While We’re Waiting … Posted on 11 August, 2014 by wjjhoge … for the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. case to be called, I thought I’d share this bit from The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s answers to my interrogatories.I couldn’t make up something like that no matter how hard I tried. Share this:TwitterLinkedInEmailPrintLike this:Like Loading...
If you had something like that around the house, the kids might find it…
Oh cousin Roy that’s funny.
Only because it’s true…
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
I am certain your attorney can regale the jury with the relevant passages at trial.
His motion in limine I believe will aim to keep his bad reputation from becoming known in a trial about his reputation.
Is that even possible in a defamation case?
He can ask …
I hate to say it, but anything’s possible in the lawless courtrooms of Montgomery County, Maryland.
I have an opinion on that but just realized I was speculating about strategy and that’s probably still not cool.
Grasping at straws for a basis for potential appeal by a litigant who knows he is about to lose?
That would be original, if nothing else.
Nor does plaintiff have access to a public library, nor the $5 for a used copy…
Pretty weak sauce that, and it opens the door for the reading of some, or all, of the chapter in question into the record, without Brett Coleman Kimberlin, Pedophile Emeritus, being able to give testimony against any of it.
A poor strategy – he’d have been better off giving a proper response.
To me it seems like a basis for sanctions.
“..he’d have been better off giving a proper response.”
What could he possibly say?
Oh wait I forgot …. FALSE NARRATIVE!!!!!1!!!!11!!!!!
From no less than the authorized biography.
The trial is scheduled for two days, and there may be appeals, whatever the outcome. Best to refrain from commentary on particulars.
I suggest we go off topic. I understand that is a new tort. I am thinking about Chik-fil-a peach milkshakes.
Never had one. Are they good? Only available seasonally?
Surprisingly, pretty good. Not cloyingly sweet. Yes, available only seasonally, usually early summer.
When BS’s counterclaim gets tossed, I may have to commemorate with a chocolate milkshake.
I will hold a free bake sale.
Hardee’s down in VA used to have really nice seasonal peach shakes. Sadly, no one in New England seems to carry them. I will have to make my own; frozen or fresh peaches, vanilla ice cream, and milk in a blender. Mmmmm.
I initially read this as perch milkshakes. Did not sound good at all.
What, you don’t have a Bass-o-matic?!!? I’m sure it could handle perch too… (I’d try to find the video, but I’m on my phone.)
Which are amazing! I had one about a month ago, and it was glorious.
Years ago, over a summer, I had a contracting job that involved traveling up and down I-5 and I-84, out in western Washington and Oregon, visiting the customer’s sites, collecting requirements and auditing existing code.
My trusty crew of roaming programmers (a fun story in and of itself) was adamant about stopping any time we would pass the local Burgervilles, a fast food chain indigenous to the area, for their seasonal shakes. Raspberry, blackberry, marionberry, and peach shakes were each fantastically delicious, made by hand, one at a time, with hand scooped ice cream and fresh local fruit.
Probably packed on ten pounds that summer, just from those shakes.
Hi, Cousin Bill! Off-topic enough for ya, you mental midget? We’re off, drinking your milkshakes, while you’re stuck in that trailer, with just the shakes!
And fro-yo is a sad substitute for real ice cream…
Here in the ACC, we have Cook Out great fresh burgers and hand spun milkshakes. Tons of fresh fruit, but I like the PB&Choc with real ribbons of peanut butter.
Cook Out is pretty awesome. Any place that offers a smaller burger as a side item to go with your large burger is a-ok with me.
I have to agree with Roy about Burgerville’s milk shakes. (The burgers, sadly, have gone downhill over the past 20 years.)
Another good NW treat are the home-made (made-to-order) shakes at the Alpen Village in Startup. It’s on Hwy 2 about 30 miles east of Everett, Wash. Their rhubarb shakes… yum, yum.
In response to Cousin Roy’s comment, “And fro-yo is a sad substitute for real ice cream…”
It’s not if you’re having “quality time” with it. Besides, it’s not a substitute for ice cream. It’s kind of like a cold version of mayo.
Best cobbler in the west, folks.
Pingback: Brett Kimberlin vs. the Universe (Trial begins today). | Batshit Crazy News
“Plaintiff doesn’t have a copy of the book.”
Wait..Wait..BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA….Let me catch my breath…
That richer than hurting yourself picking up a candy wrapper.
It does sort of beg a follow-up question: “has plaintiff ever read the book? Or any other book? Perhaps the literary earth shakers Hunky Dunk or Undercover Trucker?
