I wouldn’t reproduce the admittedly obscene images the Cabin Boy™ posted of me because they are well beyond the standards for this website. However, I can’t post them even if I wished to. They were introduced into evidence during the 9 December, 2013, hearing on the extension of the peace order, and Judge Stansfield has sealed that portion of the evidence.
Given that the case file has been transferred, the only people who now have legal access to those images are the judges of the Maryland Court of Appeals.
BTW, I’m not kidding when I say that the Cabin Boy has admitted that he intended for the images to be obscene.
One more thing … the image Schmalfeldt is complaining about was posted in the comment section here at Hogewash!, and I took it down as soon as I became aware of it. It was well beyond the standards for this blog. OTOH, goose … gander.
Goose. Gander. Indeed.
He can dish it out, but he sure can’t take it.
Once again let me apologize for putting you in this position.
I don’t actually remember our host saying it was “ok.” In fact, the opposite. Mr. Schmalfeldt can whine all he wants, but there is NO comparison between the actions of Mr. Hoge, and the vile, obscene garbage Schmalfeldt puts out. Likewise, the judge agreed that Schmalfeldt’s pictures were harassment of Hoge.
Honestly. It’s like dealing with an 8 year old.
Exactly. Schmalfeldt (does feldt mean penis in Deutch?) generates this type of garbage on a routine basis; while our host tries to keep this place clean of such filth.
I must say that I appreciate that he is not a prude and permits a certain level of innuendo and ribaldry in the name of good humor.
Why do you insist on insulting all eight year olds?
Have you no shame?
Indeed, it’s more like the horrific threes (which have always seemed much worse than the “terrible twos” – I think whoever came up with that name didn’t actually have to ever deal with a three year old). That was the age at which a friend of mine’s kid threw a temper tantrum in the store when she didn’t get something, going as far as lying down on the floor and pounding her hands and feet. My friend had only ever seen that done in cartoons so she started laughing. Her child stopped and never did it again.
Good ol’ Unca BIwwy seems to be throwing the world’s longest-lasting most public temper tantrum; unfortunately he isn’t showing the wisdom of my friend’s child and ceasing when it doesn’t get the expected result.
Lg – did that with my brood, too!
Laughed and pointed at temper-tantrums.
Laughed at minor biffs. None of them knew you were supposed to cry when you hurt yourself…not until they went to preschool! 😉
Never, ever, ever rewarded bad behavior of any form.
Never let them off on anything because we were tired.
Punishment was immediate and appropriate to the offense.
Never let them play the missus and I against one another.
Told them never to lie to us, and that we would punish clumsy lies more severely than clever ones.
Know what? They’ve turned into six of the kindest, toughest, most honest and compassionate young adults you will ever meet.
What’s more, they’ve selected spouses that have similar traits.
And they call/text/visit me every day, so we did something right!
Suck it, Cuz.
LG –
As a kid I did this.
My mom says she was actually a bit concerned about my pounding my head as a toddler. Then one day I had a tantrum on the tile floor, hit my head once, looked up, looked around, and crawled over to the carpeting to continue the tantrum.
Somehow it never had the same effect since then.
My heavens the projection this man displays makes an IMAX pale. His machismo has got to be the result of either latent homosexual shame, or abject emasculation.
It’s okay to be gay Bill, God still loves you. If it’s the emasculation… well, C’est la Vie
He has confessed several times that he is a functional eunuch, meaning that he is impotent. See Wikipedia for the definitionS, plural, of eunuch.
FYI, for some, it is an unfortunate effect of PD. @buchananrick and BS have tweeted about this. BS suffers from severe sexual dysfunction, while Rick does not even though his PD is more advanced
The problem usually associated with PD is erectile dysfunction. IOW, you want to, but are unable. From what Bill has said (that he regularly experiences “morning erections”, which subside once he urinates), this doesn’t seem to be what is troubling him. He suffers from a total lack of libido, or desire for sex. He just isn’t interested. That is usually an indication of either low testosterone or severe depression. I’ve recommended he get this checked.
It’s probably because I am a member of the “married UP” club (blessed with a “Rule 5” wife, in looks and temperament) that I still want to, and can. As I said, it isn’t as acrobatic as it once was, but it’s still one of the things that make life worthwhile.
Thanks, Rick.
