Prevarication Du Jour

The Cabin Boy’s™ claims that he no longer had access to his liberalgrouch.com email account after September, 2012.PBT210403291332Z

On 6 December, 2012, Schmalfeldt published a post entitled While Stranahan Offers Rewards for Imaginary Threats, We File Complaint for Real Internet Crime. As of last night, the post was still up at Breitbart Unmasked (No, I won’t link to it) (H/T, @stephensheiko). That post contains this:BU20121206

#Liar

UPDATE—Lest the Gentle Reader think the Cabin Boy™ simply made a typo once on 6 December, he included the same sentence in a post called While Stranahan Offers Rewards for Imaginary Threats, We File Complaint for Real Internet Crime the next day. Oh, and don’t think that the second occurrence was a matter of cut-and-paste. He also published the following in a post called Take Heart, Fools! Stranahan is Spending Your Money WISELY on the 7th:BU20121207

#StupidIsAsStupidDoes

UPDATE 2—StephenSheiko201403311104ZHeh.

UPDATE 3—The Cabin Boy™ is still trying to claim that he wasn’t using the account past mid September.PBT201403311052ZNow, it may be true that his “friends” can’t find any of his emails, but suppose that one or more of his ex-friends kept such emails.

From: [redacted]
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:28 AM
To: The Liberal Grouch <editor@liberalgrouch.com>
Subject: Re: question

Copy …
[redacted]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:27 AM,The Liberal Grouch <editor@liberalgrouch.com> wrote:
Stand by.

From: [redacted]
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:23 AM
To: Old Liberal Grouch Account <editor@liberalgrouch.c= om>
Subject: question

Bill;
How can I register for a login at the Patriot-Ombudsman?

[redacted]

#StopDigging

UPDATE 4—Mmmmm. Trader Joe’s Caramel Popcorn for breakfast.

UPDATE 5—Last, but not least, it should not be surprising that some of Schmalfeldt’s adversaries have saved emails. Note the date.

Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:24:48 -0400
Subject: On the subject of swatting,
From: Bill Schmalfeldt <editor@theliberalgrouch.com>
To: Aaron Worthing <[redacted]@gmail.com>
CC: “Tae H. Kim” <thkim@attorneytaekim.com>

Mr. Walker.

I believe a judge has thrown out the case where I was accused of sending a swatting message. Therefore, there is no evidence I have swatted anyone, and I am telling you I have never swatted anyone. If you value your meager possessions, you will henceforth refrain from saying, suggesting, inferring or intimating that I have ever been directly or indirectly responsible for swatting anyone. I am sending a copy of this notice to my attorney ,Mr. Tae Kim, who ate your lunch in Howard County recently as you will recall.

I have never swatted anyone, have never been involved in the swatting of anyone, and have never had foreknowledge of anyone’s impending swatting. Your next inference that I have been responsible for such reprehensible behavior had better be accompanied by proof, or you will be considered to have willfully, with malice and forethought, libeled me in a public place.

Do we understand each other? In fact, I believe I insist on an apology and a statement that you have no knowledge that I have ever been involved in swattinganyone. Pleaseensurethatthisapologyissenttomeviae-mail, with a copy to Mr. Kim, and is posted publicly on Twitter.

Thank you. https://twitter.com/AaronWorthing/status/325410494141845504 Bill Schmalfeldt

Copy to Tae Kim

UPDATE 6—Of course, the email to Aaron Walker is from THEliberalgrouch.com rather than just plain liberalgrouch.com—another example of the Cabin Boy’s™ multiple (Internet) personality disorder. BTW, it appears that Schmalfeldt wants to surplus that domain.LG4SaleHowever, that’s not the case. The domain is now owned by a cybersquatter.

54 thoughts on “Prevarication Du Jour


  1. Looks like I picked a bad day to go to work.

    The dancing and backpedaling should be interesting.


    • We’ll update you later … make sure to pick up some popcorn and beverages, you’ll need them!


  2. And Willy didn’t notice that all the examples of the email and domain yesterday, none of them contained “the”.

    Odd that.