Hey, Paul, did you receive the packet I sent to your agent?
Should have arrived last week – lots of good background material in there…
Shall we just leave it at:
“Confidence is high.”
“Does not have a copy of the book” is hardly the same thing as “Hasn’t read.”
Can you even imagine someone writing an entire book where you were the subject without having read it?
Not unless a premature death is involved.
I know this isn’t fathead but it is similar….
Dear fathead. These are facts. Howard Earl is not Chris Heather. Howard Earl does not live in Wisconsin. However, keep libeling and defaming Chris Heather because you’re just digging yourself deeper in the hole here. Too bad you’re just too stupid to figure that out. Good day 🙂
Keep admitting you know right from wrong, fathead.
Ponder on this; http://cheeseskreist.com/time-for-chris-heather-to-lawyer-up/
(please wear protection on this link)
All nice and documented. You’re hanging yourself here and not smart enough to understand that.
Oh and that was nice of you of to change that domain back into your real name. You’re just not smart.
This sounds hilarious.
Sounds like a new chapter starting.
Indeed. He has no idea. It’s almost comical like
How many inconsistencies will BK be caught in Today?
Is say depends on how many questions he answers
JTMP – Just Take MEto Prison
DENY: Plaintiff has no answers.
Brett Kimberlin will be completely consistent: consistently crazy!
Just Terminate My Parole …
At first I was all…what? But then I was all, “LOL!”
JUST TRUST ME, PEOPLE!!
I say depends on how many questions he answered
Neal is having trouble remembering all his socks this morning..
Someone pleeeease screen cap my twitter feed I can’t from my remote location
BTW — The Deranged Cyberstalker and Adjudicated Harasser Bill Schmalfeldt is the most evil of all beasts! He’s asserting that “someone” SHOULD start spreading the lie that you are a pedophile.
“Someone SHOULD… ” Bill Schmalfeldt states!
NOT “What if someone… ” but someone SHOULD!
What kind of monster wishes that such a horrid LIE would be started in order to label an INNOCENT man as a heinous destroyer of children? Un-freaking-real.
EPWJ — Be sure to file this one safely away. I, too, have a screencap and the URL to the tweet in case it would *somehow* find itself memory-holed, and such a vicious and libelous assertion would possibly *somehow* surface in the future.
Bill Schmalfeldt’s evil knows no bounds.
I do this for others so they may prevail – he was certainly willing to start punishing me for my support of the innocent – may those use it to the full extent
Good so far – please keep praying for strength, guidance, comfort for Team Free Speech, for His Glory; and that God keep them all safe in His love.
Wait, so Bill thinks Brett is a thug?
Wow. We finally agree on something.
not completely off topic, more a tangent
but has anyone looked at Scribd lately?
wasn’t expecting to find THAT there…
search Paul Krendler….
that’s all i’m saying
That should Schmalfeldt up for once. Nothing more for dumbass to say about it.
Annnd now Bill confesses to starting rumors for injury
This is blatantly false. No one here is praying for this. BS is either lying or deluded or both.
once again Bwilly shows how completely screwed up his logic is…praying for someone to be held accountable for their own actions is the same as praying for a families destruction…
It is, however, time for a prayer:
Saint Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray;
and do Thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host –
by the Divine Power of God –
cast into hell, satan and all the evil spirits,
who roam throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls.
I love that one. Perfect.
The LORD, my protector, deserves praise–the one who trains my hands for battle, and my fingers for war.
That was cool! Here is a science experiment we used to do with a vacuum pump… they explain how water can boil in vacuum and then suddenly freeze.
I bet Julia Schyphers and those left behind felt destroyed. Carl Delong’s family might have some destruction to grieve. Brett is the destroyer.
Yes, definitely, Onlooker. Well done, pointing out what true destruction looks like – it looks like Brett Coleman Kimberlin from where I stand.
It seems clear that little Debbie had some other destruction, on top of losing her grandmother.
In addition to all of the other evidence, I don’t see how anyone looks at a man in his 40’s taking up with a 14 year old girl, marrying her when she’s barely 16, as anything other than pedophilia.
I believe that is what they call “the elephant in the room”.
I hear it’s done all the time in Inspector Jiggles’ part of Iowa. It can be the only POSSIBLE explanation.
TDPK is trying to compete with Hamas for using children as human shields.
Oh noes! Brett got his ass kicked again by a judge just a few days ago?