Having just read through some of The Elkridge Horror’s latest manifesto, I can assure those of you that have not read it – DON’T!!!
Clearly, in my opinion, this tome was penned by someone who most certainly is certifiably insane! He needs help now as his last stable connections with the civilized world are wilting away like the last smoke trails from a garbage fire. As I read the pages where he disparages his current wife who apparently is his only caretaker or the pages where his distorted sexual identity and feelings about his twin are exposed unnecessarily to all, I am overwhelmingly repulsed and disgusted by his words. Not only are they absolutely incoherent and void of logical thought and progression, they are rather disconnected as though he is under the effect of strong hallucinogenic drugs or other chemicals. What he is penning now is so bizarre as to defy description and should not be allowed on the general internet.
Mr. Hoge has again performed yeoman’s service to the citizens or Maryland and to humanity in general by getting this satanic frothing drivel off the internet and out of circulation. Clearly, if the Elkridge Horror had any real friends at all, they would quietly persuade him to check himself into the nearest facility for the criminally insane for extended care and treatment. That they do nothing stands in mute testimony to his value to them; something I fear he has known for months and has contributed to this all to obvious breakdown. He has become, in my opinion, a clear and present danger to those around him.
Previously, the Horror’s antics have been mildly entertaining, but today they crossed the threshold from “mildly entertaining” to “seriously or extremely disturbed” That those who have used him don’t raise a finger to help him shows just how cruel and degenerate they too have become, in my opinion.
Just sayin’
Tao: I didn’t read any of his “books” so can’t comment on those descriptions, of course. However, if you wouldn’t mind, I’d appreciate a bit more detail.
As for the bulk of your post, Tao, very, very well said/written. You hit the nail squarely on his fat head.
In his case he was just born that way.
I mean, he can no longer be Oedipal, right??
9 December 2013 not 2014
Thanks. Fixed it.
Shorter version: CBBS lies. But then again, this is the prevarication du jour.
I find it most curious that CB finds you responsible for what is posted by other people on Twitter and on your blog. Your perceived levels of mind control would put Spock to shame.
And these aren’t the droids you’re looking for.
Sounds like he applies his own situation to others.
http://hogewash.com/2014/04/30/prevarication-du-jour-92/#comment-39588
I find it disturbing that BS seems to have such vast knowledge regarding the sexual arousal of dogs.
And such little knowledge of Ballchinians.
Odd that he keeps blaming Betty for creating it.
And both my dogs are girls.
I’ve never seen Hoge lie. On the other hand, I’ve seen numerous Schmalfeldtian lies.
I’m sorry, but the word Schmalfeldtian covers too much ground. Does that mean projection, emotionally brittle, self pitying, irrational, off-putting, arrogant…??? I want him to be an internet adjective as much as the next guy, but we gotta get our terms right. Or is it a term meaning all of these, with an emphasis on how randomly they occur in a single statement.
As in: “I am a brave, strong journalist, yet not objective and if you make fun of me I’ll mention how I might suffer health issues because you are mean even though I am pretty mean because of you. Focus! And I never did those things you screencapped.”
…’and if you continue picking on me, I’ll find somebody to dox to spite you.’
“Because you pointed out the dumb thing I typed into my computer (just before I hit the publish button), I am going to try to find who you are, locate you and publish pictures of your children. And because I’m so much smarter that the Lickspittles, I will get the wrong family 9 times out of 10. Plus, I’ll call the cops. Because you mocked me on Twitter. Which can’t be harassment unless I say so.”
“…and if I dox the wrong person, it’s YOUR FAULT!”
Damned straight! LOL You’ve got the whole picture, PT.
how about its a name to describe the crusty crap that builds up between the chin and sack? As in… come here dear brother, let me wipe your ballchin, you’ve got schmalfedt building up back there again.
Sorry Johnny, that’s my down twinkle. Not inappropriate, just gross.
They couldn’t even fit it all in the DSM.
They would need to publish “The Schmalfeldtian Addendum, 950 pages …”
gonna have to squeeze in some shoeshine box and a dose of “t**t”
And also squeeze in a whole big lot of STUPID.
BS’s alleged PD must be acting up. Nine or ten tweets in 8 minutes. No typos. Poor thing.