  3. How about this:
    Delivered-To: [redacted] Received: by 10.49.131.39 with SMTP id oj7csp17492qeb; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.28.14 with SMTP id k14mr10672381qac.72.1348763330047; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from imta-38.everyone.net (imta-35.everyone.net. [216.200.145.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p18si1453187qct.17.2012.09.27.09.28.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.200.145.35 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of editor@liberalgrouch.com) client-ip=216.200.145.35; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 216.200.145.35 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of editor@liberalgrouch.com) smtp.mail=editor@liberalgrouch.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0004961 [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q8RGSQ8B002952 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:28:48 -0700 X-Eon-Dm: dm0201 Received: by dm0201.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2[SSL] – 44365656) id dm0201.50523420.2aa7e35 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:28:43 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQOhDLVQZH67+F+YeAIAAAAB,d0360589914517fc7c1a89cf15a4a485 X-Originating-Ip: 68.54.86.86 From: Old Liberal Grouch Account Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=”Apple-Mail=_D3BCE50B-4C2A-4842-8B3C-D1E0D8F575EB” Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\)) Subject: Re: Henderson Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:28:42 -0400 References: To: [redacted] In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-27_06:2012-09-27,2012-09-27,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1209270178 –Apple-Mail=_D3BCE50B-4C2A-4842-8B3C-D1E0D8F575EB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I appreciate the effort. I already have most of these, but the more the = merrier! On Sep 27, 2012, at 12:25 PM, [redacted] wrote: > Here are some screen-shots from around the web showing Henderson as Senior Counsel for ACLJ as well as Adjunct Professor at Regent University Law School … > –20 > [redacted] –Apple-Mail=_D3BCE50B-4C2A-4842-8B3C-D1E0D8F575EB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I appreciate the effort. I already have most of these, but the more the merrier!

    On Sep 27, 2012, at 12:25 PM, [redacted] wrote:

    > Here are some screen-shots from around the web showing Henderson as Senior Counsel for ACLJ as well as Adjunct Professor at Regent University Law School …
    > —
    > [redacted]
    >

    –Apple-Mail=_D3BCE50B-4C2A-4842-8B3C-D1E0D8F575EB–


  4. Bill Schmalfeldt @ParkyBillTweets

    What’s it like, doggy, to be such a dimwit that you automatically believe whatever Hoge lies about? pic.twitter.com/5nQcgc7tob

    And it doesn’t matter, because I am not the one who made false statements under penalty of perjury. See Hoge’s difficulty here yet?

    None of my friends can find a “editor@liberalgrouch.com” e-mail after Sept. 16. Sorry. I just did not use that address afterwards.

    Now, ask yourself. Who has the bigger worries? Me, who mistyped my e-mail address? Or Hoge with the possibility of felony charges?

    Not #liar simple #typo. Nice search, though. I still had editor@theliberalgrouch.com and sometime forgot to add “the”

    Annd we are starting off the morning here a W-support-a-bomber with our morning drive by host Bill even though he is clapping his hands has managing through his magic typewriter to push an astonishing amount of links, page attachments, and words in a 4 minute burst of 120 words in 240 seconds

    that’s write? 2 page attachments,4 twitter screeds in under 4 minutes all the time our Bill – in the final stages of a disease that he has bravely battled for a decade and a half – he still manages to get up the energy to defend the honor of one of America’s most heinous and remorseless criminals

    A profile in courage – using any means necessary (and I mean any) to defend this serial bomber from being interfered with


    • “interfered with” by telling the truth about him… by stating legally adjudicated facts about his crimes…


    • Now even more its beyond satire 4 more twitter and a BLOG post with screen grabs in less than 6 minutes over several hundred words –

      How does he manage to do it?


      • Another blog post and more tweets. That’s some high octane speech recognition software he’s working with.

        BTW, can someone point out that he can’t ‘order’ anything? That’s up to a judge. He can however ‘request’ or even ‘demand’ that someone cease and desist. And similarly, a random internet post means not much. Doesn’t he have to go through a specified third party?

        I mean, really, six ‘cease and desist’ requests? Any person who wasn’t a dimple skull would have asked for a restraining order or filed suit after two or three.

        This is getting almost sad and stupid enough to not be popcorn worthy. Almost.


      • I’m sure the PR flack is getting tired of his 3 daily emails too

        “FACT: All e-mails I receive, all comments I get are sent immediately — with headers — to the Howard County State’s Attorney’s office, Circuit Court Division.”


      • Last reply got eaten? (If they both show up, please feel free to delete one of them)

        I love how he has a “cease and desist” letter, (to a man he can’t legally contact, so how can he legally assume it is being received?) ordering the subject to stop writing “libelous” things about him, while the post right below it accuses Mr. Hoge of extortion, or at least that’s how I take the “Is Hoge gonna EXTORT me again?” line. Isn’t accusing someone of a crime libel per se, requiring no damages for the writer to be found guilty?


