and his attorneys sleep w judges on command
Why would he subpoena Hoge? I think the answer to that is perfectly clear: because he can. He’s been trying to get Hoge for a while, and probably thinks he can use the discovery process to do so.
Does Hoge have information relevant to TDPK’s claim? Probably not. But it’s at least one of the subpoena’s I see that isn’t flawed on its face.
Take a closer look.
The PACER part is truly nutty. Why does he think he has a right to this? And great idea to get pacer itself to file a Mot. to Quash or similar relief.
I would think that it is an attempt way to get info on litigation strategy by analysis of searches on PACER, as well names of individuals who have done searches.
Man oh man, assume it isn’t quashed because…stupid.
Tell me Patterico’s team wouldn’t submit a similar subpoena for BK’s searches.
Dear word they’d likely tell a lot of things.
They’d probably have to figure out which “charity” has the account.
He is looking for more victims to sue.
It’s a shame telephone books are so thin these days.
And in other news you’ve heard before, Bill is suing the world. Again.
Reminds me of the subpoenas he filed in the Virginia case. Then, Brett Kimberlin asked for any information concerning Aaron Walker’s SWAT-ting. That resulted in a Motion to Quash that, if my recollection is correct, pointed out that police investigations into ongoing investigations are privileged. Here we are three years later and Brett Kimberlin is asking for the same information for another SWAT-ting.
I’m guessing that finding out information about police procedure when they investigate swattings might be useful for future reference. Just guessing.
How does Brett get people to believe his stories?
Hmm… on Our Host’s subpoena, it’s for “related to Patrick Frey and his swatting incident.”
On the LA County Sheriffs Department, it’s “regarding the alleged ‘swatting’ incident.”
On the LA DA’s office, it’s “an alleged swatting of him.”
In the first, it’s an established fact.
In the second, it’s alleged and has quotes around it.
In the third, it’s alleged and no quotes.
A sensible person would pick one usage and stick to it.
And yes, it certainly looks like JTMP is an active participant in this matter… Brett is, once again, using his “non-profit” to carry out his lawfare. That makes things even more interesting.
(If this is too close to “educating the troll,” feel free to edit or delete this. Just leave this disclaimer so it’s clear that I didn’t mind to having my comment redacted.)
Personally, Joe Nobody, I think it would be hilarious if the only paragraph Mr. Hoge redacted was your last disclaimer 😀 This is probably why I’ll never get to moderate comments on anyone’s blog…
Or if just the word “this” was redacted.
Brett is determined to walk right into court and fuck himself. I’d like to think this will end up with him going down in flames, but….Maryland.
He wouldn’t do that, ever. Because he’s not a minor.
Is one simply allowed to cross off dates and write in new ones like that? Seems VERY fishy
Lack of meaningful sanctions thus far means that Kimberlin can do… Pretty much whatever the hell he feels like.
BINGO!
IIRC your are allowed to make corrections–before they are signed by the court in the case of a pro se–if you do them in the correct way, which BK did not do.
The court also apparently doesn’t mind if you make “corrections” after official documents are signed by the court.
Yes. Even forgery on a summons does not seem to matter.
Has he repurposed documents? Not sure what’s going on there.
I would not expect so, but Brett Kimberlin has a cavalier way with documents.
Meanwhile Schmalfeldt thinks he can amend the complain while a MTD is pending. Frcp 15 makes it clear he can’t.
He’s also under the delusion that he can sue the entire universe based on one comment made by one individual.
And, nope. I’m still not Jeanette. *SMH*
One remark by one person on some obscure blog, and Schmalfeldt goes off bonkers. There must be something in that statement that hit home.
I’d love to know what tort he thinks was committed by everyone.
I’ve “known” both you and Jeanette online and on Facebook for several years now. You are both good friends but really separate individuals.
And I’m still not Sarah Ashleigh. He just will. not. stop. SMH
Thank you, Father Paul.
Who knows what the heck caused BS to run off on his Grace = Jeanette Runyon tangent. BS has been threatening to d0x me (Grace) for a looooong time now, but JUST NOW! — THIS WEEK! — has convinced himself that he tripped over some damning evidence that JUST PROVES I am Jeanette. *smh*
And, I had forgotten all about this until it just now popped into my head — but, it wasn’t all that long ago on Twitter that BS was CONVINCED Jeanette Runyon was Lynn Thomas (she’s not, of course).
#FAIL #FAIL #FAIL
Charles – everyone committed the tort of “not telling Bill what he wanted to know RIGHT NOW!!!!!!”
In this case, not telling him, paraphrased, “who Roy Schmalfeldt is, and how to locate him for service!”
The “who” is easy, “Roy Schmalfeldt” is…
(*Drum roll*)
Roy Schmalfeldt. It’s my given name. Has been since the day I was born, will be until the day I die.
The locating for service, well, that’s the trick, now, isn’t it? I like my privacy quite a bit, thank you very much, and nobody here knows how to find me. I just show up from time to time…
LAM AM NOT LAW, SCHMALFELDT AM LAW RAWR!!!!!!!
“[S]ome obscure blog…”. Charles Hudson, we at Billy Sez are cut to the quick.
Err… We prefer “microblog.” Yeah! “We may be tiny, but we’re kickin’ Bill’s hiney.”
😂
My wording was worded in a really bad way of wording. Sorry about that. I have no excuse. I consumed much popcorn yesterday evening watching the Schmalfeldt logic at work on your blog. Schmalfeldt’s work was fascinating, as Spock would say. Thanks for your blog. And your place looks lovely, by the way.
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
Bill upset about comments accusing him of rape hmmm just a day or so ago on a blog far far to the left…..
I particularly like the way Cousin Bill Schmalfeldt levers the diddler bomber’s infamy with the “playing with dynamite” sub-text. He thinks he clever and frightening, when, in fact, he’s dull and clearly bombastic. 😉
Hey, Brett Coleman Kimberlin:
Are you happy about your “excellent friend” reminding everyone that you are a convicted domestic terrorist who used bombs to blow people to pieces? Would you ever place a device to shut him up? If not, why not?
Bill Schmalfeldt is a perverted, deranged, black-hearted, soulless snake.
He even went so far as accusing you of being adjudicated of such a vile, evil act.
Even Hell may be too good for the likes of a Bill Schmalfeldt.
O/T.
We enjoyed R2L this evening, Grace. I know that was a difficult get.
Tomorrow is on us.