I could just shed tears of joy! BS finally admits that WJJH is a strong leader!
https://twitter.com/PatOmbudsman/status/461591494290587648
Again with the projection to the point of abject role reversal. E.g. Hoge is a buffoon and CBBS a genius. Lickspittles are mindless drones but CBBS is an independent thinker. We are all socks, but it’s difficult to find parallel unconnected threads involving CBBS and his “Alies”. Hoge is a mean old curmudgeon, but Bill is ready for cannonization. Must I go on?
Hoge is a “doddering old fool” who is also a “strong leader.”. Heh.
Aaaagh! Cannonization! Death Threats agaisnt me!!
LOL. too mannny ennnssn
but a nice pun
Gus, I’d love to see him “cannonized”. The old 155mm “Long Tom” would be my choice of cannons …
oops, Twinkies book went all byebye again,…
MELTDOWN! MELTDOWN! WE HAVE A WARP CORE BREACH!
“Warped Bore Creep?” eh never mind.
Which one this time?
Would someone mind filling me in regarding the latest meltdown on CBBS’ twitter? There’s a bunch of disgusting crap that reads very much like Bill’s “writing” and one bit about Mr. Hoge. Then he goes off about how the proceeds *snerk* were to go to the PD people. (I’m reminded of the old matron’s trick of telling naughty children that their bad behavior had nullified the intended, but previously un-announced, treat to be given later).
“Well I was going to let you have ice cream, but since you’ve muddied the floors, there’ll be none!!”
Bill wrote a filthy obscene parody of WJJH and his family. Paul Krendler did a parody of the parody on his blog, Thinking Man’s Zombie. Paul posted BS’s parody on his blog after BS deleted the evidence from his own blog, just in case BS played the victim like he is now. It appears that Paul either assigned the rights to the parody to WJJH, or has asked WJJH to be his agent.
Or Cabin Boy is right and WJJH is Paul Krendler.
*snerk*
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!
Hey! They let you out of the cemetery!
Yeah, I’d have to see proof from the recipient before I’d ever believe CBBS gave anything to any real charity.
Somewhere in Howard County, the Popo are laughing so hard they’re trying not to pee their pants. Behold: “Hoge claims this is his property. He claims he owns this. I have shared this with law enforcement. Hoge may have handed me the evidence I need to put him someplace where he can’t hurt anyone any more.”
Bill always underestimates people and always gets humiliated because of it. You would think for once in his life that he would take a deep breath, step back and FOCUS! But no, he runs with the first thing that pops into his head. Just look back over his web history to see how well that worked out for him.
I routinely think that the comments posted on this site do little to advance any meaningful cause against the actions taken by Mr. Schmalfeldt, particularly comments regarding his weight, appearance, disability, and particularly his wife… the comments are often repugnant, rude, crude, and do little to address the more serious concerns people have about the man. Moreover, I think he likes the negative attention for the same reasons pigs like slop. Many times I have wanted to weigh in and caution those who comment on this blog that by lowering themselves into the mud – even if only to give equal treatment to Mr. Schmalfedt as what he dishes out to others – that they dirty themselves in the process and make themselves nearly as bad as the man they believe deserves such treatment. The old adage, “Don’t get down with a pig in the mud, you will only get dirty, and the pig likes it” is apropos.
Nevertheless, having seen the picture of Mr. Schmalfeldt with the testicles photo-shopped to his chin, I must say that I did laugh, almost to tears, because it was so absurd and quite frankly, funny – in a completely juvenile way. Mr. Hoge was right to take it down, it has no place here or in any sort of civilized debate regarding the man, but it was funny for the same reason that it would be funny on ANYONE’S face, including my own, in a completely juvenile way.
Now, if I were a Judge overseeing any case between Mr. Hoge and Mr. Schmalfeldt – with all due respect to Popehat and others who are rightly concerned with ANY kind of use of prior restraint on speech – I would order both sides to not mention the other, directly or indirectly, in any public forum and for any reason, for a period of two years. I wouldn’t care if it was unconstitutional, and I would enforce the Order with jailtime for every infraction. I know there would be less to talk about here, I think both sides would hate the Order, but I think it be justice for both sides and I would enforce it equally.
Kimberlin is a whole other matter. Frankly, I think light needs to continue to shine on that fellow…
I’m sure that if Mr. Hoge was told not to even mention Unca Biwwy, he and us durn Lickspittles could find plenty to chat about. Heck, we had a small thread on capybaras and large bear statues holding drink trays earlier today on Twitter. If Biwwy hadn’t gone and said even more stupid stuff about us, I’m sure we would have kept going. Or perhaps a long discussion of Carrington events and what we think would happen to us if one were to happen tomorrow.
