What the Words Actually Say

Posted on by

The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt™ says that the readers of this blog have great difficulty understanding what words actually say. Of course, sometimes the words are confusing.

The words that the Cabin Boy™ alleges that WordPress neglected to include in the DMCA takedown notice they forwarded to me list the following blog post as containing infringing material, http://hogewash.com/2014/06/20/in-re-schmalfeldt-v-hoge-5, and he describes that post as “It is a full page screencap of my copyrighted ‘Patriot-Ombudsman’ blog that I have since taken off line, but the copyright can clearly be seen at the bottom of the page. Used without permission.”

Here’s that post—

In Re Schmalfeldt v. Hoge

Originally posted on 20 June, 2014

On 19 June, 2014, the Maryland Court of Appeals denied Bill Schmalfeldt’s petition for a writ of certiorari. His appeal of the extension of the peace order will not be heard.

UPDATE—The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt™ has asked this question …wmsbroadcasting201406200144Z… and his question deserves an answer. The way that I’ll win the next “unwinnable” case is the same way I won the “unwinnable” peace order and the “unwinnable” peace order extension—by having the facts and the law on my side.

* * *

<sarc>Now, the words that the Cabin Boy™ claims to have included in his takedown notice clearly seem to say that the post contains a “full page screencap” from Patriot-Ombudsman, so the Gentle Reader’s confusion is understandable.</sarc>

UPDATE—Added the <sarc> tags.

80 thoughts on “What the Words Actually Say”


  1. Thank you for your concern, but I and my fellow “lickspittles” are not confused. We are not even confused that BS seems confused. He dumps so much nonsense through so many channels that is entirely reasonable that he does not know whether something he wrote as long ago as June was on a blog or twitter. Moreover he has proclaimed that his health is failing, and he probably believed that the only reason he could not see a copyright mark on his tweet is his failing vision.

    Reply ↓

  4. So, you quoted a tweet, and he caused all this fuss? What a Nincumpoop!
    How would you be able to refute the idiotic things he says without actually quoting the idiotic things he says?

    Reply ↓

    • copyright isn’t granted by an agency, but rather is innate to the creative process under our system of laws, and under our conception of property rights. If I wrote a book and someone hacked into my computer, stole it, and sold it as their own, they’d be in violation of copyright law, despite my not having done the same, and even if I had no intention of ever doing the same. I would not need to have submitted it to any agency, included the (c), or anything of the sort. They didn’t create it and thus have no rights to even one copy of it, much less thousands. Everything else is just about proving your claim as the true rights holder, as an impartial judge confronted with two people who both claim to be the originator of a work would require evidence to make a fair and reasonable judgment.

      Reply ↓

  12. Keep ’em coming, Hoge. Every one Screencapped. Every one shown to the judge to show how vexatious, vindictive and stupid you are, You’ve had it explained to you why your case us doomed to fail. But you’ve got that old Bunker Mentality going. The Russians are kicking in your doors and you are still predicting victory.

    Every defamatory comment written by lickspittles from this point on will cost you $1,000 in the settlement. Do you feel lucky? Well do ya? Punk?

    Reply ↓

    • “See, judge! These other people said mean things about me! That proves what a nasty guy HE is!!!!”

      Judges aren’t kindergarten teachers, Cabin Boy.

      Reply ↓

    • I guess this is technically a settlement offer of sorts. Groundless threats can be offers, right?

      Reply ↓

    • “Do you feel lucky? Well do ya? Punk?”
      Hmm. A line from “Dirty Harry” where Clint Eastwood is threatening someone with his .44 Magnum, IIRC. Interesting choice of words.

      Reply ↓

    • Dude, you are such a putz. You have no class or even a penny’s worth of common decency. You’re full of poison dude. Pray to God and ask for forgiveness…it’s not too late.

      Reply ↓

    • Doesn’t work that way moron. And you darned well know it. Go away or we shall taunt you a second time

      Reply ↓

    • BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

      Still barking out orders like a little yappy dog…

      You think you’re King Shyte but in reality you are nothing. NOTHING! LOL!! You keep thinking you are running the show, but in reality you’re a fat, worthless, scared-out-of-your-skivees old turd that controls NOTHING.

      A big old 800lb sack of fail. You scare no one… you intimidate no one. You suck at life… you suck as a human being… and you most certainly suck as a DOXmaster and pro se lawyer. Your understanding of law is laughably inept. Your whole life is one gigantic epic fail.

      And guess what, Admiral [REDACTED]? PROTECTED OPINION. People talk mean to you on the interwebs? Tough beans. Even though it is 1000% deserved… it isn’t ACTIONABLE. Keep chirping all you want about “defamation…” Don’t mean a damn thing.