I have always found this verse to be quite comforting when facing a no-win or tough situation:
Exodus 14:14 “The Lord will fight for you while you keep silent.”
Sometimes its hard to stand still. But stand still and watch. God will not be mocked.
I played a game of Clue with my kids last night, I thought it was
In the tool shed
With the Sawzall
but it turned out to be
In the face
With a roundhouse kick
It was still fun.
Someone just sent me this, found on sovereignman.com. The last paragraph has the money quotes, and I think our host here exemplifies this mindset:
On September 9th, 1965, US Navy pilot James Stockdale was shot down over North Vietnam and seized by a mob. He would spend the next seven years in Hoa Lo Prison, the infamous “Hanoi Hilton”.
Jim Collins, author of the influential study of US businesses, ‘Good to Great’, interviewed Stockdale during his research for the book. How had he found the courage to survive those long, dark years ?
“I never lost faith in the end of the story,” replied Stockdale.
“I never doubted not only that I would get out, but also that I would prevail in the end and turn the experience into the defining moment of my life, which in retrospect, I would not trade.”
Finally, Collins went on to ask another question. Who didn’t make it out ?
“Oh, that’s easy,” replied Stockdale. “The optimists.” Collins was confused.
“The optimists. Oh, they were the ones who said, ‘We’re going to be out by Christmas.’ And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go. Then they’d say, ‘We’re going to be out by Easter.’ And Easter would come, and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving. And then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart.”
“This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end – which you can never afford to lose – with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.”
Collins calls that “The Stockdale Paradox” and it is mighty, indeed. Good to Great is a tremendous book.
Cannot recommend highly enough.
I think the Stranahans would ask BS the same question:
Briefly: Kimberlin chose them.
Ironic, isn’t it?
Funny how that works
Indeed, in the very moment Kimberlin decided to go after anyone who told the truth about his past, he chose them to hold him accountable.
He could’ve put on his big boy shorts and acknowledged that he had a sketchy past but was working towards a better future, but NO! he decided he didn’t want to do that. Instead he went on a full frontal attack against anyone who would dare write the truth about his past and anyone else who might be associated with those who wrote…
he made his bed, now he gets to lie in it…
With heavy emphasis on “lie.”
Curious question coming from a self-described “journalist”. They reported on Kimberlin’s past, in order that others would react appropriately to the life-long criminal. His lawsuit is a claim that matters of public record cannot be discussed if it is damaging to him. But he committed perjury; he planted bombs; he sold drugs; he bragged to a reporter about his attraction to underage girls. In fact, the most damaging facts come from HIS AUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY.
BS admits that he’s a “vile shmuck” for spreading vile lies about WJJH and the Stranahans, HAVING REPEATEDLY ACCUSED THEM OF CRIMES FOR WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN CONVICTED:
BS a short 4.5 months ago:
I see Bill Schmalfeldt choses to double down on lying. In fact, Brett Kimberlin was formally charged with third degree sexual assault, a crime that in most states would be named “statutory rape.”
Sounds like a diddler to me.
Here is God-loving BS again:
Tsk-tsk, William. Such hate! Don’t you have a life?
Now this one is a doozy. Remember the yowling from the usual suspects about the defendants possibly putting BK’s kids on the witness stand? GUESS WHO WANTS TO CALL HIS DAUGHTER AS A WITNESS?
Damn those wiley defendants..
forcing Brett to attack his own daughter like that..
will the RWNJ madness never end??
Yep. I’m sure I’m not the only one who saw this coming…
In Re Kimberlin v. Walker, et al.
on 7 August, 2014 at 13:36 said:
8 0 Rate This
Jane wrote: “I believe there is nothing he wouldn’t do to accomplish his goals… ”
Up to, and including, the sawed-off, domestic terrorist Brett Kimberlin using innocents as human shields in this diabolical circus of his own making.
There are other individuals in this situation who, too, need numerous prayers.
Brett Kimberlin is EVIL personified if he pulls what I’m thinking he’ll pull.
Pure, unadulterated evil. *spit*”
The sawed-off, domestic terrorist Brett Kimberlin is an evil, evil creature.
A monster disguised as a “Father.”
May God protect those innocent children, and keep and guard their hearts and minds.
The heart just breaks for them.
@ali is giving some details of this morning, too many to repost all: https://twitter.com/ali
Pray for the daughter that she understands who is really doing this to her.
Basically she has to get up there and call her child-bride mom a liar.
Which, how would that be dispositive in any way? People had a right to believe her.
