#BrettKimberlin Admits Forgery


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has filed his answer to the show cause order concerning the forged summons received by Twitchy.

In paragraph 3 he admits to altering a summons and sending it to Twitchy.

UPDATE—Aaron Walker comments here.

191 thoughts on “#BrettKimberlin Admits Forgery

  1. Wow.

    I would not expect a judge to buy it, but considering….

    Who knows?

    Also, i note there are no deviations as to form on this document. The verification is correctly phrased, and he put his name, number, email address there.

    • For me, the “Wow” part is Brett Kimberlin’s utter indifference to the possibility of being jailed. IANALTG, and I may be wrong, but I suspect that most represented clients would not swear to having altered an official document and knowingly sending it in the mail.

  2. I didn’t believe Mr Brett “jail house lawyer” Kimberlin actually had the balls to claim ignorance of the process to try to wiggle out of sanctions for his attempted forgery, but apparently he did…

    O.o

  3. Well, it seems Michael Smith saw this coming.

    Mr. Kimberlin’s Response is completely silent as to the forged summons. It offers this Court no explanation, no evidence to counter the Julie Israelson Declaration and attachments, R.41 Memorandum & Ex. B, and no discussion of why some lesser sanction than dismissal would be appropriate. Perhaps Mr. Kimberlin’s upcoming response to the Court’s show-cause order will, though to the extent it will rely on a) his pro-se status and b) a claim of inadvertent mistake, neither holds water.

    Apparently, neither the apology nor the excuse is accepted.

  4. The mind reels. Think about this for a moment: Twitchy’s attorney has access to legal databases, which contain the entire history of litigation in federal district courts in this country, among other things. They contain all state cases. How many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of state, federal, local, and administrative cases is that? Yet, he was unable to find a single solitary case in 200 years of another “pro se plaintiff” making this mistake, let alone one who is a paralegal, an experienced pro se litigant, and jailhouse lawyer who admitted to filing over 100 cases.

  5. Someone needs to point out to the judge that he is a paralegal, bragged about how many court cases he has filed etc. Hopefully the judge will see this for what it is. Just another of Kimby’s long strings of lies told to the court.

  6. I said before that there are two ways of responding to this order to show cause. Looks like TDPK chose the wrong one.

    Here’s a lawyerly tip: don’t ever admit to performing illegal acts, especially not in a document you file with the court.

    Now that he has admitted the forgery, an enterprising party could take it to the local prosecutor and see if they are interested in pressing charges. The prosecutor might also be interested to know that the party that committed this crime is on probation.

  7. “It was all a mistake! I didn’t intend to mislead anyone! I misunderstood the process! I’ve apologized several times for my “mistake!””

    Aww. Give him another chance judge, the poor pro se dog convicted document forger with the paralegal degree doesn’t understand the law.

    • Really, how could he know that you’re not supposed to alter documents that have been signed by the Clerk of the Court? How could anyone know that, amirite?

      • He should have gone with his pro se dog ate the original summons which the clerk printed out for him as a favor because he left Twitchy off the complaint as a named defendant purely by mistake as anyone can see since he talked about them in the body of the complaint.

  8. Ohhhh kaaayy. He states arguments as facts, falshoods as arguments and facts as someone-elses problem. At no point does he do anything other than express contempt for the court and process and then admonishes the court that they are being overbearing by even suggesting sanctions for a simple error. It’s dizzyingly circular and arrogant.

  9. For someone who claimed he has filed “hundreds” of lawsuits, I don’t think this will fly with the judge. Not with all the other occurrences of apparent forgery that are out there as well.

    The worm is turning…

  10. No, I didn’t. Honest… I ran out of gas. I… I had a flat tire. I didn’t have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn’t come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts! IT WASN’T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD!

  11. Gee, its amazing. Apparently Brett was alllegedly apologizing to all of us, but Bill “Baghdad Blob” Schmalfeldt couldn’t get the story that he was admitting to forging a summons.

    Bill is now working with an admitted repeat offender. this is the sign he should learn how to legally exit a conspiracy and take those steps immediately.

