On 28 April, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin responded to my request for admission in discovery for the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. You can read his responses as Exhibit D-2 of my motion to dismiss his second amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. His responses are shot full of provable lies. For example—
Here’s what the judge had to say about the Kimberlin v. Allen lawsuit when he made his ruling at the end of the hearing.
That’s from page 109 of the transcript.
Here’s how TDPK responded to the next request for admission.
Object? Well, I guess TDPK is disappointed—and perhaps a bit embarrassed—that his suit for defamation suit seeking $2,250,000 in damages was found to be worth a hundred bucks. (Say, does that mean that his $1,000,000 suit would get discounted to $44.44?)
Brett Kimberlin isn’t a very smart liar.
UPDATE—My codefendants and I in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit are not commenting on discovery received from TDPK. The only exception is TDPK’s admission to me. Since those have been used an exhibit in my motion to dismiss in the RICO Madness, they are in a public document and fair game. We don’t intend to have anything to say the rest of the discovery provided until the court has ruled on any further pretrial motions or, perhaps, until after the trial.
Are these mendacious responses not considered perjury? And won’t there be serious consequences for it?
To actually get charged with perjury is a rare thing. Most people who cross the line get away with it.
It says a lot that this jackass already has a conviction and yet takes the process so unseriously. It says a lot about Maryland that he is able to, years after he tried to frame Aaron with provable lies.
If there is any justice, he will be sanctioned, he will declared vexatious, and he will even face consequences with his parole.
But if there was any justice with previous issues, he would be in prison today. Many lives would be in much better shape today had the justice system handled this guy well.
Many states only require interrogatories be verified under oath and not requests for admissions; however, attaching your signature to pleadings in most jurisdictions requires the signer be honest about the facts alleged (or else sanctions may be imposed).
Does the sun rise in the East, and set in the West?
DENY!!!!!!11!!!!Eleventy!!!!!!!
What was Kimberlin doing hanging around the Gaylord Center this March during CPAC? I just saw our host’s admissions page that BK returned.
As Ostronic notes, BK did not sign the response.
But he denies things that are clearly true. He denies that Mr. Hoge never assaulted him? Wow.
Purposeful lying is purposeful. It just continues the lawfare.
Its distressing.
Adding – BK has taken care to skirt averring truth in his pleadings and avoids signing, when he sign at all, with a clear statement that he understands he his signing under penalty of perjury.
He showed his hand about this passive aggressive crossing of the rules of procedure. He was shut down, of course, but he let it show that he doesn’t think he should have to sign under oath if he is not to be allowed to testify (on account of his perjury and Maryland’s law about that). QED he doesn’t have to promise to tell the truth about anything because he is “forbidden from testifying”. He’s not right in the head.
Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.
I can’t believe this crap is still going on.
Has B.K. Offered any settlements of any kind? Not saying you would agree, just curious.
What a waste of our court system.
Disregard my question.
The text didn’t show the first time past the PNG document.
Shot through with lies?
Quelle surprise!
Kimberlin’s cleverness is overwhelminng
14 year olds everywhere are one more step towards safety from at least one person soon
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz….
https://twitter.com/wmsbroadcasting/status/489083137016623104
A default on the claims; that’s all there was and the only reason he got anything. (Although in hindsight, it seems very likely to me that Brett only gained this much through fraud in service). The judge in so many words scolded him ,that telling the truth is not defamation, even if it makes Brett Kimberlin look bad when the truth is known. I told you he was mentally ill.
Whoops! BS is mad because someone is quoting him again! See Mike Malone’s blog.
How about that? The convicted perjurer perjures himself again. Here’s my shocked face…
Oops, sorry. Apparently I can’t lie as easily as Kimberlin does. 🙂
Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog.