Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

This is from the Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s opposition to my motion to dismiss in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.ECF 29-55_36

The obvious screwup is the paragraph numbering. That glitch occurs multiple times in the document, but the bigger problem for TDPK is in the paragraph numbered 36. (It’s actually the second paragraph 36.

The tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements: (1) the defendant must act intentionally or recklessly; (2) the defendant’s conduct must be extreme and outrageous; and (3) the conduct must be the cause (4) of severe emotional distress. While Kimberlin whines a lot in his multi-version complaint, he doesn’t allege with any specificity which defendants engaged in what conduct that cause him to suffer severe distress. Indeed, other than whining that he has a bad case of butthurt, he does nothing to establish that he suffered severe distress. The standard is quantified by the intensity, duration, and any physical manifestations of the distress. A lack of productivity or a mental disorder (documented by a mental health professional) is typically required, and, of course, TDPK has no evidence to back up such a claim.

#Whiner

26 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


  1. Incompetent whining sawed-off terrorist diddler. Not to put too fine a point on it.


  2. “TDPK has no evidence to back up such a claim.”

    Beg to differ. That dude’s entire life is evidence of being absolutely crazy.


  3. “he doesn’t allege with any specificity which defendants engaged in what conduct…” This. For basically every count, which is why the case will be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


    • In a perfect world perhaps. We are speaking of the Greenbelt Division of the federal court system in Maryland though, all is not as it appears in this mystery spot …


    • In the Maryland case, the Motions to Dismiss which were based on “failure to state a claim” were denied. I know: different case, different court with different rules, different judge. But the point remains. We can look at it and say, oh, this is just a bunch of butthurt, the court will throw out this trifling crap. But the judge may not.

      Judge Grimm has proven to be quite tolerant of a large amount of BS, abuse of his court, and flat out lying.

      As I said, after this judge denies the MTDs, that is the time to move for a mistrial.


      • I noticed this too. It seems the judge in the state trial has afforded BK the benefit of a doubt on every issue. I don’t trust her one bit to do the right thing.


  4. He’s a victim of small girls who have toyed with his emotions to the point of buying timers and black powder. He on the tax payers dole, vigilantly tried to turn his life around – got an older girl, got a job training people with songs about young girls. Now his fragile world has been turned upside down, throwing up some minor problems he had in his past, our brave victim, wiping away the running nose and teary eyes has lashed out against his tormentors who dared to defy him, who defiled and soiled his beautiful memories of fall days, football games and middle school lovelies, he decided to TAKE THEM ALL ON!.

    Struggling with a bride decades younger, small children who know no better and remind him of a goodness he still cannot achieve, he has parried and thrust, with these vapid d’Artagans who incredibly did not roll over and hired a posse of legal counsel, forced from his gravy train, huddled within the confines of a damp dark place, he is distracted, emotional and distraught. Certainly the good people of MAryland will realize the pain he has to go through, the fact he may have to “clock in” at his next career or get another stenciled jump suit is more than is required to meet all the elements of preteen emotional distress.


    • Heh. Is it perpetual toddler syndrome or perhaps offendluenza? Both are life-long afflictions that appear to strike those of a liberal mindset. Perhaps it is the mindset that is the affliction and the aforementioned are but symptoms?


  5. “Defendants Hoge and Walker callously argue that…”

    Callously argue? Did he really put that in a legal motion? Well, if his JTMP gravy train comes to an end he has a future writing very bad crime dramas.


    • “Nary a day goes by that Defendidents Hoge and Walker don’t breathlessly and callously argue that my felonies make me odious.”

      Remember the narrator in the Batman TV show? Or in the Underdog cartoon?


  6. Some bs from B.S. (caps in original. But you knew that):
    ” I LOVE THE FACT THAT ALL OF THE BOOKS WJJ HOGE AND ROBIN WESLEY CAUSEY HAVE FORCED AMAZON TO REMOVE FROM THEIR SERVICE WILL BE RIGHT BACK UP WHERE THEY BELONG ON JUNE 4, UNLESS HOGE AND CAUSEY DECIDE IT’S WORTH SPENDING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO SUE ME IN US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN A LAWSUIT THAT THEY CANNOT AND WILL NOT WIN!”

    Really? BK has spent “thousands of dollars” to sue KU? And here I thought he was pro se. Oh, you mean Mr. H. could do the same, and it would cost him no more than a filing fee? You don’t say! And Causey could file in Arizona, contrary to the assertions of an adjudicated harasser? And all it would cost him is a filing fee, too? Wow!


  7. Judge in case directs clerk to return letter from Bethany and the rest of the cool girls at Speedway Middle school, stating in essence, that Brett is on his own


  8. Looking at the original post, I think Federline can’t claim lack of productivity, since he’s more busy these days. He’s screwing it all up, but maybe that’s part of his strategy: “Your honor, look a how messed up I am? I can’t even mail out documents properly.” The guy’s a legal genius!


  9. I figured out the paragraph 55 and paragraph 36 numbering – its the difference in age between him and his wife

Leave a Reply