Here’s the other half of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s latest set of bizarre pleadings in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.
“Defendant Brett Kimberlin submits this motion in opposition to Defendant Twitchy’s Memorandum and stealth Motion to Dismiss.”
<mockery>Wow! Two really significant errors in the first sentence!
First, TDPK is supposed to be the plaintiff in this lawsuit.
Second, Twitchy isn’t a defendant in the lawsuit either. The court’s docket does not list Twitchy as a party because neither the original complaint nor the first amended complaint lists Twitchy in their captions.</mockery>
Last September, I wrote that Brett Kimberlin had made a terrible mistake by suing my four codefendants and me in the state Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. He
doubled tripled quadrupled down on stupid when he upped the ante and sued my twenty codefendants and me in the RICO Madness. If TDPK wanted to engage in shutuppery, the lawsuits were a bad idea.
He’s picked on people who are not easily intimidated. Indeed, several of us have pushed back not only in Circuit Court and U. S. District Court but also in the court of public opinion. TDPK as attempted to silence the defendants in the state suit via a motion for an unconstitutional preliminary injunction that would gag us and require that we take down all post since last July that so much as mention him.
Thus far, this motion has gone nowhere.
Brett Kimberlin needs to understand that his lawsuits are going to proceed in full public view and that by pursuing them he opens himself up to further scrutiny. He’s made his dirty linen the subject of inquiry. He should not be surprised when it is aired.
There’s a hearing on a motion to dismiss in the state case from Ali Akbar on this morning’s docket in Montgomery County Circuit Court. If Brett Kimberlin had half-an-ounce of sense, he would take that opportunity to simply withdraw the lawsuit. Really. He should cut his losses. Now.
But stupid is as stupid does.