  12. The bottom line is this: as daleyrocks reminded us above, BK sent the forged Twitchy summons c/o Salem Comm. He is claiming in paragraph 3, that he did so at the same time as he sent out all the other summonses, which is a provable lie. Why? Because if he had sent the summons out at the same time as the others, in October 2013, as he is claiming in this little Bo Peep tale of innocence, there is no way that he could have known in October that Twitchy was being acquired by Salem, an event that was not publicly announced until December 10. BK had to have sent the Twitchy summons out after that date. Oh, and he has a typewriter? With that kind of font?

    What does this mean? It means that no one has to judge whether or not the truth is being told because independent neutral verifiable facts clearly show that it is not.

    • not really, as usual, when BK is having a bad day or does something incredibly stupid, Twinkie decides its a good time to start blathering about how Hoge is allowing DEFAMATORY and FALSE comments that are HARASSMENT of him…

      seriously, first tweets about the motion started around 4 hours ago, and just like clockwork, Twinkie starts demanding Hoge moderate his comment section or Doom, DOOOM I SAY!!!1!!1!! shortly after….

      O.o

      • Well stated, Rain. Even has video this time and claims to be citing law. Hmmm… whom does he know who is a trained paralegal and also known as a jailhouse lawyer? And coincidentally would probably like a big distraction from at least a quasi-admission?

        Let me see if I understand the defense correctly – paraphrased – ‘Yeah, I did every single thing I was accused of doing but it’s because at age 60 something and after numerous pro-se lawsuits, I didn’t know it was wrong to edit court documents and send the edited docs out as if they were legitimate. I’ve truly learned my lesson this time way better than I did after being convicted of forgery in the past.’

        Oh yeah, stick with that one. GREAT defense there…

  13. Aaron beat me to the punch over at his place, but Judge Titus gave a nice summary of TDPK’s familiarity of the rules of procedure of this Federal District Court in the copyright case against Kimberlin Unmasked should anyone want to incorporate or reference them in future filings.

  14. I can’t help but be reminded of the old apocryphal story about the kid who killed his parents and then threw himself on the mercy of the Court because he was an orphan.

  15. seems to me BK is trying to get this thrown out of court so he can tell all his donors how persecuted he is by the “system” . . .
    well that and that he’s bugcrap crazy…

    O.o

    • Speaking of donors, Deanna took a look at the 990s and was not amused. I myself have to wonder how legitimate foundations would not expect more robust documentation and bookkeeping from a donee.

      • I suspect he requests small grants for operating support, and writes a letter of thanks talking about all the”famous musicians” the funding allowed JTMP to work with.

        It might work. For a while, anyway.

        The fact of a 990 arriving at a donor’s office, provided it was not closely read, would be considered adequate reporting. There is a tendency in nonprofit world to assume good intentions and not fraud.

    • The developer of the Minecraft mod called “Thaumcraft” used CBBS’s taint as the model for “taint” in the game. It can smother entire ecologies, turning the mildest mannered animals into kill-crazy monsters. Tendrils lash out at the innocent, maiming and killing…

  16. so you don’t have to read it, or watch the video about his ‘fake’ disability.

    I. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO READ ANY BLOG ON THE INTERNET, WHENEVER I WANT READ IT, HOWEVER OFTEN I CARE TO READ IT.
    Neither WJJ Hoge nor any of his followers can claim it is all right to say false, defamatory things about me because the defamation and harassment won’t bother me if I just don’t read the blog.

    II. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION IN CASES WHERE FALSE, DEFAMATORY INFORMATION IS PUBLISHED ABOUT ME.

    Saying that I am faking my Parkinson’s disease or exaggerating my symptoms to get a “government check” or for any other reason is false, defamatory and harassing. Before I retired, I was a GS-13 writer/editor with the Federal Government making upwards of $97K each year. Were I still employed, I would be over six figures at this point. Since retiring, I pull in less than $30K a year. It makes no sense for me to “fake” a condition that cuts my income by two-thirds. What’s more, people who don’t know me and read on the WJJ Hoge blog or anywhere else that I am “faking” are likely to believe this false, defamatory thing.

    III. I HAVE A RIGHT TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST THE OWNER OF THE HOGEWASH BLOG IF THESE FALSE, DEFAMATORY, HARASSING COMMENTS CONTINUE.

