This bit from my Informal Response Brief file in the Fourth Circuit appeal of the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness is worth repeating for emphasis.
It is telling that Appellant states he would have been able to allege his case with proper specificity if he had been allowed to conduct discovery. See Appellant’s Lead Brief at 6, 8. This amounts to an admission that he truly was engaged in a fishing expedition in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, sanctionable conduct providing yet another reason for the lawsuit to have been dismissed.