Or not. Who knows what that hideous freak considers proof.
All the poor kid can really say is that she, herself, wasn’t molested. The math on her mother speaks for itself. 40’s + 14-16 = pedophile to many people
And let’s not forget the stuff in Singer’s book. “Grooming”. Making drug dealer associates “uncomfortable” with comments about little girls. Hey! Was Singer ever sued?
Actually, Sam, I think BK did sue Singer and the publishing house.
She’s already called her Mother an abuser.
The judge chose not to believe the claim.
“I will not go blow-by-blow as to what the teenage daughter testified to, but I will say that if you believed what she said, it was definitely abuse. I mean she alleged that once her mother spanked her so hard she was bruised to the point she couldn’t sit, that she couldn’t even walk. If you believe her, there is no question that it is abuse.
But the judge didn’t believe her. The story just wasn’t credible. I mean she was supposedly that badly harmed, and yet child protective services were not informed. In all frankness, listening to the recording, it sounded like the teenager was repeating a rehearsed answer. And if she was lying—and plainly the judge believed she was—this was almost certainly the result of Brett’s manipulation. “Just say these things and Mommy will leave her new boyfriend and come back to us and we’ll be a family again!” It’s not only common, but tediously so in family law cases. I mean, it’s another example of Brett’s vileness, but it’s a pedestrian one at that, which is almost certainly why Judge Burrell saw right through it: she’s probably seen it a dozen times.”
I don’t find any trace of Brett suing his publisher. It is my impression it didn’t happen, although in an interview I didn’t think to bookmark, he did complain about how the book turned out.
Oops – I see A Reader has already started posting. Maybe I can help:
So far, so good.
Is this man constitutionally incapable of uttering anything that is not false? Please note the lack of any screencap of an Ali tweet wherein he declares victory while at the trial, because there is no such tweet as of 1:06 pm EST
He thinks that reporting that things are going well is the same as declaring victory. No, just reporting that conditions look good to secure a victory.
Everyone involved knows that a jury is unpredicatable. John and Aaron, if I recall correctly, have both stated as much.
I wouldn’t even go that far – based on Ali’s tweets, I’d say only that the judge appears to be striving for equal application of the rules to all.
In fact, I see guarded optimism on one side, and the other side CERTAIN that BK will win…
Agree, A Reader #1 and Unknown Simian. We’ve been cautioned by #TeamFreeSpeech that litigation is unpredictable. We’re optimistic because we know the facts and law are on the side of #TeamFreeSpeech. But that’s a far cry from claiming absolute and immediate victory, as TeamEvil has been doing for at least weeks; and pretty much from the beginning.
At least TeamEvil is consistent in never letting facts get in the way of their projection.
Assuming Bill Schmalfeldt lies on principle grants Bill Schmalfeldt the false premise that he has any principles.
Indeed, all he has are double standards…
That’s a set-up if ever I saw one. Someone bring it home…
Time to quote Ken White perhaps?
Purposeful lying is purposeful.
According to Aaron, Judge asks BK if he was ever charged with rape,
QUICK TO THE TIMELINES – no pushing
I am reading your tweets. Dude, you are awesome!
EPWJ is a prince among men.
How do you get to read EPWJ’s timelines?
Click on EPWJ’s tweet, embedded in a comment below.
ACME Law senior partner WM “Elkridge Horror” “Lady Schmalfeldt” Schmalfeldt, any commentary on the absolute debacle occurring with your junior partner Brett “I’ll bomb ’em all” Kimberlin? Whatsa’ matter Billy Boi? Rat Kimberlin got your tongue?
Obviously, Ali and Aaron have a bias. They are tweeting as parties, not impartial observers, but it is fascinating anyway, isn’t it?
No good person could be neutral in this.
“…Louise Crosby [pseudonym for Julia Schypher’s daughter and the Barton girl’s aunt) testimony echoed the government’s favorite theme: Only a bad man would plant bombs and expose innocents to mortal harm, never mind the intent. An only a truly depraved soul —unpredictable, sinister beyond reason– would secrete evidence thousands of miles away, in a location and manner that compounded the original terror. [emphasis added]
Citizen K p. 174
“…rash of inexplicable bombings that terrorized his hometown of Indiana” Citizen K, jacket liner notes
“the town was terrorized out of its collective wits” p. 91
Terrorist gotta terrorize.
Diddlers gotta diddle.
I see that the 800lbs of FAIL in a 5lb sack is lurking and giving downtwinkles….
That all you got?