I think Unca Biwwy (and he called himself that first) would find an order not to even mention Mr. Hoge infinitely more intolerable than Mr. Hoge and his commenters would find not mentioning him.
Correct, except for the part of not mentioning each other – Bill is 100% correct in being allowed to talk about Hoge, except in a defamatory fashion, which he is unable to do, but the comments are out of line, but people’s patience with his harassment has worn thin, very thin
Speaking of TDPK, I heard what is probably his favorite song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR2JtsVumFA&feature=kp
Listen to the words carefully……
Nice try Neal. D- grade …
nope.
“I would order both sides to not mention the other, directly or indirectly, in any public forum and for any reason, for a period of two years. I wouldn’t care if it was unconstitutional,”
Why?
Because the anti- United States Constitution asshat belongs in the comments section of CBBS’s cesspool of a blog.
“…photoshop dog nuts onto my face…”
Which would only make the dog nuts look respectable…
Photoshopping “doughnuts onto his face”, on the other hand, would probably be closer to the truth.
Cabin Boy really needs an editor. First he publishes, in it’s entirety, a blog post from another author and then dismisses the change of a copyright claim (how’s THAT working for ya Bill?) with this line “You can see it for yourself here. I doubt he will try to sue me for copyright, since he would have to review his actual name.”
Several pages later he says thing, “Therefore, this book will use no material that can be
claimed as “copyrighted” by anyone – except by the author.”
He can’t even keep his lies straight when he writes them down.
By the way Cabin Boy, you forgot to tell your readers that that blog post you found so vile was a direct parody of one you previously wrote. Why didn’t you want your readers to know it was a response?
I read the parody. I understood it as such. I know why it was written (because of what Mr. Schmalfeldt wrote about Mr. Hoge). I get what the author was doing, but it was the perfect example of lowering discourse for the sake of the author saying, “See what YOU are doing to others,” to Mr. Schmalfeldt. That said, the message is clearly lost on the intended subject. In the mean time, he gets to whine about being bullied and the awful things being written by him by Mr. Hoge’s supporters… In the end, what does it accomplish to further the discourse? Schmalfeldt completely misses the point but can show the article to those on the left and say, “see how I am being bullied.” It makes no sense to me why someone does that.
I also don’t get bullyville. They have a website where they “expose” bullies to online ridicule, public embarassment, and perhaps loss of jobs, income, etc. (if I understand the site properly). How is bullying bullies in this way justified? I know the site owner has suffered at the hands of some creepy people, but I fail to see how that site is different than the people it targets. Am I missing something?
Yes. The concept of giving a bully a dose of their own medicine. You’re too soft, unwilling to do as is right and just, only what you perceive as “fair”.
#FAIL
Esodia wrote: “Now, if I were a Judge overseeing any case between Mr. Hoge and Mr. Schmalfeldt – with all due respect to Popehat and others who are rightly concerned with ANY kind of use of prior restraint on speech – I would order both sides to not mention the other, directly or indirectly, in any public forum and for any reason, for a period of two years. I wouldn’t care if it was unconstitutional, and I would enforce the Order with jailtime for every infraction. I know there would be less to talk about here, I think both sides would hate the Order, but I think it be justice for both sides and I would enforce it equally.”
I think you’re high on meth and could NOT be MORE wrong.
ESODIA: “I WOULDN’T CARE IF IT WAS UNCONSITUTIONAL…”
Anti- First Amendment, much? Go scratch.
Sometimes the constitution is wrong and sometimes interpretations of the constitution are wrong and sometimes, under extremely limited circumstances, prior restraint makes sense – such as in cases of harassment, or protective orders, where one side is told not to have any contact with the other. I think, in this case, both sides are contacting the other by reading each other’s public comments and responding to them. It is straight up dialogue between the two. I understand there is currently no Order against Mr. Hoge, but you cannot carry on a conversation with a person and yell foul everytime they open their mouth. It really is a two way street – at least if you want prosecutors to take violations seriously. What I would do, as a judge, is (between the parties) tell both sides no contact with the other, period, to include public conversation about the other.