      To quote Admiral James T. Kirk:

      I am laughing at the “superior intellect.”

      Reply ↓

    • I let one of Bill Schamalfeldt’s attempted comments through last night in order to show the unhinged approach he is taking to the copyright matters. It’s 7:13 am as I type this, and he has attempted to make 9 comments here at Hogewash! since 7:00 am. Any further attempted comments from him will be sent directly to the Trash folder.

      Reply ↓

      • Perhaps you could just forward them to Gail. Or maybe the Midnight Clerk at the State’s Attorney Public Affairs Office.

        Hate to see all that bile swirling the drain unremarked upon.

        Reply ↓

    • “Ahh, arrogance, and stupidy all in the same package. How efficient of you.”
      Londo Molari – Babylon5

      Reply ↓

    • the level of intelligence of a claimant has no bearing on the validity of the claim. Though your assertion of stupidity is demonstrability false, it is also irrelevant. If it were relevant to a judge, there wouldn’t be warning labels on coffee.

      Reply ↓

    • He is appalling. Doesn’t he understand that all his bluster looks like the spittle-spraying rantings of a delusional fool?

      Reply ↓

  14. Since the only post that i have ever taken down was the fundraising page for Mrs. Kimberlin, screencapping is a redundant exercise. Hogewash! does not memory hole posts.

    Reply ↓

  15. John – One never knows with certainty which way things will go in court, but I will say I’m disgusted you have to put up with the vile, pus-filled ulcer who is the Cabin Boy. His vileness is only exacerbated by idiots like Willy and X10, trolls with no lives, no decency, no purpose.
    Hang in there, kiddo. Whatever happens, the trolls still have only their sad, pathetic existence, lapping at the balls of BK.

    Reply ↓

  16. He can’t stop. He’s really a very sick person. A normal person would respect your request for no contact, and simply go about his business and win on the merits or press his case in legitimate settlement negotiations or wait for his settlement conference in hopes of some binding resolution. There isn’t any need to beat dead horses, but he just can’t stop.

    Reply ↓

  19. “This lack of self-awareness explains Schmalfeldt’s “double down” reaction to every conflict. No matter how clearly he is in the wrong, his fragile ego prevents him from backing away. Instead, he exaggerates (or creates from thin air) reasons to despise his antagonists, so that their wrongness, whether real or imagined, is always large enough in his mind to justify his sense of superiority.
    Schmalfeldt’s deliberate escalation of his conflict with John Hoge is the pluperfect example of this tendency. And yet now — some 11 months after the events that started the escalation — Schmalfeldt presents himself as the hero-martyr, the sufferer of injustice, and acts outraged that no one is buying into his victimhood claims.
    ****
    No one could ever pity Bill Schmalfeldt as much as he pities himself.”
    Robert Stacy McCain, http://theothermccain.com/2014/01/07/sociopathic-sadist-bill-schmalfeldt-vows-one-way-or-another-they-will-pay/

    Reply ↓

  22. “Without values or principles, Bill Schmalfeldt is intellectually adrift, blown to and fro by his own gale-force hatreds. So whenever any of his chosen enemies — Aaron Walker, Lee Stranahan, whoever — describes Schmalfeldt’s behavior, it is only a matter of time before Schmalfeldt begins to parrot his enemy’s rhetoric, falsely accusing them in the same terms they have used to accurately describe him.

    One can see this clearly in Schmalfeldt’s engagement with John Hoge….Hoge’s only interest in Schmalfeldt is to stop his harassment. Because harassment is Bill Schmalfeldt’s raison d’être, however, this illegal behavior persists….In “monkey-see, monkey-do” fashion, however, Schmalfeldt now routinely claims that Hoge is “obsessed” with him, and that he — the creepy kook Bill Schmalfeldt — is actually the victim of “harassment.”
    Amid this twisted knot of psychological projection and rhetorical mimicry, however, the real Bill Schmalfeldt is always present. And one of the most disturbing aspects of his personality is his frequent resort to language about feces, anal sodomy and coprophagy. He clearly has an abnormal fixation:
    [series of screen capped tweets]

    Robert Stacy McCain, http://theothermccain.com/2013/11/16/bill-schmalfeldt-obsessed-much/

    Reply ↓

  25. The Schmeldtdown tonight was epic in scope, and delightful to read, in a shmaltenfreude kinda way . ..

    Reply ↓

    • And it would appear to be continuing this morning as if there had been no break.

      I wonder how he’ll convince a judge or jury to add $1000 to his “settlement” for other people’s comments which have nothing to do with the copyright case. Or has butthurt become a valid claim under copyright law?

      Reply ↓

Leave a Reply