Ah, I see now…
Kimberlin is going to argue that because these passages are from the authorized biography, Mark Singer was “authorized” to defame Kimberlin.
But obviously Walker et al are not authorized, hence…lawsuit.
Because…say it with me now…HOGE!
The big DUMMY!
Are you Mark Levin?
GET OFF MY PHONE!!
“RetroIndy: The Speedway Bombings, Part 1
For a week in 1978, the Town of Speedway was terrorized by a serial bomber
“The point is, Hoge wrote on a SWORN MOTION that he does not allow off-topic comments.”
No, Commodore Cuckolded. Hoge stated he edits his comments. Not “does not allow off-topic comments”. I thought you were supposed to be a wordsmith or some such BULLSH*T!
You big dummy!
Jury seated. Opening statements are today. Trial tomorrow. No word on pre-trial motions.
what is THAT about?
If so… EPWJ was making the point that the Team Kimberlin harpies were tripping all over themselves on Twitter this morning with regard to the trial. They couldn’t tweet fast enough.
THEN… news broke via tweets (Ali and/or Aaron) that Judge Johnson asked the sawed-off, domestic terrorist Brett Kimberlin about his charge of statutory rape.
Team Kimberlin since then? Pretty much… *crickets*
IMO — The following is very much worth a re-read:
Breaking Kimberlin races breathlessly to Ukrainian Courtto file defamation charges against Judge – citing unfair use of Judicial authority and failure to notify Occupy WS’s Committee of Silence before disclosing facts in court.
Rectum? Damn near KILLTEM!
KU also reports court is in recess.
So, I’m guessing this is what that motion in limine was about:
Would you say what his tweets are saying? Some of us are not on Twitter and his feed is protected.
No opening arguments today. Whole trial will be tomorrow. The bomber will be allowed to testify.
Katie, any knews if the defendants will be able to impeach him as a perjurer?
I think so, per Stephen Sheiko, “If BK testimony allowed, defendants can impeach by introducing perjury conviction: Md Courts & Jud Proc § 10-905.”
Also, all his previous is allowed in.
gnus, not knews… sorry.
Omg! Judge strikes down court rules. Kimberlin to testify.
Best wishes for Team Free Speech.
Gee, William seems awfully quiet since the words “statutory rape charge” were uttered.
Could it be that the Crown Prince of Kablooey has played Oliver Wendell Jones for an idiot?
Just diaper change the nap nap time.
Convicted perjurer on the stand to testify. Will he perjure himself?
Hard to believe the judge allowed it, but then this whole case as well as the others, have been a serious education on what one can get away with in the courts.
Based on a motion that was not filed sufficiently early to allow the defendants time to file an opposition.
This is bothering me a good deal. Not much to support Kimby’s wish to testify in the law. Nothing really. MD law is not ambiguous on the point.
Charitably, it’s BS. Any 1L can tell you that the Constitution guarantees the right of a criminal defendant to testify on his own behalf. Not a civil plaintiff. Convicted perjurer Brett Kimberlin has had over a year to prepare this case for trial, and has known for most if not all of that time about his statutory disqualification under Md. Courts & Jud. Proc 9-104. If he couldn’t figure out how to make his case without his own inadmissible testimony, he shouldn’t have sued.
Oh well, worst case scenario:
Checking in on my lunch break – I see that the judge has decided to let Kimberlin testify. I can see why – this may be the only way to protect his daughter from being called. *Shudder*
It does also have the advantage of stopping him from attempting to appeal on the point, though it wouldn’t do him any good to do so, just waste time.
Agreed. Plenty of rope.
Kimberlin’s been punted more times in court than a 14 yr old Ukrainian FIFA game ball
This could actually be a good thing for team free speech. Now, the homegrown terrorist will have to answer some really tough questions while under oath. The lawyers in my family say he probably would be better off not taking the stand and just lose the trial. He may just get himself another perjury conviction out of this.
He should keep in mind he is still on parole.
..with a cherry on top.
you’re a bad bad man earl,,,,, that cost me a keyboard
The reason for the inexplicably voided rule will soon become clear to his Honor, I think.
And unlike “pretend” lawyers, actual lawyers deal in specific charges, actions and words. Some lucky lawyer is getting a free shot at a perjuring, forging, serial bombing felon under oath!
We all know how much an oath to tell the truth means to convicted perjurer Brett Kimberlin.
Isn’t it pleasant when Shakey shuts his pie-hole?
Hey Bill, when you talk to Brett tonight, tell him to give Chunk a call.