I like Hoge, I read his blog daily. I don’t like the comments I read here, to the extent that they stoop the team kimberlin level. I’m not saying they are the same level, but there is certainly a lowered level of discourse.
Nope, understand that freedom exists for all, or that it exists for none.
I support both Professor Hoge’s freedom of speech, and Cousin Bill’s freedom of speech.
The solution to “bad” speech is more speech, not less.
The solution to verbal harassment (speaking *to* someone, not speaking *about* someone) is *not* to restrict everyone’s speech.
Blah. Blah. Blah.
ESODIA stated: “I WOULDN’T CARE IF IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL…”
Again… GO SCRATCH! Don’t like the United States Constitution and our Bill of Rights? Too freaking bad. Work to amend… NOT pervert and twist and trump.
You, and your like-minded ilk, are precisely why, as a Republic, we can’t have nice things. *SPIT*
[airhorn] Concern troll identified!
It sounds like @harada_no_hime.
Paul H. Lemeon wrote: “Yes. The concept of giving a bully a dose of their own medicine. You’re too soft, unwilling to do as is right and just, only what you perceive as “fair”.
#FAIL”
Annnnd, Esodia brings up Bullyville… curious that. *hmm*
No at all, for a concern troll.
Guess I will just go back to reading instead of commenting.
Nice to know I am unconstitutional asshat and possibly a team kimberlin plant, and a troll, for suggesting people not result to doing the things they complain about other people doing.
Nobody here doxes people, including children, torments grieving parents, etc., etc.
Esodia wrote: “… I wouldn’t care if it was unconstitutional, and I would enforce the Order with jailtime for every infraction…”
Those are your words wherein you flatly state that you would not only order unconstitutional restriction of speech you don’t like but would also incarcerate offenders of your delicate sensibilities. And you have the audacity to complain because someone referred to you as unconstitutional? Seriously?
You come here (at best) telling us all that we’re ‘doing it wrong’ or at least not up to your standards, in multiple posts. Did you expect warm and fuzzy accolades? Seriously?
And really, you implicitly assert, you only mean to ‘help’ us with your criticisms, and you don’t think that implies even a whiff of concern trolling? Seriously?
Surely someone as clearly erudite as yourself can look over your posts and see how they may appear to others. Or can you? If you didn’t have a clue how your posts would be received here, well, maybe there are some other things you should reconsider.
Heh. Like breathing …
Jane wrote: …
Perfectly stated, Jane… from beginning to end.
Jane said, “Those are your words wherein you flatly state that you would not only order unconstitutional restriction of speech you don’t like but would also incarcerate offenders of your delicate sensibilities. And you have the audacity to complain because someone referred to you as unconstitutional? Seriously?”
No, what I said was that I wouldn’t care if it was unconstitutional, I didn’t admit nor suggest that it actually would be an unconstitutional order. Further, I did not say that it would be any speech which offends by delicate sensibilities. I actually suggested a blanket prohibition against speech by one person, about another person, for a limited time period. The Order is far more expansive than the language typically used in protective Orders and was suggested BECAUSE the individuals in question continue to dialogue, but do so through public electronic mediums. The ONLY reason, if I were a Judge, that I would make it a two way street is because BOTH sides continue the dialogue despite one or both sides claiming to just want to be left alone. I ‘m NOT suggesting Hoge was wrong first, but I do that that a person who keep poking a bees next should not be surprised when they swarm him – even if the bees are completely incompetent.
You are right that I should not expect warm and fuzzy accolades for having an unpopular opinion. Despite being a relatively smart guy, I had to look up the words, “concern troll” and erudite. I am not a concern troll, because I actually do support Hoge – which, admittedly, is exactly what you would expect a concern troll to say. I’m not trying to troll, I genuinely think people can talk about Shmalfeldt, ripping his positions to shreds, without petty personal comments about his appearance, wife, etc. Hoge doesn’t typically do these things, but the peanut gallery does… often. I appreciate having been called erudite, its better than asshat, I suppose.
My posts were not targeted to offend, I really was trying to get people to raise the level of their criticisms of Schmalfeldt above petty school yard bullying. Who am I to suggest that of others, nobody, clearly. I just don’t see the wisdom of becoming a bully to fight bullies – becoming the thing you profess to hate, in order to fight the thing you hate, is illogical and reeks of hypocrisy.