Too bad that they have to remind the court that it has ignored the forgery matter. Nicely folded in to the rest of the response. It has only been four months.
Was language as forceful used before? I was gratified to have it pointed out that the clerk had refused to issue a Twitchy summons (and Brett Kimberlin’s inner forger decided to ” pro se” himself one with a little electronic white-out).
A legal question for other legal minds out there. TDPK has alleged damage to one of his money laundering businesses as a result of the RICO violation. But since the real party in interest isn’t a plaintiff, dismissal is proper.
Is there any way defendants could force the RPI to appear in this suit? I can’t think of anything offhand.
Mine, too. I did snicker at the “82-page fable” comment, as well.
This probably left a mark, too:
There is no way to read the SAC as alleging that Mrs. Malkin or Twitchy acted with the specific purpose to interfere with his foundation employment of his nebulous career as a “musician.”
Regarding the discovery countdown clock on this site, doesn’t TDPK have until 5 pm Eastern time to produce discovery? The clock seems to be counting down toward sometime in mid-morning instead.
About now, I suspect Kimberlin would love to find a way out of this lawsuit. I see nothing but negatives for him on the horizon. Michael Smith destroyed his SAC, and let’s face it, it was a pretty sad SAC to begin with.
Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.
That seems pretty solid.
Too bad that they have to remind the court that it has ignored the forgery matter. Nicely folded in to the rest of the response. It has only been four months.
Mornin’, Cousin Bill!
Sure was a fright last night, eh?
Learn anything? Anything at all?
Eh, didn’t figure you would.
Sincerely,
Roy G. Schmalfeldt
P.S. The spellchecker offers “scum” as a correction for “Schmalfeldt”. Thanks a lot, Bill! 🙁
Was language as forceful used before? I was gratified to have it pointed out that the clerk had refused to issue a Twitchy summons (and Brett Kimberlin’s inner forger decided to ” pro se” himself one with a little electronic white-out).
A legal question for other legal minds out there. TDPK has alleged damage to one of his money laundering businesses as a result of the RICO violation. But since the real party in interest isn’t a plaintiff, dismissal is proper.
Is there any way defendants could force the RPI to appear in this suit? I can’t think of anything offhand.
Oops, typo. I wrote “money laundering businesses” where I meant to write “non profit organization.” My bad.
spell check was right the first time – money laundering business
I had to laugh – “82 page fable..” There were some others but that one struck me as particularly funny.
“To call the allegations of count IX “boilerplate” is to insult boilerplate” was a personal favorite of mine.
Mine, too. I did snicker at the “82-page fable” comment, as well.
This probably left a mark, too:
There is no way to read the SAC as alleging that Mrs. Malkin or Twitchy acted with the specific purpose to interfere with his foundation employment of his nebulous career as a “musician.”
Ouch. LOL!
its completely inappropriate to refer to Brett’s complaint as a fable. Fables have morals at the end.
The moral is to not file vexatious, frivolous lawsuits.
That was brutal.
It also should have received a better proof-reading than it did, but that’s because my inner copy editor hasn’t come out to play for a while.
Wow, that is some argument. It will be fascinating to see how Kimberlin responds to it.
With more lunacy, no doubt.
MM cited some of the same authorities as Redstate, further evidence of the RICO enterprise!
Regarding the discovery countdown clock on this site, doesn’t TDPK have until 5 pm Eastern time to produce discovery? The clock seems to be counting down toward sometime in mid-morning instead.
The judge gave him until noon on the 10th.
Thanks, I had forgotten about that.
I that to mail it, or deliver it?
Deliver it.
To our lawyer.
I mean, was he supposed to file it with the court?
Discovery usually isn’t filed with the court. I don’t think the judge in this case required TDPK to file.
If he fails to produce the requested information, Hoge’s lawyer will file a motion.
About now, I suspect Kimberlin would love to find a way out of this lawsuit. I see nothing but negatives for him on the horizon. Michael Smith destroyed his SAC, and let’s face it, it was a pretty sad SAC to begin with.
I see what you did there. well played, sir.
personally, i do not relish talking about Brett’s SAC.
Pingback: ‘This Is How Bullies and Abusers Function. … They Will Stop at Nothing to Silence Their Victims’ : The Other McCain