      • I should clarify for Biwwy when he reads this that by saying “Is Hoge gonna extort me again?” the normal reader will infer that he is claiming that Mr. Hoge has committed at least one previous instance of extortion. Therefore the post is accusing Mr. Hoge of being an extortioner. Which I believe meets the definition of a libel per se claim.


    • INAL, but I’m smarter than ACME, and I have to wonder. Suppose that B.S. is actually correct in that he didn’t have access to the e-mail address at that time in question (maybe his unicorn was using it–hey, it’s make believe land so reality doesn’t apply). Given that he typed that it *was* his e-mail address, how exactly does he think he could get a perjury charge for Hoge believing his statements?


    • Playing cards requires “brains” that Fatboi does not possess. I guess that’s why he threw in the checkers comment, because that’s all he knows. Dude is as smart as a “bag of doorknobs!”


    • but, but, it was that dam lawyers fault, related to someone, and the judge, he doesnt know twatter… errrr yeah, thats it.


    • Yes, don’t you fools know he’s not scared by threats of legal action?

      You need pictures of Play-Doh dolls and hand tools to really force a new set of Depends on him!


  5. RE: UPDATE 5, there’s that stupid phrase again <i? with malice and forethought. What a stupid fellow! Dear Mr. Asshat; it’s with malice aforethought, a completely different animal and a legally defined term. If you seek to threaten, do so properly.
    What an idiot!


    • Crap! hit the wrong key again. I didn’t properly close my tag again! <i? with malice and forethought should be with malice and forethought.


  6. I wonder what the SSA IG’s office is going to do with their copies of all these posts by Carbuncle, under various account names, coupled with the timelines where it proves conclusively that he is almost always typing at speeds well above the minimum required by his job description? It appears that Carbuncle Bill (known as CB) has apparently been defrauding the government for quite some time! I wonder what monies Carbuncle Bill has received from his friend TDPK’s various foundations for services rendered and somehow neglected to declare it as income. I imagine that the IRS will take a dim view of CB’s “forgetfulness”. In a like manner, I understand that the State of Maryland will take an even dimmer view of Bill’s “forgetfulness” with view to his tax return situation.


  7. The weather forecast for my area called for partly cloudy in the upper 50s. So I didn’t bring an umbrella to work. Imgine my surprise when I got out of the car and found it raining popcorn & butthurt.

    You couldn’t warn a guy?


    • Looks like “Mr. Ass Man” wasn’t doing it on purpose, he just decided this would be a great day to change his handle. OH SERENDIPITY!


      • I can’t remember what his handle was when I first read his tweet in Bill’s TL, but it was tame. Then I go back aaaaand “Mr. Ass Play”!

        You just can’t make this stuff up. What a world.


      • I’m pretty sure it was “Backscatter”.

        I love how just like Unca Biwwy, he calls anyone who he disagrees with/doesn’t like a “troll”. I do not think that word means what he thinks it means.


  8. Hints that it’s safe to ignore a legal threat:

    1 – the sender forwards a copy of the threat to his ex-lawyer, who is not under retainer and doesn’t care, instead of having an attorney write the threat for him.

    2 – the sender makes a malapropism like the one Mr. Lemmen pointed out, in place of a basic legal term. (I’ve seen “malice of forethought” before, but CB’s is even dumber.)

    3 – the sender, who claims to be a professional writer, continually misuses “infer” and “imply” – simple English words.

    you will henceforth refrain from saying, suggesting, inferring or intimating that I have ever been directly or indirectly responsible for swatting anyone

    Uh Bill, I can choose to refrain from speaking, suggesting and intimating. Those are voluntary actions which are under my control. You cannot, however, ask me not to infer something, any more than you could demand that I not conclude you are a semi-literate cretin after reading your prose. These are automatic, involuntary, natural responses, over which I have no say. It’s like asking me to believe that your PD is as bad as.you pretend. Just can’t do it!

    In my spam fighting days, I received literally hundreds of bogus legal threats. My response to most was the same – “Have your lawyer contact me. Lets get those billable hours rolling.”

    That usually shut them up.


  9. fyi i’ll be opening my new, invite only site for lickspittles only (no Twinkies) this week. Where we can ‘defame’ and ‘libel’ Cabin Boi w/out him knowing about it. First posts will be fresh pictures of a certain trailer park, a vehicle (including license plate), and some google map directions of a field trip I took last weekend.

    Hang on for invite request details.

Leave a Reply