    As the owner of his blog, a blot that gets any where from a few dozen to 200 or so comments, Mr. Hoge is not overly burdened by the requirement to ensure that his blog does not contain false, defamatory, harassing information. Furthermore, as a private citizen, Mr. Hoge does not have the right to post false, defamatory items that refer to me by name, imply that he is writing about me, or otherwise write about me in a way that causes his readership to post false, defamatory and harassing things about me.

    THEREFORE: In as much as I am forbidden to contact WJJ Hoge in any direct or indirect fashion, I state to all who read these words that I will protect my reputation, I will vigorously fight the defamation leveled against me, and I will seek the assistance of my local government to prosecute crimes where I see them being committed.

    • “Inasmuch” is one word, not three separate words. I know you just copied this, Johnny. Just sayin’. Ahem.

    • Who claimed he wasn’t sick? He’s very, very sick. OH, he means the PS. Hmm pointing out clinical anomolies is now harasment and defamatory? I thought he was dying any day now as a result of all this stress. Stress he brings upon himself, as is his right.

    • Personally, IANAL, but I’m of the opinion of “see you in court Twinkie, Bring It.” but that is just me,,,,

      • exactly, just bluster and threats that mean nothing other than trying to intimidate others into doing what Twinkie wants…

        so again I say, See ya in court Twinkie, BRING IT!!
        or I would if I were the one being threatened…

        O.o

    • Point 1. BS is right that defamatory content does not become not defamatory if he fails to read it. But of course no one has said that. What they have said is that writing about BS is not harassing him. Since he has repeatedly asserted that writing to someone was not harassment, it is absurd for him to asset that writing about someone is. His entire shtick (and Kimberlin’s too) is that no one has a right to say things that annoy them, whether addressed to them or not and whether defamatory or not.

      Point 2. He mixes up falsity and defamation. If you say that I am being considered for beatification, that is blatantly false, but not defamatory. What is true is necessarily not legally defamatory, but what is false may or may not be legally defamatory.

      Point 3. He can file what he chooses. His filing is completely meaningless because he does not determine what criminal charges will be brought against whom. He has been threatening criminal prosecution of several for weeks with no apparent result.

      • Seems to me that he’s desperately attempting to contact our host without doing so directly. As he noted himself, indirect contact is also a violation. This isn’t the first or even the second such attempt. BTW – did anyone here know of our host holding a medical license and in addition, having reviewed medical records to come to a diagnosis? Yeah, me neither. From what I’ve read here, some have disclosed observed facts which support their opinions regarding the severity (or lack thereof) of symptoms. Classic, protected, opinion. IMO, of course. 😉

    • Wow, $97K!!

      Now he lives in a trailer on less than $30K.

      Betcha if he’d had even a minimally competent financial advisor, he wouldn’t be retired on the “72 Ways to Prepare Alpo & Love It!” diet.

    • Wait, I thought the Howard County States Attorney’s Public Affairs Office was just mere moments away from filing criminal charges against our gracious host for allowing comments that inflict first degree lulz with intent to butthurt upon Blob to stand.

      WHERE’S THE KABOOM?!? THERE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN EARTH SHATTERING KABOOM!!!

      • I fear that, as with Marvin, we poor Lickspittles will be eternally disappointed in our desires for kabooms.

  17. for your daily giggles, watch Twinkie try and convince us of his so-called ‘illness’

    mostly just rambling though.

  18. the accent is funny..but i think he calls himself ‘retarded’ at the end… maybe retired…but the first makes more sense to me.

  19. THIS NEEDS TO STOP, AND NEEDS TO STOP NOW. IT STOPS NOW!!!! BECAUSE ME SAYS SO….!!!

    GAIL…WHERES MY HOURLY TWINKIE?

    • You know what? I’m thinking this outraged outrage over the (perceived) outrage is more like — LOOK! A SQUIRREL!

  20. Sec 230 CDA, he can keep spitting in the wind. He’s so tiresome and I don’t care about him anymore, except as how he highlights Kimby’s screwups now and throughout time.

    • Did BS erase Walkers name and do all the photoshopping of the summons? Or was that all Kimby’s work? It was certainly his idea to make it and send it.

  21. QUESTION: Isn’t calling people, who have not been found guilty, “RICO Racketeers” and “Defamatory Five,” false and defamatory?

