As I noted earlier, I’ll be filing my reply to The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s omnibus opposition to the motions to dismiss his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness on Monday. Here’s a bit of preview.
Stay tuned.
hogewash
Never pick a fight with a man who buys pixels by the terabyte.
Is it reasonable here to bring up Brett’s lawfare from the 80s and 90s?
Or his various other suits in the current decade. They all bolster Kimberlin’s statement to Dave Weigel.
Stay tuned.
” I don’t want to get into a pissing match with you. I have filed over a hundred lawsuits and another one will be no sweat for me. On the other hand, it will cost you a lot of time and money and for what.” — Brett Kimberlin in an email to Patterico/Patrick Frey. (October 2010)
(The entire Team Kimberlin anti First Amendment Strategy.)
For context:
http://patterico.com/2010/10/11/brett-kimberlin-threatens-to-sue-me/
Pardon me for belaboring the point even more:
Notice Brett Kimberlin’s original email to Patterico is vague and doesn’t specify what claims are defamatory or untrue. Asked to “specify anything in my post that you claim is false,” Brett produces a response about 5x as long as Patterico’s mail. It does not specify a single claim. Not one.
When Brett did sue Patterico, his original complaint was long and full of innuendo, but still lacked this specificity. Two amendments added Rauhauser idiocy about “Team Themis” without correcting this issue.
Brett Kimberlin gives us a good lesson here, which is that such vagueness and duplicity is a hallmtark of censorious thugs. This kind of thuggery deserves a persistent and strong response to prevent him from committing any more acts of frivolous lawfare against any new victims. His 50 year jail sentence has so far deterred him from bombing or murdering, so it is definitely possible to deter him further.
And Brett Kimberlin is a pedophile.
I hope everyone reading will consider aiding Brett’s current lawfare victims, via bombersuesbloggers.com and tipjars, for as long as it takes.
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
I’ll take ‘statements against interest’ for 2,000.000 Alex …
I see what you did there. 🙂
Well played, Paul.
Are you suggesting that John Hoge is in the Double Jeopardy round, Paul?
I was thinking something more along the lines of, “You are traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. Your next stop, the Lawfare Zone!”
Example of bad faith?
His entire friggin’ life!
Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog.
TDPK’s strategy is pretty clear. Any discussion of his activities on the internet inhibits his ability to draw donations to his non-profit orgs, which appear to be his sole means of support. When his history of terrorism, bombing, perjury, ducking judgements, being the only suspect in at least one murder, and openly declared attraction for underaged females are honestly posted and discussed, it makes donors say, “Ew!” and look elsewhere to give away money.
But he can hardly go to court with a complaint that the truth hurts. And there have been no false or malicious libels against him. So he hides behind the “shucks yer honor I’m just a humble pro se defendant trying to raise a kid and run two foundations while suing people, gimme a break why doncha” and submitting clouds and clouds of smoke, amounting to no specific claims and no specific evidence.
So far, it has worked pretty well. He will lose this suit like the state case, but he isn’t in it to win money, he knows he won’t by now with his 2-109 record so far. He’s out to aggravate you bloggers, cost you time and money, and especially discourage others who don’t want to waste a year fighting a nonsense case from writing about him.
He won’t stop until someone stops him. A judge, a target who isn’t willing to settle it in court, an irate father. He won’t stop on his own. So far, it costs him nothing, or nearly nothing.