The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has been given until close of business this Friday to file any further amendments to his complaint in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. One reason he wishes to do so is that so much of his existing amended complaint has been gutted by the various motions to dismiss. As we wait this week for TDPK’s latest magnum opus, let’s review some of the better bits from those motions to dismiss.
Here’s a look at what Twitchy had to say about the summons and complaint they received.
Both the “Summons” and the “First Amended Complaint” Mr. Kimberlin mailed to Twitchy appear to be falsified. While the FAC on file with this Court does not include Twitchy among the 21 defendants in the caption, the FAC that Mr. Kimberlin mailed to Twitchy lists in its caption 22 defendants – “Twitchy” simply has been typed into the caption between defendants DB Capitol Strategies and The Franklin Center. Compare, Ex A (R.2, p. 1) with Ex B & its Tab 2, p. 1 (first page of FAC mailed to Twitchy). The version of the FAC mailed to Twitchy also lacks the header mark imprinted electronically atop each page by PACER upon efiling, marks that plainly are visible on the actual FAC. Id. It also is missing the “FILED” time-stamp affixed by the Clerk on its p. 1, Id. Obviously, the document Mr. Kimberlin mailed to Twitchy, and represented as being the FAC, is not the same document that is on file with this Court as R.2 – it has been doctored to add Twitchy to the caption as a defendant.
Similarly, the “Summons” Mr. Kimberlin mailed to Twitchy, and addressed to “Twitchy c/o Salem” purports by its electronic PACER markings to be p. 14 of the 18-page set of summonses the Clerk issued on November 12, 2013. Ex B & its Tab 1. However, page 14 of the set of summonses actually issued by and on file with the Clerk is the summons directed to co-defendant Aaron Walker. Ex C (R.4, p. 14 of 18). Mr. Kimberlin appears to have simply inserted Twitchy’s name and address in place of those of Mr. Walker, the intended recipient of the summons actually issued by this Court.
Have I mentioned that TDPK has been convicted of perjury and forging document? I think I may have.