Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Brett Kimberlin is not a good listener. This exchange is from one of the bench conferences during the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. Judge Johnson was trying to explain to The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin about hearsay testimony from the Kimberlin daughter about things she did not witness.

THE COURT: — assume all of that is true, what does this 15-year old have to do with that?

MR. KIMBERLIN: Because she was harmed. She’s been harmed. She’s been run out of two schools and —

THE COURT: She’s not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: And they have defamed her. They have —

THE COURT: She’s not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: I know, but they have gone on her, she’s a very accomplished musician. They have gone on her websites. They have attacked reporters —

THE COURT: I don’t disagree with any of that, but she is not a party.

MR. KIMBERLIN: It’s not that she’s a party. They are using the pedophilia against me, against her and they’re doing it to harm me.

THE COURT: Sir, but you’ve got to understand something. We have rules here. You can’t just bring people in to just testify when they A, they didn’t witness anything that they’re competent to testify about and B, she is not a party to this lawsuit.

Judge Johnson seemed to care more for Miss Kimberlin that TDPK did.

THE COURT: But see what I’m trying to avoid is having this little girl come up here, objection sustained, objection sustained, objection sustained. And then having, putting her through that and having nothing really come of it. She can testify to —

TDPK put her on the stand any way, resulting in the following objections to questions or testimony that were not allowed by the rules of evidence.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: To him leading the witness, sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE WITNESS: And I know —
THE COURT: Objection is sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Overruled.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained. Counsel, sir, stop leading the witness.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Come up here.
[Bench Conference]
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Has your mom ever done anything hurtful to you? Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: By these defendants?
MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: I will sustain the objection in that this young lady is not a party to this case. She did not sue these men. Or you didn’t sue them in her name which would have to be the case. If a minor child is bringing the case it would have to be brought by her Next Best Friend who is generally the parent. She is not a party in this case.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — to have sleepovers —
MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — or come to the house or be around you —
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: — because of —
THE COURT: Absolutely hearsay.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: She can answer, overruled.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Hold on, anything else? No, you don’t just get to keep going. You have to ask another question.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained. Sir, you’re going way off base.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: You need to do whatever you need to do with admissible evidence pursuant to the rules of evidence and to the law. And I’ve allowed you some, I’ve given you a long leash.
MR. KIMBERLIN: You have and I appreciate it.
THE COURT: And let you run pretty far out there. But I’m now pulling you back in.

MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: Is it affecting —
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. KIMBERLIN: No further questions.

I cannot find the words to adequately express my disgust with someone who would needlessly inflict that on a child.

19 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


  1. If I was your attorney – after that exchange I would have somehow asked the court to look at his young daughter and remember that was the age when he first held down her mother and had sex with her….


    • What he said. People go on and on about how “reformed” he is but as we’ve seen in the state and federal case he is still forging documents and lying to the court. Reformed? I’m GLAD there are no sleepovers allowed at his house.


      • Every single murderer bomber rapist, forger, drug dealer, all say they are reformed when in a parole hearing or back in court – its actions that count not words.


      • Amen epwj! By their fruits, their very actions and life shall you know how reformed they are. Trust but verify. Perform the due diligence. In the course of said due diligence, it is revealed that Brett is not in the least reformed … although I will grant that he hasn’t built or set any bombs lately that we know of, nor has he donned disguises or acquired through forgery any military ID or eaten the Presidential Seal. He has developed other forms of attack through lies and intimidation.


      • Reformed would have meant an apology, some attempt to pay restitution, a change in behavior as one who has seem the errors of their ways. Not so with Brett Kimberlin. Not by a long shot.


    • You’re forgetting the important part . . . .

      Brett. Effing. Kimberlin.

      It’s always, somehow, inevitably about Brett Effing Kimberlin. Nobody else, noithing else of import other than . . . .

      Brett. Effing. Kimberlin.

      Doesn’t matter who e3lse gets harmed. Doesn’t matter what else someone is put through. Doesn’t matter how much time of other people is wasted, or how much money is spent supporting. protecting, and defending the malaprops and twisted worldviews of just one sad, miserable, narcissistic person . . .

      Brett.

      Effing.

      Kimberlin, Dammit!

      Now, can we get on to the important part?


    • Is this the “real” EPWJ? Normally that commenter capitalizes the name. And, it seems like not EPWJ’s style.


      • yes it was me the real EPWJ why I’m lower case because its my new wordpress account its overriding my Hoge account

        The style difference is that I’m on knew meds….


  2. new meds – feeling a bit dizzy they are making me hear voices – no wait that’s my conscious telling me to mow the lawn..


  3. I have several comments in moderation, but something fascinating is happening. Drudge, Daily Caller, and Legal Insurrection, among others, are reporting that about 10 people were responsible for the majority of online activity surrounding the #stoprush boycott. These people allegedly used automated programs to tweet thousands of tweets and emails at Rush advertisers. Some of the other people involved in some fashion, judging by their Twitter feeds, were Osborne and Karoli. A lot of this also reminds me of the vicious harassment campaign against Jeannette Runyon from the Free Kate contingent, including the creepy NicoleBonnet1. Are Neal’s fingerprints here, too? Also, what is it with these people and their cat obsessions? You have to read this guy’s tweets and his calm response to the hysteria on the left.
    https://twitter.com/brianglicklich/with_replies


  4. If Mrs Kimberlin was in fact in the Mid-West or Utah on the day in question, then, the Kimberlin daughter seems to have perjured herself when she said. “Mom is home packing.” If that was not true, I can see no reason for her to have uttered those words other than being coached to lie under oath.

Leave a Reply