  22. The “accent” is slurring of speech that comes with PD

    I vote for ‘ignorant trailer park redneck’ instead.

  23. And before you say it, Fat Willy, there is a difference between saying you are faking your disease and saying you are exaggerating the symptoms of your disease.

  24. If Fat Willy posts a picture of text to twitter, you can be assured it is not what he says it is. Fat Willy tweets:

    https://twitter.com/ParkyBillTweets/status/443866042037575681

    The WHOLE text reads:

    From a corporate standpoint, you should also have a clear policy on blogging for your employees. The reason for this is that your company can be held responsible for the actions of your employees during their course of employment. Employees writing comments about competitors or ex-employers can be a hot spot for legal trouble. In some situations, you can even be held responsible for third party, non employee comments posted on your blog. Section 230 of The Communications Decency Act of 1996 does provide immunity for blog owners/administrators from liability arising out of third party comments on their blogs, but it is not completely failsafe. If it can be at least implied that you either incited the comments, or that you didn’t delete them where you had deleted similar comments in the past, it might nullify the immunity. To that end, many in the legal community argue that it is best to not even allow third party comments on your blog. The shock! After all, it’s a blog!”

    Ooooooh, Fat Willy. That whole paragraph is about corporate blogging and the responsibilities to workers.

    My God are you dishonest.

    • It’s also wrong. WRT sec 230,. editing only compromises the broad immunities granted, when the content of the comment is altered by the provider to change the meaning, so that it becomes the providers direct content. Immunity remains whether the provider moderates, doesn’t moderate, moderates intermittently or moderates inconsistently. What matters is whose content it is.

      An employer might have special duties to employees, but not for moderating private blogs.
      Incitement is speech exhorting imminent lawless action.

    • Ah, now I see why he keeps saying Hoge is stirring things up to cause violence. It’s an outright lie, but he seems to have watched Harry Potter too many times — Just because you say something 3 times doesn’t really mean it appears or becomes true.

  25. I think we are all OBLIGATED to watch video until the very end. Because at the end…

    IT STOPS. THE DEFAMATION. IT STOPS NOW. STOP IT NOW. NOW IT STOPS. NOW STOP IT. STOP IT NOW. STOP NOW IT. SEE STOP. SEE STOP RUN. RUN STOP RUN. LOOK. LOOK, LOOK STOP. LOOK AT DICK AND JANE. WHAT ARE DICK AND JANE DOING THERE BEHIND THE COUCH?

    Well…that escalated quickly.

    • Well said, Palatine! But I have to kindly turn down the option of watching the video. It stung my eyes 5 seconds into it.

  26. The statement “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s” is a string of characters on a computer screen that it appears at least one person doesn’t like to read. “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s” is also an opinion that some people may or may not agree with, said opinion being that “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s.” Some people may or may not believe Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s when they write “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s.” Other people may just think they should have the legal right to type “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s” whenever they feel like it, because the First Amendment protects the expression of opinions that others may, or may not, hold to.

    CHAPTER REVIEW QUESTIONS: In what ways do the letters inscribed in the quotation “Bill Schmalfeldt is faking his Parkinson’s” discriminate against environmentalists? Discuss.

    • Actually, if The Mad Terrorist would have blamed everything on Fat Willy, he could have entered all these “conveniently” clipped quotes as evidence of Willy’s malice.

  27. Since Fat Willy is having such trouble with Sec. 230, I’ll help him out:

    What protection does Section 230 provide?

    Section 230 says that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” This federal law preempts any state laws to the contrary: “[n]o cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.” The courts have repeatedly rejected attempts to limit the reach of Section 230 to “traditional” Internet service providers, instead treating many diverse entities as “interactive computer service providers.”

    How does Section 230 apply to bloggers?

    Bloggers can be both a provider and a user of interactive computer services. Bloggers are users when they create and edit blogs through a service provider, and they are providers to the extent that they allow third parties to add comments or other material to their blogs.

    Your readers’ comments, entries written by guest bloggers, tips sent by email, and information provided to you through an RSS feed would all likely be considered information provided by another content provider. This would mean that you would not be held liable for defamatory statements contained in it. However, if you selected the third-party information yourself, no court has ruled whether this information would be considered “provided” to you. One court has limited Section 230 immunity to situations in which the originator “furnished it to the provider or user under circumstances in which a reasonable person…would conclude that the information was provided for publication on the Internet….”

