The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin asked remarkably foolish questions during the trial for the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. Consider this exchange with Stacy McCain.
MR. KIMBERLIN: Do you tie me to Neal Rauhauser?
MR. MCCAIN: You’ve tied yourself to Neal Rauhauser. You told a Maryland court that he is your associate. He has claimed you as his client. Neal Rauhauser has represented your other —
MR. KIMBERLIN: Objection. That’s hearsay
MR. MCCAIN: I’m answering your question.
MR. OSTRONIC: Objection.
THE COURT: It’s your question, sir.
MR. KIMBERLIN: I know. But —
MR. MCCAIN: Can I answer the question?
THE COURT: Yes. You may.
MR. MCCAIN: Thank you. Okay. Neal Rauhauser, you stood in court and said that Neal Rauhauser is your associate. He’s attended multiple hearings where he was not a party that you were involved in. Neal Rauhauser has described you as his client. Neal Rauhauser represented himself as an agent of your nonprofit, Velvetrevolution.us. So he is your associate.
Comparing TDPK to Hamilton Burger would defame Hamilton Burger.