Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Here is what Judge Hazel has had to say about The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s RICO Madness—

Kimberlin failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … Kimberlin has failed to state a claim … Kimberlin has failed to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … he has failed … he has failed … He has failed to do so … the SAC fails to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has therefore failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed … his SAC failed to identify … attempt would also fail … Kimberlin has therefore failed … Kimberlin failed … necessarily must fail … he has failed … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … claim would still fail … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has failed … would still fail … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has failed to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed … has failed to state a claim … because he has “fail[ed] to plead facts” … must be dismissed as he has failed to plead facts … Kimberlin has failed … dismissal of § 1985(2) claim for failure to allege … his failure … Kimberlin has failed to state claims …

Plaintiff is mistaken.

Yep, that about covers it.

41 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


  1. While it’s a good start, and clearly trending in a good direction, I think there’s at least a bit more ground to cover.


  2. “So, what’s your point?”

    — William Smellfart, Twitter Attorney at Law, collector of multiple court orders from multiple states for harassment and stalking.


  3. Attn Zombies….Comedy Bleg……D;………..D;…………………Green 52………….Blue 18………….Scissor……….Scissor………Hike!!


  4. I picked up a common theme in that post but exactly what is eluding me. I know Kimberlin seems to have done something but I can’t quite nail down what. Oh wait FAIL.


  5. I doubt I am showing a reckless disregard for the truth if I opine that Brett Kimberlin is now an adjudicated FAILURE in addition to any other adjudicatied titles he may have been awarded.


  6. If I were at home in front of my PC, I would trim the classic Strother Martin film clip from Cool Hand Luke , and post it to YouTube… to wit:

    What we got here is… failure [full stop].

    Maybe someone else can run with it.


    • And “asking” for something via Twitter from the one he is suing is not only ineffective and inappropriate, it fails to comply with the rules of civil procedure.


      • He keeps asking for things from someone who has had the court order him to stop all contact. Maybe he should focus on following the court order.


      • Wasn’t the proof just another exercise in Schmalogic? Proof that was quickly debunked as at best self-fulfilling and at worst completely un-testable?


      • I’m reading “An Office and a Spy,” a novel about the Dreyfus Affair and came across this….
        “Dreyfus interrupted: ‘So the bordereau must have been written by me, both because it resembles my handwriting and because it doesn’t?’
        ‘Exactly.'”


  7. Isn’t he treading a rather fine line here?

    At what point does this become “contact”?

    If you are posting demands and requesting these demands to be passed on to John, it seems that it is getting quite close to a violation.


    • It’s all contact IMO but then again IANAL. He doesn’t seem to remember that there was a real, live person who was designated to facilitate communication with John in regard to legal issues. At least there was at one point.

      But this? Willful stomping on the peace order. Again. SMH


    • Ooooh, Ooooh can I guess why Mr. H. ignores the pathetic blob? … Uhm because he’d really rather have nothing to do with Bill, and if Bill would have stopped contacting Mr. H. he wouldn’t be facing a judge in 20 days?

      What do I win?


      • Well, Gus, you have won an all expenses not paid trip to Bill’s court date in April where you can view the insane one in all his corpulent glory! How exCITING!


      • Ewww. Is there a cash alternative? I’m willing to pay $5 to not go there. Well bitcoin since it’s just electrons, like me!


  8. The Team Kimberlin bunch are pathetically narcissistic.

    “I am suing you in a court of law so you MUST respond to my extra-judicial demands.”

    A relatively stupid child would know that a defendant has no incentive to cooperate with a plaintiff and no duty to do so unless required by the court. In other words, the posturings of Witless Willie are absurd to anyone with a milligram of sense. And YET the witless one can ignore sense because he is the simultaneous author, actor, and applauding audience for his dramatic fantasies of competence.

Leave a Reply