Last year, Bill Schmalfeldt photoshopped my face into a couple of pornographic homoerotic images which he published on the Internet. Those images and their publication formed part of the basis for the extension of the peace order against him that was issued last December.
One of the images of my face was lifted from a college year book picture. While the yearbook was published for my sophomore year, the picture may be a file photo that was actually been taken in autumn of 1965 during my freshman year. I turned 18 on 31 December, 1965.
Thus, it is possible that one of the pornographic images Schmalfeldt published contains a juvenile image of me.
I’m not sure whether this should have an “Oh. My.” or a “Heh”.
Can one do both at once?
Sure, thusly:
Heh.
I was thinking that one but didn’t know how to do embed it with my iPad.
I am still searching all the statutes for the satire exception, apparently there is a satire exception to copyright, fraud, coercion, harassment, child porn, child sex, rape, etc
Someone keeps saying it is. It must be there or why would a person keep claiming it?
Maybe that someone is feeling the fear pee running in rivers since it was pointed out to him in unambiguous terms by the late proprietor of the Running Wolf blog and he is indeed a producer of porn under the law and as such bears certain record keeping responsibilities. If he is found to have produced porn using a picture of an underage person…well, I shudder to think what the courts would do to him. But as they say….birds of a feather.
Apropos to nothing….I wonder if his excellent friend….the one that can’t prove he isn’t a pedo and that lets a convicted pedo live with his young daughters, will be accompanying him to court?
Has anyone seen the First amendment or satire clause in this random MD statute?
Anyone?
I think I found your answer EPWJ.
Mr. Hoge,
I read somewhere, that:
With you living in the Commonwealth I was wondering; have you ever heard such a thing?
Who’s bringing the popcorn?
That appears to have been quoted verbatim from a state Department of Mental Health and Hygiene website.
Heh.
Two things the Admiral is surely lacking.
Mental health and Hygiene.
Well, whaddaya know. I guess the fellow, from whom I borrowed it, has done his research.
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
The judge certainly disagreed:
If he was certain of that he’d just republish the picture. After all, he says he wiped nothing from the Mac so he must still have it right? Or of course he could acknowledge that a judge put the image under seal because of how obscene and disgusting it was and publicly apologize and admit he’s lying again.
Or he could do what he usually does and stop talking about it realizing he can’t defend it and hope others forget about his foray into gay pornography.
But if he has the original… and the sealed version was not the original… is that sealed?
Who requested the seal?
I know the late Mr. Malone has seen a copy…
Obviously the courts could order it unsealed for their own edification.
Cue Mr. Takei … again.
Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog.
BS claims to have an accurate transcription of his conversation with EPWJ.
I don’t believe him.
who cares? So what?
The crazy bag lady that picks aluminum cans out of our dumpster says she’s the Queen of Sheeba. I’d believe her before I’d believe anything it said. If it told me it was raining, I’d walk down five flights of stairs to go outside and check.
In other news:
MD Code (Courts & Judicial Proceedings)
and yes, I know my HTML-fu is weak.
Hmmm… Maryland’s a two-party consent state, isn’t it? If he recorded the conversation without informing and getting the other party’s consent… well, just add it to his tab!
“The conversation went something like this” doesn’t suggest an accurate transcription to me.
Nor does it impute or imply such. 🙂
let’s all just remember it in his own words, he can’t be trusted to accurately report anything. He went so far as to say he would have third parties review anything that he wrote. What do you think the chances are that he actually abides by his own standard.
Maryland also is an all parties consent, if he has a transcript, and publishes it, then he has run afoul of the all parties consent wiretapping laws
5 years of three hots and a cot with all the man love it wants. Maybe that’s what he’s after? He is indigent, supposedly; I’m sure that’d be better than $10,000.
Somewhere, a Sea Hag has crossed fingers.
For the record
The conversation went like this:
Hello victim, This is a delusional unsold man also known as Free Cart
“I don’t want any books”
YOU MUST order my books
“Go away way away”
ANSWER THE QUESTION
Umm, no?
YOU DONT HAVE A NO CoNTACT ORDER SO ANSWER MY QUESTION
“bye”
SO YOU ADMIT TO CARRING OUT CRIMES AGAINST THE STATE?
“click”
Well, that’s just hearsay EPWJ. I’ll wait for Bil’s tapes.
I don’t know… I like how he left Twitter and the “trolls” and focused on his “comedy.”
Heh.
Dude really is a danger to himself and others. He can’t help himself.
He’s a menace.
More of an annoyance, Katie. Like a gnat. Or a carbuncle.
At least he has the common sense not to go begging his “friends” for help again. We’ve seen him humiliated by that several times. Begging for support, begging for someone to buy his crap, begging for even one review. Hey, with friends like that I wouldn’t be surprised to see them show up in court to laugh at him…..oh wait, Kimberlin already did that.