    So if you are actively going out and gathering data on your own, then republishing it on your blog, we cannot guarantee that Section 230 would shield you from liability. But we believe that Section 230 should cover information a blogger has selected from other blogs or elsewhere on the Internet, since the originator provided the information for publication to the world. However, no court has ruled on this.

    And Willy, this here is called a link.

    https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/230

    I’m linking to the actual page the content comes from so everybody can look to see I haven’t cut something important out.

  28. I certainly appreciate Schmalfeldt performing the finger tapping test for the camera. I’ll be bringing that clip with me when I visit my neurologist tomorrow.

    I realize that doctors are loathe to diagnose long distance, so I’m going to ask one simple question –” Does the person in this video, who has never experienced much tremor or rigidity but does suffer severe gait disturbance, appear to you to be in the advanced or end stages of Parkinson’s disease?”

    If he says yes, I will apologize to Bill.

    But I’m confident I’m right. A quick look in the mirror (or listening to myself speak) shows me how much progess the condition still has to go on Bill. And I don’t even consider myself “end stage” yet (but getting there.)

    IN MY ELEVENTY OPINION, Bill Schmalfeldt is not FAKING Parkinsons Disease, but he is EXAGERATING the severity of his PD when he describes it as “end stage” or “advanced”.

    We shall see if my PD specialist thinks otherwise tomorrow afternoon.

    • I apologize if this is more info than people want, but I thought I’d provide some context to Schmalfeldt’s demonstration of the severity of his bradykinesia (slow movement), compared to others.

      How would you score the Cabin Boy?

      Remember that Bradykinesia is the only one of the three major symptoms of PD which affects Bill, since he has no tremor or rigidity.

      “Advanced”. Riiight!

      • That video, in comparison to Willy’s, demonstrates better than almost anything why we both (and others) are under the opinion that he is exaggerating his Parkinson’s.

        Good job.

    • Just for the hell of it , here are the other two cardinal symptoms of PD, which Schmalfeldt is lucky enough NOT to have. First – tremor.

      And lastly, the one that is most disabling – rigidity.

      Remember, Bill has neither of these.

      “End stage”. Suuure!

    • “severe gait disturbance”

      Is there a marked difference between Parkinson’s gait disturbance and Fat Guy gait disturbance? Could Bill’s problems be that he’s fat?

      • Yes, there is a difference, and I have to be fair. I’ve seen vids of Bill walk, and he definitely has gait disturbance consistent with Parkinson’s. I doubt he would know how to fake the signs, and if he did, he’d probably be clever enough to fake some other symptom too.

        As it is, it seems clear he has idiopathic Parkinson’s, which is an unlucky break compared to the general population.

        But among other people with Parkinson’s, he is extremely lucky, since it is only his gait that is affected. If only he had the wisdom to appreciate his (relative) good fortune.

  29. Fat Willy, in your video you say that your “fingers still work for typing”.

    Are you now admitting that your previous statements that your Parkinson’s interfered with your typing so you had to use Voice Recognition were lies?

    If not, how do you explain the discrepancy?

    • BS, that is DEFAMATORY and FALSE. MUST BE REMOVED. Right? Unless he’s sitting on some court rulings that declared Hoge an “adjudicated harasser” or the like.

    • I was just going to post that!

      And Willy, please tell us how Mr. Hoge assaulted and abused you. I’d love to hear those stories.

    • Indeed. His decision to post that “IT ENDS NOW!!!” video was disastrous for his allegation that he is somehow being killed by the posts on this site. He is so far removed from his own actions that he cannot realize that all we see is a tremendously well-fed cranky old man. It may be that he hasn’t had contact with people who truly suffer from PD, but anyone who has ever dealt with the disease either personally or with friends or family, looks at that and wonders what the bloody hell he’s talking about.

    • Another Bible verse that has been on my mind of late. I am sure Mr. Nixon would have some interesting thoughts on this one:

      “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.” (John 8:44)

      • Two responses. First on how sin (and death) came into God’s creation:
        The LORD God formed man out of the clay of the ground
        and blew into his nostrils the breath of life,
        and so man became a living being.

