Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

As I noted earlier, I’ll be filing my reply to The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s omnibus opposition to the motions to dismiss his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness on Monday. Here’s a bit of preview.reply p9Stay tuned.

12 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. Is it reasonable here to bring up Brett’s lawfare from the 80s and 90s?
    Or his various other suits in the current decade. They all bolster Kimberlin’s statement to Dave Weigel.

      • Pardon me for belaboring the point even more:

        Notice Brett Kimberlin’s original email to Patterico is vague and doesn’t specify what claims are defamatory or untrue. Asked to “specify anything in my post that you claim is false,” Brett produces a response about 5x as long as Patterico’s mail. It does not specify a single claim. Not one.

        When Brett did sue Patterico, his original complaint was long and full of innuendo, but still lacked this specificity. Two amendments added Rauhauser idiocy about “Team Themis” without correcting this issue.

        Brett Kimberlin gives us a good lesson here, which is that such vagueness and duplicity is a hallmtark of censorious thugs. This kind of thuggery deserves a persistent and strong response to prevent him from committing any more acts of frivolous lawfare against any new victims. His 50 year jail sentence has so far deterred him from bombing or murdering, so it is definitely possible to deter him further.

        And Brett Kimberlin is a pedophile.

        I hope everyone reading will consider aiding Brett’s current lawfare victims, via and tipjars, for as long as it takes.

  2. TDPK’s strategy is pretty clear. Any discussion of his activities on the internet inhibits his ability to draw donations to his non-profit orgs, which appear to be his sole means of support. When his history of terrorism, bombing, perjury, ducking judgements, being the only suspect in at least one murder, and openly declared attraction for underaged females are honestly posted and discussed, it makes donors say, “Ew!” and look elsewhere to give away money.

    But he can hardly go to court with a complaint that the truth hurts. And there have been no false or malicious libels against him. So he hides behind the “shucks yer honor I’m just a humble pro se defendant trying to raise a kid and run two foundations while suing people, gimme a break why doncha” and submitting clouds and clouds of smoke, amounting to no specific claims and no specific evidence.

    So far, it has worked pretty well. He will lose this suit like the state case, but he isn’t in it to win money, he knows he won’t by now with his 2-109 record so far. He’s out to aggravate you bloggers, cost you time and money, and especially discourage others who don’t want to waste a year fighting a nonsense case from writing about him.

    He won’t stop until someone stops him. A judge, a target who isn’t willing to settle it in court, an irate father. He won’t stop on his own. So far, it costs him nothing, or nearly nothing.

Leave a Reply