        Then the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east,
        and placed there the man whom he had formed.
        Out of the ground the LORD God made various trees grow
        that were delightful to look at and good for food,
        with the tree of life in the middle of the garden
        and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

        Now the serpent was the most cunning of all the animals
        that the LORD God had made.
        The serpent asked the woman,
        “Did God really tell you not to eat
        from any of the trees in the garden?”
        The woman answered the serpent:
        “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden;
        it is only about the fruit of the tree
        in the middle of the garden that God said,
        ‘You shall not eat it or even touch it, lest you die.’”
        But the serpent said to the woman:
        “You certainly will not die!
        No, God knows well that the moment you eat of it
        your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods
        who know what is good and what is evil.”
        The woman saw that the tree was good for food,
        pleasing to the eyes, and desirable for gaining wisdom.
        So she took some of its fruit and ate it;
        and she also gave some to her husband, who was with her,
        and he ate it.
        Then the eyes of both of them were opened,
        and they realized that they were naked;
        so they sewed fig leaves together
        and made loincloths for themselves.

      • Second, on the Devil and how a follow of Christ Jesus should conduct their lives in the light of the 3 things brought out in the first reading above from GN 2:7-9; 3:1-7 i.e. the sin of greed, the sin of covetousness and the sin of pride. Consider these things as you read MT 4:1-11:
        At that time Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert
        to be tempted by the devil.
        He fasted for forty days and forty nights,
        and afterwards he was hungry.
        The tempter approached and said to him,
        “If you are the Son of God,
        command that these stones become loaves of bread.”
        He said in reply,
        “It is written:
        One does not live on bread alone,
        but on every word that comes forth
        from the mouth of God.”

        Then the devil took him to the holy city,
        and made him stand on the parapet of the temple,
        and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down.
        For it is written:
        He will command his angels concerning you
        and with their hands they will support you,
        lest you dash your foot against a stone.”
        Jesus answered him,
        “Again it is written,
        You shall not put the Lord, your God, to the test.”
        Then the devil took him up to a very high mountain,
        and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence,
        and he said to him, “All these I shall give to you,
        if you will prostrate yourself and worship me.”
        At this, Jesus said to him,
        “Get away, Satan!
        It is written:
        The Lord, your God, shall you worship
        and him alone shall you serve.”

        Then the devil left him and, behold,
        angels came and ministered to him.

  30. Here’s some great trivia:

    Since Fat Willy stopped posting to his @NatBloggersClub account, it has actually gained followers!

    Now that’s got to hurt….

    • OH I expect that account to go byebye quite soon, just as soon as BK tells Twinkie to 86 it before it’s used as evidence against them both….

      O.o

  31. As others have pointed out anytime there is news about TK that is not good Fat Willy really starts deflecting and ends up becoming part of the story. Exactly what a real journalist would do.

    Also as others have stated he has no concept of the impact of his own actions. He is continually tying himself into Team Kimberlin. No matter how bad this may be for him.

    One would think that this filing would be a good point for BS to reconsider his position. But I have zero belief that he will do so. Just expect more of the same. He is what he is. Spots and all.

  32. Bill, do you type your tweets or do you use Voice Recogniton?

    You toss out the accusation “LIAR!” quite often, but here we have evidence that you were claiming that you were using VR when it was brought to your attention that even good typists would have trouble posting a tweet a minute (and sometimes faster) for an extended period of time like you do. Yet you now claim in your video posted above that your fingers are good for typing.

    Were you lying then or are you lying now?

  33. What is it about sociopaths that they invariably – when caught in some misbehavior – claim to have apologized “already” when they never actually ever did so?

    • The same reason Bill S would post a video of him look almost normal for the purpose of eliciting sympathy for his Parkinson’s-related suffering. Their ability to associate their own actions with other people is impaired. They are so assured of their own “rightness” that any actual results (hey, he didn’t apologize to me!) aren’t considered.

      Both BK and BS demonstrate this almost childlike ability to deny reality in the face of reality over and over.

  34. I see now that Fat Willy has changed tack mid-course (!!!) and now claims he has advanced Parkinson’s. Quite a change from “end-stage Parkinson’s.

    Willy, in your condition you shouldn’t be backpedaling so much.

  35. Pingback: Update on Kimberlin the Corporate Raider

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s